發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-06 12:33

  本文選題：奧斯汀式闡釋 + 羅素式闡釋　； 參考：《安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2008年05期

【摘要】：以?shī)W斯汀式命題觀為基礎(chǔ)、奧斯汀式闡釋為形式,情境語(yǔ)義學(xué)解悖方案合乎直覺(jué)地解決了以說(shuō)謊者悖論為首的一批語(yǔ)義悖論。通過(guò)對(duì)比分析奧斯汀式闡釋與羅素式闡釋,可以看出,說(shuō)謊者悖論產(chǎn)生的根源是忽視了情境或情境要素參量。情境語(yǔ)義學(xué)解悖方案對(duì)語(yǔ)形悖論,包括羅素悖論和合信悖論等也具有推廣價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Based on Austen's propositional view and Austen's interpretation, situational semantics resolves intuitively a group of semantic paradoxes led by the liar's paradox. Through a comparative analysis of Austen interpretation and Russell interpretation, we can see that the origin of liar paradox lies in the neglect of context or situational essential parameters. Situational semantics solutions are also valuable for the promotion of paranoia, including Russell paradox and belief paradox.
【作者單位】： 浙江大學(xué)語(yǔ)言與認(rèn)知研究中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目(03BZX043) 教育部人文社科重點(diǎn)研究基地重大項(xiàng)目(05JJD720.40002) 河南社科聯(lián)項(xiàng)目(SKL-2008-120)
【分類號(hào)】：B812
，

本文編號(hào)：2102805