本文選題：美國(guó)　切入點(diǎn)：約翰遜政府　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：第二次世界大戰(zhàn)后,美國(guó)為了爭(zhēng)奪全球利益,與蘇聯(lián)進(jìn)行了長(zhǎng)達(dá)半個(gè)世紀(jì)的冷戰(zhàn),包括墨西哥在內(nèi)的拉丁美洲國(guó)家也逐漸被卷入冷戰(zhàn)的漩渦。古巴革命的成功更是大大改變了拉美地區(qū)的局勢(shì)。美國(guó)一貫將拉美視為"后院",力圖通過政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、軍事等手段左右該地區(qū)的局勢(shì)發(fā)展,而墨西哥長(zhǎng)期奉行"自決"和"不干涉"的外交原則,必然會(huì)與美國(guó)咄咄逼人的對(duì)外戰(zhàn)略產(chǎn)生分歧。約翰遜時(shí)期,美國(guó)的對(duì)外政策遭到墨西哥的公開反對(duì),主要有兩次,一次發(fā)生在1964年美洲國(guó)家組織制裁古巴時(shí),另一次發(fā)生在1965年武裝干涉多米尼加時(shí)。有趣的是,這并未對(duì)兩國(guó)的關(guān)系造成嚴(yán)重的損害。事實(shí)上,約翰遜上任之初,兩國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人既已達(dá)成了不成文的默契:在一些"較小的事務(wù)"上,美國(guó)可以容忍墨西哥的獨(dú)立自主,但在"根本性的事務(wù)"上,墨西哥應(yīng)當(dāng)支持美國(guó)。此后,約翰遜政府對(duì)兩國(guó)對(duì)外政策分歧的應(yīng)對(duì)方式基本上符合了這一精神。本文以美國(guó)的解密檔案為主要依據(jù),考察了約翰遜政府對(duì)此采取較為容忍的態(tài)度的原因。本文由以下部分組成:緒論部分介紹本文的主題、研究意義、材料來源和國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀。正文第一部分,概述美國(guó)對(duì)墨政策的歷史發(fā)展,尤其是冷戰(zhàn)開始后美國(guó)對(duì)兩國(guó)外交分歧的認(rèn)識(shí)與對(duì)策。正文第二部分是本文的主體,首先講述了約翰遜政府與墨西哥初步達(dá)成了默契,接受了墨西哥在根本立場(chǎng)與美國(guó)一致的前提下實(shí)施獨(dú)立的外交政策,接著回顧了約翰遜政府對(duì)兩國(guó)對(duì)外政策的兩次重要分歧所采取的對(duì)策,最后講述了兩國(guó)在應(yīng)對(duì)共產(chǎn)主義和古巴等問題上的合作。正文第三部分總結(jié)了約翰遜政府對(duì)墨西哥某些獨(dú)立的外交政策采取容忍態(tài)度的原因。最后是結(jié)語(yǔ)部分。
[Abstract]:After World War II, the United States fought for global interests with the Soviet Union for half a century of cold war, including Mexico and other Latin American countries are gradually involved in the cold war whirlpool.The success of the Cuban revolution has greatly changed the situation in Latin America.The United States has always regarded Latin America as a "backyard" and has tried to influence the development of the situation in the region through political, economic and military means, while Mexico has long adhered to the diplomatic principles of "self-determination" and "non-interference".There is bound to be disagreement with America's aggressive foreign strategy.In Johnson's time, the foreign policy of the United States met with public opposition from Mexico, mainly on two occasions, one when the Organization of American States (OAS) sanctioned Cuba in 1964, and the other when the armed intervention in the Dominican Republic occurred in 1965.Interestingly, this has not done serious damage to relations between the two countries.In fact, at the beginning of Johnson's presidency, the leaders of the two countries had reached an unwritten tacit understanding: the United States could tolerate Mexico's independence on "smaller matters," but on "fundamental matters,"Mexico should support the United States.Since then, the Johnson administration's response to differences in foreign policy between the two countries has largely been in line with this spirit.Based on the declassified archives of the United States, this paper examines the reasons for the Johnson Administration's tolerant attitude towards this issue.This paper is composed of the following parts: the introduction part introduces the theme, significance, material sources and current research situation at home and abroad.The first part of the text summarizes the historical development of the United States' policy towards Mexico, especially the understanding and countermeasures of the diplomatic differences between the two countries after the beginning of the Cold War.The second part of the text is the main body of this paper, first of all, the Johnson administration and Mexico reached a tacit understanding, accepted Mexico in the fundamental position and the United States under the premise of the implementation of independent foreign policy,Then it reviews the countermeasures taken by the Johnson administration on the two major differences in the foreign policy of the two countries, and finally describes the cooperation between the two countries in dealing with issues such as communism and Cuba.The third part summarizes the reasons for Johnson's tolerance of Mexico's independent foreign policy.The last part is the conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D871.2;D873.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 戴超武;;肯尼迪-約翰遜時(shí)期的外交與第三世界[J];美國(guó)研究;2006年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1724667