本文選題：上博簡(jiǎn)　切入點(diǎn)：《凡物流形》　出處：《陜西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：上博簡(jiǎn)《凡物流形》篇得到了不少學(xué)者的重視,很多人討論它的學(xué)派屬性問題,將其歸為道家學(xué)派的觀點(diǎn)影響較大。這種分析法在方法論上有可質(zhì)疑之處。實(shí)際上,《凡物流形》思想來源比較駁雜,說明其作者可能學(xué)習(xí)過不同來源的思想。又《凡物流形》有甲乙兩本,可以表明《凡物流形》流傳比較廣。則其作者在當(dāng)時(shí)至少在一定地域之內(nèi),很可能是比較著名的人,足以自成一家。那么,《凡物流形》所屬的學(xué)派,其名稱就應(yīng)該以此篇的作者為名。
[Abstract]:A lot of scholars have paid attention to the article on "the form of Logistics" in Shangbo slips, and many people have discussed the problem of its school attribute. The idea of classifying it as a Taoist school has a great influence on the methodology. In fact, the source of the thought of "all Logistics forms" is rather complicated. It shows that the author may have studied ideas from different sources, and that there are two copies of "A" and "B", which can indicate that "where the form of logistics" is more widely spread. Then the author was at least within a certain area at that time, and probably was a relatively famous person. The name of the school to which the logistics form belongs should be named after the author of the article.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)國(guó)家起源研究的理論與方法”(12&ZD133);國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年自選項(xiàng)目“新出簡(jiǎn)帛與百家爭(zhēng)鳴的重要論題研究”(12CZS013) 上海085社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)科內(nèi)涵建設(shè)科研項(xiàng)目(20131101)
【分類號(hào)】：K877.5
，

本文編號(hào)：1623387