本文選題：城市多民族聚居社區(qū) + 社區(qū)治理　； 參考：《廣西民族大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：居民與政府當局共同建設(shè)社會格局,并共同享有社會建設(shè)成果,已經(jīng)成為社會治理的新方向,而社會治理的中心必須落實到城鄉(xiāng)、社區(qū)。隨著城鎮(zhèn)化進程的演進,越來越多的少數(shù)民族人口跨越族緣、地緣、血緣等界線流入到城市建設(shè)當中,產(chǎn)生了具有民族特殊性的城市多民族聚居社區(qū)。通過剖析城市多民族聚居社區(qū)治理中的居民參與,既可豐富民族學、社會學等相關(guān)學科理論,提升城市多民族聚居社區(qū)治理水平,從而引領(lǐng)城市綜合社會治理能力的全面提升,為解決城市民族公共治理問題提供現(xiàn)實依據(jù)。基于此,本文首先梳理并評價國內(nèi)外的相關(guān)研究成果,總結(jié)學者們在此方面積累的成功經(jīng)驗和存在的不足,提出本文的研究思路與邏輯框架,然后對居民參與和社區(qū)治理等概念與內(nèi)涵加以系統(tǒng)界定,為居民參與城市多民族聚居社區(qū)治理這一主題奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。接下來,通過調(diào)查問卷和深度訪談的方式詳細了解以廣西南寧為代表的多民族聚居社區(qū)的居民如何理解并怎樣參與社區(qū)治理,分析參與價值,同時對參與現(xiàn)狀進行客觀系統(tǒng)的評價。在此基礎(chǔ)上,深度剖析城市多民族聚居社區(qū)治理中居民參與存在的客觀問題,并對可能面臨的現(xiàn)實挑戰(zhàn)進行探究,分析推進我國城市多民族聚居社區(qū)居民共商、共治、共建、共享的社區(qū)治理的改進方向。最后基于美國、新加坡和日本等國家多族群聚居社區(qū)治理實踐,反思我國存在的不足,并借之探尋符合我國實際的城市多民族聚居社區(qū)居民參與可操作性方案,并認為實現(xiàn)我國居民參與多民族聚居社區(qū)社會治理的路徑,主要包括七個方面:即:強化族際間信任網(wǎng)絡(luò)以提高居民歸屬感與政治互信;建設(shè)多語化信息平臺以實現(xiàn)居民參與的信息化與常態(tài)化;培育包容性公共精神以促進居民理性參與和有序參與;構(gòu)建中華民族共同體以突破居民參與集體行為困境;完善基層民族自治制度以擊碎居民參與的體制性障礙;建多元協(xié)商制以達成民族共識基礎(chǔ)實現(xiàn)共商共治;共享參與成果以保障居民參與的民族化與長態(tài)化。
[Abstract]:It has become a new direction of social governance for residents and government authorities to build a social pattern and enjoy the fruits of social construction together, and the center of social governance must be implemented to urban and rural areas and communities. With the evolution of the urbanization process, more and more ethnic minorities cross the boundaries of ethnic, geographical, blood and other boundaries into urban construction, resulting in a multi-ethnic community with ethnic particularity. By analyzing the participation of residents in the governance of multi-ethnic communities, it can enrich the theories of ethnology, sociology and other related disciplines, and promote the level of governance of multi-ethnic communities in cities, thus leading to the overall improvement of the comprehensive social governance ability of cities. To solve the problem of urban national public governance to provide a realistic basis. Based on this, this paper firstly combs and evaluates the related research results at home and abroad, summarizes the successful experiences and shortcomings accumulated by scholars in this field, and puts forward the research ideas and logical framework of this paper. Then, the concept and connotation of residents' participation and community governance are defined systematically, which lays a theoretical foundation for residents' participation in the theme of community governance of multi-ethnic communities in cities. Then, through the way of questionnaire and in-depth interviews, we can understand how the residents of the multi-ethnic communities in Nanning, Guangxi, understand and participate in community governance, and analyze the value of participation. At the same time, the present situation of participation is evaluated objectively and systematically. On this basis, the paper deeply analyzes the objective problems of residents' participation in the governance of multi-ethnic communities in cities, and probes into the practical challenges that may be faced, and analyzes and promotes the co-negotiation, co-governance and co-construction of the residents of multi-ethnic communities in cities in China. Share the direction of community governance improvement. Finally, based on the practice of governance of multi-ethnic communities in the United States, Singapore and Japan, we reflect on the shortcomings of our country, and use it to explore the operable scheme for the participation of residents of multi-ethnic communities in cities in accordance with the reality of our country. It is considered that the path to realize the residents' participation in the social governance of multi-ethnic communities mainly includes seven aspects: strengthening the inter-ethnic trust network to enhance the residents' sense of belonging and political mutual trust; To build a multilingual information platform to realize the informatization and normalization of residents' participation; to foster inclusive public spirit to promote rational and orderly participation of residents; to build a community of the Chinese nation to break through the plight of residents' participation in collective behavior; To improve the grass-roots ethnic autonomy system to break down the institutional barriers to the participation of residents; to build a pluralistic consultation system to reach a national consensus to achieve common understanding to achieve common governance; to share the results of participation in order to ensure that residents participate in the nationalization and long-term.
【學位授予單位】：廣西民族大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D669.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 亓巖;;構(gòu)建全民共建共享的社會治理格局研究[J];人力資源管理;2016年05期

2 曾維和;;共建共享社會治理格局:理論創(chuàng)新、體系構(gòu)筑、實踐推進[J];理論探索;2016年03期

3 周紅云;;全民共建共享的社會治理格局:理論基礎(chǔ)與概念框架[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2016年02期

4 宋學增;藍志勇;;社會管制的全民共建共享機制:一個分析框架[J];經(jīng)濟社會體制比較;2016年02期

5 李珍剛;葉良海;;公共治理中的資源整合與共享問題——基于困局經(jīng)濟學的視角分析[J];財經(jīng)論叢;2016年03期

6 李強;溫飛;;構(gòu)建全民共建共享的社會治理格局[J];前線;2016年02期

7 王思斌;;社會工作在構(gòu)建共建共享社會治理格局中的作用[J];國家行政學院學報;2016年01期

8 周巍;沈其新;;馬克思市民社會理論與當代中國社會治理創(chuàng)新[J];甘肅社會科學;2016年01期

9 龔維斌;;龔維斌:共建共享是基礎(chǔ) 經(jīng)濟建設(shè)是中心 社會建設(shè)是目標[J];中國黨政干部論壇;2015年12期

10 李珍剛;葉良海;;亞里士多德公共治理思想及其啟示[J];學習論壇;2015年09期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 吳越;;服務(wù),而不是掌舵——新公共服務(wù)視角下的政府轉(zhuǎn)型[A];“經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)型與政府轉(zhuǎn)型”理論研討會暨湖北省行政管理學會2010年年會論文集（上）[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 徐倩;;包容性治理：提升社會治理有效性[N];北京日報;2015年

2 李泓冰;;社會治理共建共享重“你”“我”[N];貴州民族報;2015年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 申可君;城市社區(qū)建設(shè)中的居民參與研究[D];華中師范大學;2013年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 王學鋒;城市多民族社區(qū)社會資本對社區(qū)公民參與影響的實證研究[D];蘭州大學;2016年

2 令先;城市民族社區(qū)建設(shè)中的多元主體互動共治問題研究[D];西北師范大學;2014年

3 楊旭輝;國外農(nóng)村社區(qū)：綜合性分析與借鑒[D];華中師范大學;2013年

4 諶書琪;城市社區(qū)自治中居民參與的問題及對策研究[D];中南大學;2013年

，

本文編號：2005004