邏輯哲學中的實在論立
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-14 07:20
【摘要】：普特南的不可取締性論證的主旨在于:在邏輯哲學和數學哲學中,對集合之類的抽象實體實行量化是不可取締的,唯名論者認為諸如類和數實際上并不存在的思想是不正確的。為了替自己的論證辯護,普特南與各式各樣的反對者進行了論戰(zhàn)。對于這一論證的有效反駁似乎至今還沒有出現,對于這一論證的反駁會一直持續(xù)下去,這或許正是普特南不可取締性論證的魅力所在。
[Abstract]:The purport of Putnam's argumentation of irrevocability is that in the philosophy of logic and mathematics, it is impossible to quantify the abstract entities such as sets, while nominalists believe that the idea that classes and numbers do not actually exist is incorrect. In defence of his argument, Putnam argued with a wide variety of opponents. The valid rebuttal of this argument seems to have not yet appeared, and the rebuttal of this argument will continue, which may be the charm of Putnam's irrevocable argument.
【作者單位】： 西南財經大學馬克思主義學院;中山大學邏輯與認知研究所;南開大學哲學系;
【分類號】：B812
本文編號：2120901
[Abstract]:The purport of Putnam's argumentation of irrevocability is that in the philosophy of logic and mathematics, it is impossible to quantify the abstract entities such as sets, while nominalists believe that the idea that classes and numbers do not actually exist is incorrect. In defence of his argument, Putnam argued with a wide variety of opponents. The valid rebuttal of this argument seems to have not yet appeared, and the rebuttal of this argument will continue, which may be the charm of Putnam's irrevocable argument.
【作者單位】： 西南財經大學馬克思主義學院;中山大學邏輯與認知研究所;南開大學哲學系;
【分類號】：B812
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前1條
1 吳玉平;任曉明;;邏輯哲學中的實在論立場——普特南的不可取締性論證探究[J];江西社會科學;2009年05期
，本文編號：2120901
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/ljx/2120901.html
