發(fā)布時間：2018-03-17 06:07

  本文選題：郭沫若　切入點(diǎn)：金文　出處：《山東師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：郭沫若是現(xiàn)代著名古文字學(xué)家,他在甲骨文、金文、石鼓文等古文字研究領(lǐng)域成果豐碩、成就斐然,與羅振玉、王國維、董作賓并稱為“甲骨四堂”。然而其在金文方面的研究卻有著劃時代的意義,主要體現(xiàn)在《兩周金文辭大系》一書中。臺灣學(xué)者江淑惠說“金文學(xué)的內(nèi)容可以說是由他建立起來的”�！秲芍芙鹞霓o大系》不僅創(chuàng)立了《彝器形象學(xué)》,在金文考釋、訓(xùn)詁方面更是碩果累累。郭氏在書中釋讀了大量銘文,他所考釋出的金文文字,很多已為后世學(xué)者承認(rèn),并被《漢語大字典》等權(quán)威工具書所引用。他在書中所采用的考釋方法,種類豐富、形式多樣,為后人研究金文學(xué)、訓(xùn)詁學(xué)提供了很好的范例,值得繼承和發(fā)揚(yáng)。郭氏深厚的考據(jù)功夫,是建立在他對《說文》深刻的理解、對前賢全面的總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)之上的。我們對《兩周金文辭大系》一書的文字考釋部分作了較為全面的梳理,揀出比較典型的實(shí)例,結(jié)合訓(xùn)詁學(xué)、文字學(xué)、音韻學(xué)方面的一般理論和最新成果,對郭氏在《兩周金文辭大系》一書中的考釋方法、慣用術(shù)語、考釋方法源流等方面作了試探性的挖掘。 全文由緒論、本論和結(jié)語三個部分構(gòu)成。 第一章,緒論部分。對《兩周金文辭大系》作者及其生平作了簡要介紹,闡述了對該書進(jìn)行專書研究的意義,并對我們研究《兩周金文辭大系》的方法作了簡要說明�！秲芍芙鹞霓o大系》作者郭沫若生平較為復(fù)雜,爭議頗多,我們主要介紹其跟金文文字考釋相關(guān)的學(xué)術(shù)經(jīng)歷和因由,對于其他方面不做說明�！秲芍芙鹞霓o大系》一書,由于其出版的時代、地域、作者增減修改、出版等原因,版本稍顯復(fù)雜。該書開始出版于日本,以《兩周金文辭大系》為書名,作者回國后又進(jìn)行整理和補(bǔ)充,分別著錄了《兩周金文辭大系圖錄》和《兩周金文辭大系考釋》兩本專著,而1957年出版的時候,又命名為《兩周金文辭大系圖錄考釋》,并分為圖編、錄編和考釋三部。因圖編是彝器圖形,錄編是彝器上的銘文圖像,只有考釋部分才有文字性的內(nèi)容,所以我們主要選取這一部作為研究的原始語料。為行文方便,稱其為《兩周金文辭大系》,有時簡稱《大系》。在對該書進(jìn)行研究的過程中,主要采用了歸納分類、統(tǒng)計和比較三種科學(xué)方法。 本論是文章的重點(diǎn)部分,又分為三個部分。 第二章,《兩周金文辭大系》文字考釋方法。按照訓(xùn)詁學(xué)和文字學(xué)的一般理論,將郭氏在《大系》中所用的方法分類歸納,從形、音、義三個方面進(jìn)行說明。我們不但摘錄書中的實(shí)例,在所采用的例子下,還盡可能的搜集各家所說,增補(bǔ)一些相應(yīng)的觀點(diǎn)。郭氏考釋金文,常常不拘一格,有些實(shí)例比較特殊,就暫時闕疑,以待進(jìn)一步的研究。綜合來說,郭沫若在《兩周金文辭大系》中采用的考釋方法主要有:一、據(jù)形考釋。分為比較法和偏旁分析法。比較法又包括據(jù)《說文》釋字、據(jù)《說文》古文釋字、據(jù)《說文》重文釋字、據(jù)甲骨文釋字、據(jù)金文釋字、據(jù)璽印、封泥、古錢幣等其他文字釋字幾個方面。二、據(jù)音考釋。分為破通假釋字和據(jù)銘文韻讀釋字兩類。三、據(jù)義釋字。分為據(jù)文獻(xiàn)釋字、據(jù)上下文文意釋字、據(jù)銘文辭例釋字和據(jù)銘文語法釋字幾類。 第三章,《兩周金文辭大系》慣用術(shù)語。主要考察了四種比較常見的、對文字發(fā)展規(guī)律有一定揭示能力的術(shù)語。依次是初文、繁文、省文、異文。對初文的判斷反映郭氏對古文字較早期形體的認(rèn)識。繁文是與漢字簡化發(fā)展規(guī)律相矛盾的一種特殊現(xiàn)象,它始終伴隨著漢字的簡化發(fā)展,值得注意。省文是郭氏為通讀銘文而采用的訓(xùn)詁手段,也反映了郭氏在據(jù)音釋字時憑借的音韻條件。異文最為復(fù)雜,又分為增減筆畫、增減意符、增減聲符、同字異構(gòu)四類。主要體現(xiàn)了文字發(fā)展分化的基本方法。 第四章,《兩周金文辭大系》對前人成果的利用,分為同意前人成果、不同意前人成果、對比前人成果和不管前人成果四大類。體現(xiàn)了《大系》作者立足前賢、謹(jǐn)慎去取、博采眾長的治學(xué)態(tài)度。《大系》雖然征引諸家,卻并不囿于諸家。郭氏對前人成果的利用,主要是為了佐證自己的考釋結(jié)果。通過對《大系》引文的統(tǒng)計,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)絕大部分實(shí)例是郭氏自己考釋的結(jié)果,《大系》一書是郭沫若辛勤研究的結(jié)晶,可以代表其在金文研究方面的觀點(diǎn)。 最后是結(jié)語部分,總結(jié)了全文的觀點(diǎn),并將我們初步探究的結(jié)果與權(quán)威理論作了粗淺的比較,引用權(quán)威學(xué)者的看法對《大系》一書的內(nèi)容作了簡略評述。
[Abstract]:Guo Moruo is a famous modern philologist, he in Oracle, bronze, stone and other ancient writing research results fruitful achievements, and Luo Zhenyu, Wang Guowei, Dong Zuobin known as the "Oracle four hall". However, in the study of inscriptions has epoch-making significance, mainly reflected in the < two weeks on the Department of speech "a book. Taiwan scholar Jiang Shuhui said" gold content of literature can be said to be set up by him. "Two weeks bronzes inscriptions not only created a series of > < > in the Yi image, inscriptions on textual exegesis terms is fruitful. The interpretation of a large number of inscriptions in the book, he the release of inscriptions on bronze for future generations, many scholars admit that the Chinese Dictionary > and < etc tool reference. Research methods, he used in the book of the species richness, diversity, for studying the Jin literature, provides a good example of exegesis, It is worth to inherit and develop. The deep research effort, is based on his profound understanding of "Shuowen >, on the basis of the comprehensive summary of predecessors. The explanation of the text part of our speech," a Book of < two weeks Jinwen made a more comprehensive combing out typical examples, combined with the exegesis science, philology, general theory and the latest achievements in phonology, in the two week of the "series of bronzes inscriptions of" a book in research methods, research methods such as the origin of the term, made a tentative mining.
The full text is composed of three parts: introduction, this theory and conclusion.
The first chapter is the introduction part. The < two weeks series > bronzes inscriptions of the author and his life are briefly introduced, elaborated the special book research significance for the book, and we study the < two week series > bronzes inscriptions are explained briefly. The two week series > bronzes inscriptions of the life and works of Guo Moruo more complex, a lot of controversy, we mainly introduce the research with inscriptions on bronze related academic experience and reasons for other aspects to do that. The two week series of bronzes inscriptions "a book published, because of its age, region, or modify the author, publishing and other reasons, the version is slightly complex. The beginning of the book published in Japan, with < two weeks," as the title of bronzes inscriptions, the author after returning to collate and complement respectively record < two week series of bronzes inscriptions > and < two weeks in > two bronzes inscriptions of series of books, was published in 1957, also named "two weeks of gold large diagram language Recorded in >, and into the map, book and in three. Because of the picture book Yi Bian is a graphic image of the inscription is Yi, only in part of the only text content, so we mainly choose this one as the original research data. For the convenience, which is called < two Zhou Jinwen series of speech ", sometimes referred to as the" big department. In the process of research on the book, mainly adopts inductive classification, statistics and comparison of three kinds of scientific methods.
This theory is the key part of the article, and it is divided into three parts.
絎簩绔，

本文編號：1623469