本文選題：銓選 + 取士選官��； 參考：《學術研究》2017年11期

【摘要】：清代科舉取士、銓選舉官,兩者雖同屬選舉,職司卻明顯分別。由于清代銓選多途并進,科舉取士只是其中一途,取士與選官標準既相互聯(lián)系,又有諸多差異。而且科甲出身者得缺,并不似既往人們以為的那樣容易。終清一代,因滿漢復職的設置以及保舉與捐納相伴而行,使得科甲出身者對官場的實際影響受限。此外,晚清因應變局,銓選標準新舊雜糅,朝野力促科舉改革乃至停廢,加之光宣之際實施"獎勵學堂出身",導致后世諸多誤解�？婆e與銓選兩種制度的相互制約與影響,及其隨社會變動而不斷進行調(diào)整的事實,彰顯出制度變革的復雜效應。
[Abstract]:The imperial examination in the Qing Dynasty, the election officer, although the two are elections, their functions are obviously different. Due to the multiple ways of selecting officials in the Qing Dynasty, the imperial examination was only one of them, and the standards of selecting officials were not only related to each other, but also had many differences. Moreover, it is not as easy as it used to be to have a man of KLA origin. In the late Qing Dynasty, due to the restoration of Manchu and Han Dynasty and the concomitant of patronage and donation, the actual influence of Ke Jia people on the official field was limited. In addition, in the late Qing Dynasty, in response to the changes, the standard of public election was mixed up with the old and the new, the government and the opposition urged the imperial examination to reform and even stopped the imperial examination, and the implementation of the "reward school background" at the time of light and propaganda led to many misunderstandings in later generations. The mutual restriction and influence of imperial examination and civil election, as well as the fact that they constantly adjust with social changes, reveal the complex effect of institutional change.
【作者單位】： 中山大學歷史系;
【基金】：中山大學“三大建設”專項資助的階段性成果
【分類號】：D691.3;K249
，

本文編號：1857793