本文選題：應(yīng)國 + 具銘銅器　； 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文在對應(yīng)國具銘銅器資料進行全面搜集和對相關(guān)銅器進行辨?zhèn)慰甲C的基礎(chǔ)上,通過對具銘銅器的年代學(xué)研究,建立應(yīng)國具銘銅器的年代學(xué)體系,構(gòu)建應(yīng)世家世系。全文分為五部分： 緒論主要介紹選題背景、研究現(xiàn)狀及本文的研究范圍與目標(biāo)。 第一章對應(yīng)國具銘銅器資料進行整理研究,重點考訂應(yīng)國具銘銅器的來源、數(shù)量、款識及辨?zhèn)?力求對應(yīng)國具銘銅器的現(xiàn)狀有一個全面的掌握。應(yīng)國具銘銅器有三個來源：1、應(yīng)國墓地和其他地區(qū)考古出土,51件；2、傳世品,20件；3、近年收藏機構(gòu)購藏的流散品,13件,共計84件。 第二章對應(yīng)國銅器中的4件偽品,即應(yīng)公劍、十六字應(yīng)公鼎以及首陽齋收藏的應(yīng)侯簋和上海博物館收藏的應(yīng)侯視工鼎進行辨?zhèn)巍?第三章對應(yīng)國具銘銅器進行斷代研究。主要利用考古類型學(xué)方法,通過形制、紋飾、字體諸因素的綜合分析,判定具銘銅器的年代關(guān)系,得出以下重要結(jié)論： 1、屬應(yīng)國國君器的傳世具銘銅中,應(yīng)公尊A屬成王時期,器主當(dāng)即應(yīng)國的始封君應(yīng)公Ⅰ；應(yīng)公簋A、應(yīng)公簋B、應(yīng)公卣A、應(yīng)公卣B、應(yīng)公鼎A、應(yīng)公鼎B以及十六字應(yīng)公鼎等屬昭王時期,其器主應(yīng)公Ⅱ,但不能確定其與應(yīng)公工的關(guān)系；應(yīng)公方鼎、應(yīng)公觶屬穆王時期,其器主為應(yīng)公Ⅲ乃應(yīng)國墓地M84應(yīng)侯再之父。應(yīng)公Ⅲ謚號懶公。 2、目前所見應(yīng)國墓地出土應(yīng)國國君器屬于西周中期至東周初年,其中M84墓主應(yīng)侯再主體年代在穆王晚年至懿孝時期；M104、M105墓主藝虎可能為一代應(yīng)侯,主體年代在西周中期偏晚,其與應(yīng)侯再的關(guān)系不能確定；應(yīng)侯視工器絕大部分流散,應(yīng)侯視工的主體年代在厲王早期,上限或可至夷王時期；M95墓主應(yīng)侯敵主體年代在厲王晚年至宣王初年；M13墓主應(yīng)侯叔誥父主體年代在宣王時期；M8墓主應(yīng)公Ⅳ主體年代在宣王末期至春秋早期。 3、非應(yīng)國國君器的具銘銅器中,江西出土的應(yīng)監(jiān)u屬成王時期,當(dāng)應(yīng)公工時期；柞伯簋屬昭王時期,當(dāng)應(yīng)公Ⅱ時期；應(yīng)國墓地M51、M50匍v傘229屬穆王時期,當(dāng)懶公時期。 4、對應(yīng)國具銘銅器形制、紋飾、銘文特點進行了歸納,認(rèn)為西周早期偏晚昭王時期至西周晚期,是應(yīng)國形成獨特青銅文化的時期。 結(jié)語對全文主要內(nèi)容進行了總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:On the basis of collecting the materials of the corresponding country's inscription bronze ware and discriminating the relevant bronze ware, this paper establishes the chronological system of the bronze ware of the Ming inscription by studying the chronology of the bronze ware, and constructs the family of the bronze ware of the corresponding country. The full text is divided into five parts: introduction mainly introduces the background, research status and research scope and objectives of this paper. In the first chapter, the author makes a study on the materials of the corresponding country's bronze inscriptions, focusing on the sources, quantities, funds and forgeries of the corresponding country's inscriptions, in order to have a comprehensive grasp of the current situation of the corresponding country's bronze inscriptions. There are three sources of bronze wares in Yingguo inscription: 1, 51 pieces unearthed in cemeteries and other regions, 20 pieces handed down, and 13 pieces of scattered articles collected by collectors in recent years, a total of 84 pieces. The second chapter deals with four counterfeit pieces of bronze wares in China, namely, Ying Gong Jian, 16 characters Ying Gongding, Yinghou Gui collected by Shouyang Zhai and Hou Gui collected by Shanghai Museum. In the third chapter, the author studies the age of the bronze ware of Guozhouming. By using the archaeological typology method, through the comprehensive analysis of various factors, such as shape, decoration and font, the chronological relationship of bronze inscriptions has been determined, and the following important conclusions have been drawn: 1. Ying Gong Jun A belongs to the period of becoming king, and the master of the vessel immediately should be the beginning of the country and the king should be the king; the master of the vessel shall be the king of the period of Zhao Wang, such as Yinggong Gui, Ying Gong Gui, Ying Gong you, Ying Gong Ding A, Ying Gong Ding B, and sixteen characters shall be the same as the king. However, it is not certain that the relationship between Ying Gong Ding and Ying Gong Ji belongs to the period of Muwang, and its owner is Ying Gong 鈪，

本文編號：2026773