【摘要】：國(guó)家治理體系的建構(gòu),需要增強(qiáng)人民的主體意識(shí)和主體行為。黑格爾的主體概念強(qiáng)調(diào)了人向主體轉(zhuǎn)變的道德意志和獨(dú)立見(jiàn)解,強(qiáng)調(diào)主體行為的責(zé)任價(jià)值。馬克思批判了黑格爾主體的抽象性,強(qiáng)調(diào)了主體的歷史性和總體性存在。責(zé)任是主體對(duì)自身行為之過(guò)程和后果的負(fù)責(zé)、追問(wèn)、質(zhì)疑乃至處罰,國(guó)家治理中人民主體性應(yīng)該體現(xiàn)在對(duì)國(guó)家和對(duì)個(gè)人兩個(gè)層面上的責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:The construction of national governance system needs to strengthen the people's subjective consciousness and behavior. Hegel's concept of subject emphasizes the moral will and independent view of man's transformation from subject to subject, and emphasizes the value of responsibility of subject's behavior. Marx criticized the abstract nature of Hegel's subject and emphasized the historical and total existence of the subject. Responsibility is the responsibility of the subject for the process and consequences of his own behavior. Questioning, questioning and even punishing, the subjectivity of the people in the governance of the country should be reflected in the responsibility of both the state and the individual.
【作者單位】： 華僑大學(xué)哲學(xué)與社會(huì)發(fā)展學(xué)院、生活哲學(xué)研究中心;華僑大學(xué)政治與公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：福建省社科基地重大項(xiàng)目“唯物史觀與重建社會(huì)生活研究”的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D61;B038

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 潘光;;穆罕默德·阿里改革對(duì)國(guó)家治理的啟示[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2013年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宋靜;21世紀(jì)俄羅斯貧困問(wèn)題及對(duì)策研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：2222098