本文選題：平時指揮權(quán) + 戰(zhàn)時指揮權(quán)　； 參考：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：韓國是世界上唯一一個本國軍隊指揮權(quán)被外國控制的國家。本文將韓國軍隊指揮權(quán)的歸屬變化分為3次轉(zhuǎn)移。第一次發(fā)生于1950年,韓軍指揮權(quán)從韓國政府轉(zhuǎn)移到“聯(lián)合國軍”。第二次發(fā)生于1978年,韓軍指揮權(quán)從“聯(lián)合國軍”轉(zhuǎn)向駐韓美軍。1987年,韓國政府開始提出收回韓軍指揮權(quán),由此開啟韓軍指揮權(quán)的第三次轉(zhuǎn)移。本文又將第三次轉(zhuǎn)移分為移交平時指揮權(quán)與移交戰(zhàn)時指揮權(quán)兩個階段。1994年駐韓美軍向韓國移交了韓軍平時指揮權(quán),第一階段完成;2005年韓國制定收回戰(zhàn)時指揮權(quán)的政策,第二階段開始,至今仍在進(jìn)行。本文詳細(xì)分析了韓軍指揮權(quán)歷次轉(zhuǎn)移的特點與原因。在第三次轉(zhuǎn)移的第二階段中,即在韓國收回戰(zhàn)時指揮權(quán)問題上,盧武鉉政府(2002-2007)制定了積極政策,李明博政府(2007-2012)在收回戰(zhàn)時指揮權(quán)問題上的政策又轉(zhuǎn)向消極,樸槿惠政府(2012至今)又出臺了新政策與方案。通過分析韓國幾屆政府政策變化的原因,可得出韓國對收回戰(zhàn)時指揮權(quán)的積極性與朝鮮半島局勢呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系的結(jié)論,同時,收回戰(zhàn)時指揮權(quán)的政策仍然具有連續(xù)性,不會取消。美韓移交韓軍指揮權(quán),不僅不會削弱美韓同盟,反而改善了美韓同盟的不對稱性,促進(jìn)美韓構(gòu)建新型同盟,從而得出使美韓同盟增強的結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:South Korea is the only country in the world whose military command is under foreign control. In this paper, the change of the Korean military command power is divided into three shifts. The first occurred in 1950, when the Korean military command was transferred from the Korean government to the UN Army. The second time occurred in 1978, when the command of the Korean army changed from the "United Nations" to the US military stationed in Korea. In 1987, the South Korean government began to withdraw the command of the Korean Army, thus opening the third transfer of the command power of the Korean Army. In this paper, the third transfer is divided into two stages: the transfer of peacetime command and the transfer of wartime command. In 1994, the US forces stationed in South Korea handed over the command of the Korean military to South Korea, the first phase was completed. In 2005, South Korea formulated the policy of recovering the command during the war. The second stage began and is still under way. This paper analyzes in detail the characteristics and causes of the successive transfer of the command power of the Korean Army. In the second phase of the third transfer, that is, on the issue of South Korea's repossession of wartime command, the Roh Moo-hyun government (2002-2007) formulated an active policy, while Lee Myung-bak 's government (2007-2012) turned negative on the issue of reclaiming wartime command power. Park Geun-hye 's government (2012 to date) has introduced new policies and programs. By analyzing the reasons for the changes in the policies of several Korean governments, we can draw a conclusion that the initiative of South Korea to recover its wartime command power is positively related to the situation on the Korean Peninsula, and at the same time, the policy of recovering the wartime command power is still continuous. It won't be canceled. The transfer of command power between the United States and South Korea will not weaken the alliance of the United States and South Korea, but will improve the asymmetry of the alliance between the United States and the Republic of Korea, and promote the formation of a new alliance between the United States and South Korea.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D831.26;E312.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 許亮;;解析盧武鉉主義[J];東北亞論壇;2007年04期

2 崔志鷹;;韓美同盟關(guān)系的新變化及未來走向[J];當(dāng)代韓國;2006年04期

3 馮東興;;美韓關(guān)系中的駐韓美軍地位問題[J];當(dāng)代韓國;2011年02期

4 汪偉民;;美韓同盟再定義:一種聯(lián)盟理論的視角[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2006年03期

5 董向榮;;韓國由威權(quán)向民主轉(zhuǎn)變的影響因素[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2007年07期

6 文龍;;太極旗掩映下的韓國軍隊[J];兵器知識;2011年02期

7 夏立平;;論美韓同盟的修復(fù)與擴(kuò)展[J];美國問題研究;2008年00期

8 陳岳;倪海寧;;簡析駐韓美軍“戰(zhàn)略靈活性”的擴(kuò)大[J];亞非縱橫;2007年04期

，

本文編號：2107091