本文選題：博弈 + 邏輯方法��； 參考：《燕山大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：博弈是指個人或組織在一定的規(guī)則約束下,根據(jù)所處的環(huán)境,依據(jù)所掌握的信息,進(jìn)行策略選擇并加以實施,并從中取得相應(yīng)收益的過程。文中主要探討在策略選擇的過程中,理性主體是如何推理來實現(xiàn)最大收益或支付值的。博弈中的邏輯推理正是邏輯思維、方法應(yīng)用于博弈的嘗試。理性人要做到使自己利益最大化,那么關(guān)鍵就在“推理”。關(guān)于博弈推理的研究,無論是對于邏輯學(xué)的應(yīng)用還是博弈理論的發(fā)展都有一定的現(xiàn)實意義。 本文首先概述了博弈的定義、要素、分類及基本概念。并且從邏輯層面上探討了博弈思維,同時也探討了博弈思維應(yīng)符合邏輯思維原則。在這一部分又通過分析博弈思維活動,對每個環(huán)節(jié)進(jìn)行推理研究,從而更能體現(xiàn)邏輯性。在第二章中借助各種實例對博弈活動進(jìn)行推理分析,從而分析博弈活動中的演繹推理和歸納推理,并探討了這兩種推理的關(guān)系。在第三章中,談到博弈中存在的問題。這一部分首先對理性人假設(shè)困境進(jìn)行分析,從而使理性基礎(chǔ)地位得到加固。其次,對博弈中存在的悖論進(jìn)行思考。逆推歸納法在邏輯上是嚴(yán)密的,可它卻存在著“困境”。交流理性有助于消除逆推歸納法悖論。 邏輯學(xué)是一門應(yīng)用科學(xué),此文章的意義也在于擴(kuò)展了邏輯學(xué)的研究范圍,從而也豐富了博弈論。博弈邏輯仍處于初創(chuàng)階段,需要進(jìn)行更深層次的研究以推動理論的發(fā)展。理論研究成果也將運(yùn)用到博弈活動中去指導(dǎo)實踐。
[Abstract]:Game is a process in which individuals or organizations, under certain rules, choose and implement strategies according to their environment, according to the information they have, and make corresponding profits from them. In this paper, we mainly discuss how the rational agent can infer to realize the maximum income or payment value in the process of policy choice. The logic reasoning in the game is just the logical thinking, the method is applied to the attempt of the game. Rational people want to maximize their own interests, so the key lies in "reasoning." The study of game reasoning is of practical significance for the application of logic and the development of game theory. This paper first summarizes the definition, elements, classification and basic concepts of game theory. At the same time, it also discusses that the game thinking should conform to the principle of logical thinking. In this part, through the analysis of game thinking activities, the reasoning of each link is studied, so as to reflect the logic more. In the second chapter, we use various cases to analyze the reasoning of game activities, and then analyze the deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning in game activities, and discuss the relationship between the two kinds of reasoning. In the third chapter, we talk about the problems in the game. This part firstly analyzes the predicaments of rational man's hypothesis, so as to strengthen the rational foundation position. Secondly, the paradox in the game is considered. The inverse inductive method is strict in logic, but it has a "dilemma". Logic is an applied science. The significance of this paper is to expand the scope of logic and enrich game theory. Game logic is still in its infancy, and further research is needed to promote the development of the theory. Theoretical research results will also be applied to game activities to guide practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：B812

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘天群;;決策邏輯中的悖論研究[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年05期

2 李健;;與歸納推理相關(guān)的兩類博弈活動[J];畢節(jié)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年03期

3 張峰;;論博弈邏輯的分析方法——納什均衡分析法[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年02期

4 賀壽南;尹秀嬌;;博弈視野中逆向歸納法的邏輯分析[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

5 張峰;博弈邏輯述評[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

6 張峰;逆推歸納法悖論探析[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年12期

7 潘天群;從評價到?jīng)Q策:科學(xué)邏輯研究的可能轉(zhuǎn)向[J];淮陰師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年03期

8 韓飛;;論決策過程中的邏輯應(yīng)用[J];市場論壇;2010年03期

9 潘天群;博弈論中理性人假設(shè)的困境[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2003年04期

10 張峰;;博弈邏輯的發(fā)展軌跡探析[J];晉陽學(xué)刊;2008年01期

，

本文編號：1996579