本文選題：印度裔群體　切入點：游說　出處：《四川外國語大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)60年代和90年代美國兩度修改移民法以鼓勵技術(shù)性移民遷入。受益于此類改革,在科教方面成就斐然的美國印度裔群體規(guī)模迅速擴(kuò)大,現(xiàn)已形成較大規(guī)模的政治力量。由于其濃烈的故土情結(jié),印裔群體極為熱切地為母國印度的利益在美國政界“奔走呼號”四處游說,影響著美國南亞政策的制定和美印關(guān)系發(fā)展。由此,該群體如何建構(gòu)其政治影響力成為一個亟待研究的問題。本文通過對印裔的群體特點和新世紀(jì)以來的諸多政治表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行研究,提煉并分析了該群體之所以能對外交政策制定產(chǎn)生影響的根本原因。本文第一章探究該群體特點時,較多采用量化分析。各項數(shù)據(jù)呈現(xiàn)出一個坐擁大量財富、政治參與度高且與原籍國藕斷絲連的印裔形象。案例研究貫穿本文的第二,三兩章。新型動員模式——“政治活動委員會”(PAC)模式的采用使得該群體在自2008年以來的“反巴基斯坦”運動取得矚目成效。務(wù)實的游說策略——“結(jié)盟游說”也使得該群體避短揚長,鼓動各利益攸關(guān)方共同游說。憑此策略,印裔群體在2005-2008三年間成功游說美國會通過備受爭議的《美印民用核協(xié)議》。對比分析在本文亦有體現(xiàn)。第二章對比了印裔在80和90年代采用的舊有模式和新型模式的優(yōu)缺點,論證了PAC模式真正促進(jìn)了印裔群體各分散政治勢力的強(qiáng)大聚合。此外,本文還通過比較印裔群體和猶太裔群體的異同,解釋印裔在后者經(jīng)驗基礎(chǔ)之上的策略調(diào)試和創(chuàng)新,并佐證了“結(jié)盟游說”在可預(yù)見未來仍將是印裔群體的必然選擇。經(jīng)研究,可以發(fā)現(xiàn),1)卓越的生態(tài)屬性、2)成熟高效的政治動員模式、3)務(wù)實的游說策略是印裔群體建構(gòu)起強(qiáng)大政治影響力的根本因素;其富有成效的游說促使新世紀(jì)以來美國的南亞政策制定更為偏向印度,并在美印雙邊關(guān)系良性快速發(fā)展發(fā)揮建設(shè)性作用。三者的有效互動,加之印裔人口規(guī)模在美國迅速擴(kuò)大,將使得該群體的游說能力望以色列游說集團(tuán)之項背。
[Abstract]:The United States in 1960s and 90s twice amended the immigration law to encourage technical immigration. Benefit from this kind of reform in science and technology achievements of the India American population has expanded rapidly, has formed a larger political power. Because of its strong native complex, Indian population is very eager for the home India's interest in American politics "lobbying influence go hither and thither to call for" American South Asia policy and India relations development. Therefore, how to construct the political power of the group has become a problem to be solved. Through the research of many political group characteristics and the new century of Indian since the performance, refining and analysis of the group has been able to develop fundamental the impact of foreign policy. In the first chapter, the research group characteristics, more use of quantitative analysis. The data showed a A huge wealth, political participation is high and the country of origin ouduansilian Indian image. A case study through the second, 32 chapters. The new Mobilization Mode -- "political action committee" (PAC) model makes use of the group made remarkable achievements in since 2008 "anti Pakistan movement. Pragmatic lobbying strategy:" alliance lobby "also makes the group short advantage, encouraged to lobby all stakeholders. With this strategy, the Indian group lobbied successfully in 2005-2008 for three years through the controversial" US India civil nuclear deal. Comparative analysis is also reflected in the United States. The second chapter compares the advantages and disadvantages of the old model of India born in 80 and 90s with the new model, demonstrates that the PAC model really promotes strong Indian groups each dispersion polymerization political forces. In addition, this paper also compared the Indian group The similarities and differences between the body and the Jewish community, on the interpretation of Indian experience based strategy adjustment and innovation, and evidence of the "alliance lobby" in the foreseeable future will still be the inevitable choice of the Indian population. The study can be found, 1) the ecological properties of excellence, 2) mature and efficient mode of political mobilization 3), pragmatic strategy is Indian lobbying groups to construct the fundamental factors of strong political influence; their success in lobbying the United States since the new century to develop South Asia policy is more inclined towards India, and the US India bilateral relations benign and rapid development and play a constructive role. The effective interaction between the three, and the Indian population scale to expand rapidly in the United States, will make the community look back the lobbying power of the Israel lobby group.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D835.1;D871.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 滕海區(qū);;論美國印裔族群的政治參與[J];南亞研究;2014年02期

2 蘭江;;美巴關(guān)系中的巴基斯坦代議制政府因素[J];南亞研究季刊;2013年04期

3 滕海區(qū);;論美國印度裔族群的形成及特點[J];美國研究;2013年04期

4 滕海區(qū);;美國印裔族群與印度僑匯的發(fā)展[J];五邑大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期

5 王曉艷;時宏遠(yuǎn);;印度游說集團(tuán):美印關(guān)系的助推器[J];世界知識;2010年07期

6 趙國軍;;試析美國國會“印度連線”及其對美印關(guān)系的影響[J];南亞研究;2008年02期

7 賈海濤,蓋蕾;承認(rèn)雙重國籍:印度國籍立法的重大變化[J];河北法學(xué);2005年09期

，

本文編號：1703532