本文選題：非洲中心 + 尼日利亞�。� 參考：《浙江師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：自1960年獨(dú)立后,基于與非洲大陸各國(guó)各地區(qū)近代共同的歷史經(jīng)歷、泛非主義的思想基礎(chǔ)、在全球國(guó)家中獨(dú)具特色的最大規(guī)模的黑人數(shù)量和巨大的發(fā)展?jié)摿Φ纫蛩?尼日利亞不自覺(jué)地把促進(jìn)非洲的進(jìn)步當(dāng)做自己“天定的命運(yùn)”,其歷任領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人在外交思想中也多把非洲作為本國(guó)外交的核心和基石。不僅如此,經(jīng)過(guò)多年的支持非洲范圍內(nèi)的反殖和反種族隔離斗爭(zhēng),尼日利亞的非洲領(lǐng)袖角色逐漸凸顯,“非洲中心”外交傳統(tǒng)也隨之不僅形成而且得到了極大地加深。1999年民選政府的上臺(tái)是尼日利亞歷史的一個(gè)新階段。尼日利亞自1999年至今的十多年問(wèn)是否依然延續(xù)著非洲中心的外交傳統(tǒng)?如果是,尼日利亞的“非洲中心”外交傳統(tǒng)在1999年后是否有變化,有著什么樣的變化,為什么會(huì)有這些變化,或者這種變化與其對(duì)非洲領(lǐng)袖或非洲大國(guó)地位的追求有什么樣的關(guān)系?這一連串的問(wèn)題成為本文要探究的核心問(wèn)題和要素。為此,在梳理了1999年來(lái)尼日利亞三位總統(tǒng)的外交思想并確認(rèn)尼日利亞依舊延續(xù)著“非洲中心”外交傳統(tǒng)后,本文決定對(duì)15年來(lái)尼國(guó)的主要外交活動(dòng)及其成效進(jìn)行檢索、梳理和分析評(píng)估。借鑒尼前外交部長(zhǎng)甘巴里(Ibarahim A. Gambari)總結(jié)提出并為許多尼國(guó)外交學(xué)者所接受的中心圓環(huán)外交路徑,本文中采用與之類(lèi)似的層次分析法,分西部非洲、非洲大陸和國(guó)際社會(huì)三個(gè)層面并從中選取15年來(lái)尼國(guó)的主要和代表性的外交活動(dòng)進(jìn)行分析,以期得出符合實(shí)際的結(jié)論。在西非部分,本文主要梳理了尼日利亞對(duì)西非地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化和西非地區(qū)沖突干預(yù)的參與情況；在非洲部分,本文主要梳理了尼日利亞在新世紀(jì)以來(lái)參與非統(tǒng)月非盟政治轉(zhuǎn)型、非洲經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化框架的制定和實(shí)施、非洲開(kāi)發(fā)銀行運(yùn)作、非洲大陸沖突與維和等主要的外交活動(dòng)情況；在國(guó)際舞臺(tái)上,本文主要分析了尼日利亞15年來(lái)利用本國(guó)的技術(shù)援助團(tuán)這一工具開(kāi)展外交活動(dòng)的情況、在聯(lián)合國(guó)及其安理會(huì)中開(kāi)展的外交活動(dòng)及其特點(diǎn)、以及在英聯(lián)邦等其他國(guó)際組織中的活動(dòng)情況；在這些梳理之后,本文在各部分的進(jìn)行分析和小結(jié)。在這個(gè)過(guò)程中,本文根據(jù)新問(wèn)題盡量選用新的材料和原始資料來(lái)進(jìn)行探究和歸類(lèi)分析,最終在對(duì)尼國(guó)近15年外交活動(dòng)形成一個(gè)總體認(rèn)知的基礎(chǔ)上,得出本文的最終結(jié)論。本文最終結(jié)論認(rèn)為：自1999年以來(lái),尼日利亞的“非洲中心”外交無(wú)論從其思想政策還是外交活動(dòng)方面來(lái)講都有一定的發(fā)展與轉(zhuǎn)變：即在繼承非洲中心思想的同時(shí)也開(kāi)始意識(shí)到并更加注重尼日利亞自身的國(guó)家利益,開(kāi)始了由理想主義和利他主義向具有現(xiàn)實(shí)主義色彩方向的轉(zhuǎn)變。對(duì)于這種轉(zhuǎn)變,本文分析認(rèn)為：這種轉(zhuǎn)變并不意味著尼日利亞放棄了其對(duì)“非洲領(lǐng)袖／大國(guó)地位”外交目標(biāo)的追求。尼日利亞的非洲中心外交在新世紀(jì)只是在一定程度上轉(zhuǎn)變了其行為的方式,轉(zhuǎn)變了實(shí)現(xiàn)其外交目標(biāo)的方式和路徑,開(kāi)始逐漸通過(guò)追求自身國(guó)家利益和使國(guó)家強(qiáng)大的做法來(lái)來(lái)最終贏得他國(guó)的尊重和認(rèn)可。同時(shí)要認(rèn)識(shí)到,由于受歷史和各種內(nèi)外因素的影響,尼日利亞外交的這種轉(zhuǎn)變遠(yuǎn)未真正的完成,在實(shí)際的表現(xiàn)中并未有十分明顯的或一以貫之的前后區(qū)別,只是帶有“現(xiàn)實(shí)主義色彩”且只是個(gè)“開(kāi)始”。
[Abstract]:Since independence in 1960, based on the common historical experiences of various regions and regions of the African continent, the ideological basis of Pan African doctrine, the largest number of black people and great potential for development in the global countries, Nigeria unconsciously regarded the advancement of Africa as its "destiny". In the diplomatic thought, the leaders also took Africa as the core and cornerstone of its own diplomacy. Not only that, after years of support for the struggle against colonization and anti apartheid in Africa, the role of African leaders in Nigeria became increasingly prominent, and the diplomatic tradition of the "African Center" was not only formed but also greatly deepened.1999 years. The election of the elected government is a new stage in the history of Nigeria. Does Nigeria continue to continue the diplomatic tradition of the African Center in the more than 10 years since 1999? If it is, whether there has been a change in the diplomatic tradition of the "African Center" in Nigeria in 1999, what changes are there, or why this change, or this? What is the relationship between species change and its pursuit of African leaders or African powers? This series of questions become the core issues and elements to be explored in this article. For this reason, after combing the diplomatic ideas of the three presidents of Nigeria in 1999 and confirming that Nigeria continues to continue the diplomatic tradition of the "African Center", this article decides Based on the retrieval, analysis and evaluation of the major diplomatic activities and results of the country in the past 15 years, the central circle of diplomacy accepted by Ibarahim A. Gambari, the former Foreign Minister of the country, was summarized and proposed by many foreign diplomat scholars. This paper adopts a similar analytic hierarchy process, which is divided into western Africa, African continent and country. In the three aspects of the international society, the main and representative diplomatic activities of the country in the next 15 years are analyzed in order to draw the conclusion that is in line with the actual situation. In West Africa, this article mainly combed the participation situation of Nigeria's participation in the economic integration of West Africa and the conflict intervention in West Africa. In the new century, Leah participated in the political transformation of the Au month African Union, the formulation and implementation of the framework of African economic integration, the operation of the African Development Bank, the conflict and peacekeeping of the African continent and other major diplomatic activities. On the international stage, this article mainly analyzed the use of the technical assistance group in Nigeria in the past 15 years. The situation of diplomatic activities, the diplomatic activities and its characteristics in the United Nations and Its Security Council, as well as the activities in other international organizations such as the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. After these combing, the article is analyzed and summarized in various parts. In this process, the article tries to choose new materials and raw materials according to the new problems. On the basis of a general understanding of the diplomatic activities of Nepal in the last 15 years, the final conclusion of this article is concluded. The final conclusion of this paper is that since 1999, the "African Center" diplomacy of Nigeria has been developed and changed in terms of both its ideological and diplomatic activities. At the same time, he began to realize and pay more attention to the national interests of Nigeria, and began to change from idealism and altruism to the direction of realism. In this change, this change does not mean that Nigeria has abandoned its "African leader". In the new century, Nigeria's African Center diplomacy has only changed the way of its behavior, changed the way and path to achieve its diplomatic goals in the new century, and began to gradually win the respect and recognition of his country through the pursuit of its own national interests and the country's strong practice. At the same time, it is necessary to realize that, due to the influence of history and various internal and external factors, this transformation of Nigeria's diplomacy is far from truly completed. There is no obvious or consistent difference in actual performance, only with "realism" and only a "start".

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D843.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉鴻武;“非洲個(gè)性”或“黑人性”——20世紀(jì)非洲復(fù)興統(tǒng)一的神話與現(xiàn)實(shí)[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;2002年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1887792