【摘要】：馬克思恩格斯與赫爾岑、車爾尼雪夫斯基、特卡喬夫、米海洛夫斯基、查蘇利奇、丹尼爾遜等俄國(guó)思想家就俄國(guó)社會(huì)問(wèn)題、俄國(guó)農(nóng)村公社的命運(yùn)問(wèn)題以及俄國(guó)道路問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了長(zhǎng)達(dá)半個(gè)世紀(jì)的對(duì)話。與對(duì)農(nóng)村公社抱有幻想的俄國(guó)民粹派不同,馬克思恩格斯始終根據(jù)俄國(guó)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況研究俄國(guó)問(wèn)題,不僅明確反對(duì)把西歐資本主義起源的歷史概述變成一般發(fā)展道路的歷史哲學(xué)理論,變成一切民族不管它們所處的歷史環(huán)境如何都注定要走的道路,而且指出俄國(guó)與西歐的不同。這不僅影響了19世紀(jì)末20世紀(jì)初期的俄國(guó)革命道路,而且在思想上對(duì)中國(guó)革命、建設(shè)和改革之路也具有重要的啟示作用。
[Abstract]:Marx Engels and other Russian thinkers, such as Herzen, Chernicheevsky, Tkachov, Milowski, Chasulic, Denilson, and other Russian thinkers on Russian social problems, The fate of the Russian rural commune and the Russian road have been in dialogue for half a century. Unlike Russian populists who have fantasized about rural communes, Marx and Engels have always studied the Russian issue according to the reality of Russia's development. It is not only opposed to the historical philosophical theory of turning the historical overview of the origin of capitalism in Western Europe into a general path of development, but also to the road that all nations, no matter what their historical environment, are destined to take, and points out the difference between Russia and Western Europe. This not only affected the Russian revolutionary road in the late 19th century and early 20th century, but also had an important enlightening effect on the road of Chinese revolution, construction and reform.
【作者單位】： 暨南大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D751.2
，

本文編號(hào)：2183652