本文選題：佛教邏輯 + 量式��； 參考：《貴州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：百年來(lái)佛教量論因明學(xué)發(fā)展跌宕起伏,自1982年2月在北京召開搶救因明座談會(huì)之后,“搶救因明遺產(chǎn)、推動(dòng)因明發(fā)展”成了當(dāng)前學(xué)術(shù)界的一項(xiàng)重要而急迫的任務(wù)。佛教量論因明學(xué)是當(dāng)今漢傳因明與藏傳量論交融發(fā)展的結(jié)晶,“量式”更是研究量論因明學(xué)的核心內(nèi)容。本文正是以百年中國(guó)佛教量論因明學(xué)的歷史發(fā)展為背景,評(píng)述“量式”研究狀況,從而梳理出當(dāng)前對(duì)“量式”研究的熱點(diǎn)和焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,并對(duì)此進(jìn)行了思考,希望對(duì)量式研究提供新思路�；诎倌曛袊�(guó)學(xué)界對(duì)佛教量論因明學(xué)的原典研究和原典研究之研究,筆者對(duì)“量式”進(jìn)行了明確的劃分,認(rèn)為量式是在“量”的視域下所研究的“式”,是以量論為基礎(chǔ)的語(yǔ)言表達(dá)范式,以“量式”為上位概念,“論式”和“法式”是下位概念,而“應(yīng)成式”是“法式”的實(shí)際運(yùn)用。通過(guò)對(duì)“論式”的研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)漢傳因明的量式研究主要集中在“論式”,其中對(duì)陳那改革后的三支論式的評(píng)價(jià)最高,對(duì)成立三支論式的形式要求因三相的研究最為集中,然而對(duì)因三相和三支論式進(jìn)行符號(hào)表達(dá)時(shí),學(xué)界學(xué)者從不同的角度提供不同的論證,從而產(chǎn)生了諸多論諍。通過(guò)對(duì)“法式”、“應(yīng)成式”的研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)藏傳量論的量式研究集中在“法式”,因此,藏傳量論對(duì)法稱的體系更為推崇。而在這近百年的研究中,漢傳因明與藏傳量論交融發(fā)展,漢藏學(xué)者相互交流相互促進(jìn),“量式”背后龐大的量論因明學(xué)體系正是在這樣的背景下逐漸清晰起來(lái),“量式”在量論因明學(xué)中的功能正是在這樣的認(rèn)識(shí)論前提下顯得尤為重要,量論因明學(xué)正是在“量式”的研究的基礎(chǔ)上成了探求佛教認(rèn)知模式之門的鑰匙。
[Abstract]:Over the past hundred years, the development of the Buddhist theory of imminence has fluctuated. Since the forum on rescuing Yiming was held in Beijing in February 1982, "rescuing Yiming's heritage and promoting the development of Yiming" has become an important and urgent task in current academic circles. The theory of quantity and quantity of Buddhism is the crystallization of the blending and development of the theory of Han Dynasty and the theory of Tibetan quantity, and the form of quantity is the core of the study of the theory of quantity. Based on the historical development of the theory of quantity in Chinese Buddhism in the past 100 years, this paper reviews the research status of "quantitative style", thus sorting out the hot spots and focal issues in the study of "quantitative style", and thinking about it. It is hoped to provide new ideas for quantitative research. Based on the study of the original code and the original code of the theory of quantity in Buddhism in China for a hundred years, the author makes a clear distinction between the "quantitative form" and the "quantitative form", and holds that the quantitative form is the "form" studied in the field of "quantity". It is a linguistic expression paradigm based on quantity theory, in which "quantity" is the upper concept, "theory" and "French" are lower concepts, and "should form" is the practical application of "French". Through the study of the "theoretical style", it is found that the quantitative study of Han Zhuan's Yiming is mainly focused on the "argumentative style", in which the evaluation of the three-branch theory after Chen Na's reform is the highest, and the research on the form of establishing the three-branch theory is the most concentrated because of the three-phase research. However, when the three-phase and three-branch theory are expressed by symbols, scholars provide different arguments from different angles, resulting in a great deal of argumentation. Through the study of "French" and "should form", it is found that the quantitative study of the theory of Tibetan quantity is concentrated on "French", therefore, the theory of Tibetan quantity is more canonical to the system of legalization. In the past hundred years of research, the blending and development of Han Zhuan and the theory of Tibetan quantity, the exchanges and mutual promotion between Han and Tibetan scholars, the huge system of quantitative Invincialism behind the "quantitative pattern" has gradually become clear under such a background. The function of "quantitative type" in the study of quantitative theory of imminence is especially important under the premise of epistemology, which is the key to explore the cognitive model of Buddhism on the basis of the study of "quantitative mode".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B81-092

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈海波;略論因明學(xué)史學(xué)上的若干問(wèn)題[J];世界宗教研究;2004年03期

2 張曉翔;;首屆國(guó)際因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)概述[J];世界宗教研究;2006年03期

3 張忠義;;搶救絕學(xué) 發(fā)揚(yáng)光大——首屆國(guó)際因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)綜述[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2006年09期

4 ;中國(guó)第三屆因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)在西寧召開[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

5 張忠義;劉純;;因明風(fēng)采 再現(xiàn)絲綢之路——中國(guó)第四屆因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)綜述[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2009年03期

6 思齊;;第六屆全國(guó)因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)在洛陽(yáng)召開[J];中州學(xué)刊;2010年03期

7 ;第六屆全國(guó)因明學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2010年06期

8 張曉翔;;第七屆全國(guó)因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)綜述[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2012年02期

9 樂(lè)逸鷗;因明座談會(huì)在北京召開[J];國(guó)內(nèi)哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);1982年06期

10 多識(shí);;談藏族對(duì)因明學(xué)的貢獻(xiàn)[J];西北民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1992年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 劉培育;;因明三十四年[A];因明新探——首屆因明學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文集[C];1983年

2 波米·強(qiáng)巴洛卓;楊化群;宋曉嵇;;藏傳因明的作用和基本內(nèi)容——入因明學(xué)階梯[A];因明研究[C];1990年

3 劉邦凡;唐歆;宋茜;;簡(jiǎn)論近代以來(lái)的我國(guó)因明教學(xué)[A];第一次南開邏輯學(xué)專業(yè)學(xué)人學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

4 沈劍英;;因明學(xué)簡(jiǎn)論[A];全國(guó)邏輯討論會(huì)論文選集[C];1979年

5 周文英;;因明在印度的發(fā)生和發(fā)展[A];因明論文集[C];1980年

6 沈劍英;;因明學(xué)簡(jiǎn)論[A];因明論文集[C];1980年

7 沈劍英;;略論因明的宗[A];因明論文集[C];1980年

8 石村;;因明二問(wèn)[A];因明論文集[C];1980年

9 周文英;;隋唐時(shí)期因明的輸入[A];因明論文集[C];1980年

10 呂o，

本文編號(hào)：2077831