本文選題：碎片化政府 + 社區(qū)負(fù)擔(dān)��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,隨著社區(qū)建設(shè)的不斷推進(jìn),社區(qū)的負(fù)擔(dān)也越來越沉重,嚴(yán)重制約著社區(qū)工作的有效開展和社區(qū)治理水平的提高,社會(huì)各界要求為社區(qū)減負(fù)增效的呼聲越來越高。只有搞清楚社區(qū)負(fù)擔(dān)為何會(huì)越來越重,才能為我國的社區(qū)建設(shè)找到真正的突破口,才能尋求社區(qū)減負(fù)增效之道。因此,本文圍繞“社區(qū)負(fù)擔(dān)是什么”和“為什么’的問題,從碎片化政府的分析視角來解讀社區(qū)負(fù)擔(dān),以期為社區(qū)減負(fù)增效提供依據(jù)。碎片化政府是指由專業(yè)化分工造成的各部門之間存在隔閡與沖突,陷入溝通和協(xié)調(diào)困境的政府結(jié)構(gòu)。碎片化政府的存在導(dǎo)致政府內(nèi)部管理的效率低下、資源嚴(yán)重浪費(fèi),以及面對(duì)棘手的問題時(shí)束手無策,找不到有效的解決途徑。我國的碎片化政府表現(xiàn)在兩個(gè)方面：縱向的“條線政府”和橫向的“部門政府”,具體來說是縱向各級(jí)政府的權(quán)力分化和橫向各政府部門的職能分化�！皸l線政府”的存在,導(dǎo)致了各級(jí)政府權(quán)、責(zé)、利的沖突,形成了資源配置的碎片化和政策的碎片化,在社區(qū)層面主要表現(xiàn)為權(quán)責(zé)錯(cuò)位、利益沖突、多頭管理、政策執(zhí)行偏差和政策“打架”等問題,加重了社區(qū)負(fù)擔(dān)。“部門政府”的存在,以及各職能部門的“地盤爭奪戰(zhàn)”,導(dǎo)致了部門壟斷的慣性、內(nèi)部協(xié)調(diào)不暢的慣性、行政命令的慣性、部門行政考核的慣性,在社區(qū)層面表現(xiàn)為行政攤派任務(wù)重、社區(qū)干部兼職過多,人均事務(wù)多,臺(tái)賬數(shù)量多,掛牌多、檢查多、信息平臺(tái)多等六多問題,使社區(qū)工作重復(fù)低效。因此,如果不能自上而下的深化行政體制改革,改變條塊分割和部門壟斷,建立整體性政府,轉(zhuǎn)變價(jià)值取向、區(qū)分治理主體的功能邊界、重建治理秩序和創(chuàng)新治理機(jī)制,就不能從根本上解決社區(qū)的負(fù)擔(dān)問題。無論是“江漢模式”、武昌區(qū)的大部制改革還是武漢市社區(qū)減負(fù)九大規(guī)定,以及南京社區(qū)減負(fù)的七項(xiàng)規(guī)定,都只是治標(biāo)之策,在運(yùn)行中必將遇到垂直整合、條條運(yùn)行、部門壟斷的體制性障礙。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous promotion of community construction, the burden of the community is becoming more and more heavy, which seriously restricts the effective development of community work and the improvement of community governance. Only by making clear why the burden of the community is getting heavier and heavier can we find a real breakthrough for the community construction in our country and seek the way to reduce the burden and increase the efficiency of the community. Therefore, this paper focuses on the issues of "what is the burden of the community" and "why', and interprets the burden of the community from the perspective of fragmented government, in order to provide the basis for reducing the burden and increasing the efficiency of the community." Fragmented government refers to the government structure in which there are barriers and conflicts between departments caused by specialized division of labor and fall into the dilemma of communication and coordination. The existence of fragmented government leads to the inefficiency of government internal management, the serious waste of resources, and the lack of solutions to the thorny problems. China's fragmented government is manifested in two aspects: vertical "line government" and horizontal "departmental government", specifically, the vertical power differentiation of all levels of government and the functional differentiation of horizontal government departments. The existence of "line government" has led to conflicts of rights, responsibilities and interests at all levels of government, forming fragmentation of resource allocation and fragmentation of policies. At the community level, it is mainly manifested in power and responsibility dislocation, conflict of interests, and multiple management. Policy implementation bias and policy "fight" and other issues, increased the burden on the community. The existence of "departmental government" and the "turf war" of various functional departments have led to the inertia of department monopoly, the inertia of internal coordination, the inertia of administrative orders, and the inertia of departmental administrative examination. At the community level, there are six problems, such as heavy task of administrative assessment, excessive part-time work of community cadres, more per capita affairs, more accounts, more listings, more checks, more information platforms, and so on, so that community work is duplicated and inefficient. Therefore, if it is not possible to deepen the reform of administrative system from top to bottom, to change the fragmentation and monopoly of departments, to establish a holistic government, to change the orientation of value, to distinguish the functional boundary of the main body of governance, to rebuild the order of governance and to innovate the governance mechanism, Can not fundamentally solve the burden of the community. Whether it is the "Jianghan Model", the reform of the large Ministry system in Wuchang, the nine regulations on community burden reduction in Wuhan, and the seven provisions on community reduction in Nanjing, they are only palliative measures, and will inevitably meet with vertical integration and strip operation in the course of operation. Institutional barriers to sectoral monopolies
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D669.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張國運(yùn);;關(guān)于減輕職工負(fù)擔(dān)問題的思考[J];兵團(tuán)建設(shè);2006年11期

2 朱有鈺;;蘇聯(lián)婦女的三角形負(fù)擔(dān)問題[J];蘇聯(lián)問題參考資料;1989年04期

3 ;農(nóng)民合同外社會(huì)負(fù)擔(dān)問題應(yīng)引起重視[J];黨風(fēng)與廉政;1996年07期

4 ;山西省人民政府財(cái)政廳關(guān)于水地定產(chǎn)及負(fù)擔(dān)問題給運(yùn)城專署的函[J];山西政報(bào);1953年15期

5 ;財(cái)政部關(guān)于函授生聽課往返旅費(fèi)負(fù)擔(dān)問題給晉中專署財(cái)政局的批復(fù)[J];山西政報(bào);1964年09期

6 ;二輕企業(yè)社會(huì)負(fù)擔(dān)重[J];輕工集體經(jīng)濟(jì);1985年06期

7 余寶成 ,劉耀國;國營企業(yè)社會(huì)負(fù)擔(dān)問題的個(gè)案調(diào)查和思考[J];社會(huì);1986年01期

8 陸德明,趙奉軍;中國農(nóng)民的負(fù)擔(dān)問題:一種解釋[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

9 陳云卿;從法學(xué)家的角度看心理合同[J];管理科學(xué)文摘;1996年06期

10 林毅夫，，李周;當(dāng)前我國農(nóng)村的主要問題和對(duì)策[J];黨�？蒲行畔�;1995年09期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 王來英;;談?wù)劤鞘歇?dú)生子女家庭多重瞻養(yǎng)負(fù)擔(dān)問題及其對(duì)策[A];家庭、健康、和諧研討會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

2 黃世銘;;獨(dú)生子女家庭多重贍養(yǎng)負(fù)擔(dān)問題研究[A];家庭、健康、和諧研討會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2005年

3 程華;;讓學(xué)生活潑主動(dòng)地發(fā)展是素質(zhì)教育的靈魂[A];基礎(chǔ)教育理論研究成果薈萃（上卷一）[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前7條

1 句容市實(shí)驗(yàn)高級(jí)中學(xué)校長 王榮佩;過重課業(yè)負(fù)擔(dān)問題也是道德和法律問題[N];江蘇教育報(bào);2010年

2 ;當(dāng)前中國農(nóng)民的負(fù)擔(dān)問題[N];發(fā)展導(dǎo)報(bào);2002年

3 農(nóng)信;漁民負(fù)擔(dān)問題引起廣東省領(lǐng)導(dǎo)高度重視[N];中國特產(chǎn)報(bào);2003年

4 林毅夫;可否解決國企政策性負(fù)擔(dān)問題[N];安徽經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2002年

5 記者 吳永紅;四項(xiàng)舉措減輕企業(yè)負(fù)擔(dān)[N];安徽日報(bào);2009年

6 本報(bào)記者 麥正偉;高度重視扶貧工作 切實(shí)減輕農(nóng)牧民負(fù)擔(dān)[N];西藏日報(bào);2001年

7 本報(bào)記者 鄭亞邦;惠風(fēng)滿洞庭[N];中國紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張啟耀;一個(gè)區(qū)域社會(huì)內(nèi)的農(nóng)民田賦負(fù)擔(dān)問題[D];南開大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 郭婧婧;碎片化政府視角下的社區(qū)負(fù)擔(dān)問題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

2 楊曉東;新時(shí)期農(nóng)民隱性負(fù)擔(dān)問題研究[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1885593