自然與人性:孟子和莊子道德發(fā)生學(xué)之異同
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-23 10:49
【摘要】：孟子和莊子分別把道德之發(fā)生歸之于自然和人性,承認(rèn)道德的自然屬性。在道德發(fā)生學(xué)問題上,二者的共同特點是"內(nèi)在超越"。然而,孟子和莊子對于人性之自然屬性有不同的判斷,造成了儒、道兩家道德發(fā)生學(xué)的根本分歧。孟子認(rèn)為社會性的善也是內(nèi)在于自然的,可以從本性中求得,同時又以人性與動物本性之不同論證人性在道德屬性方面的優(yōu)越性。莊子認(rèn)為人之道德行為是自然而然的,一旦放在社會價值評價體系下就偏離了內(nèi)在性而導(dǎo)致道德的外在化并進(jìn)而傷害道德的真性。莊子推崇純?nèi)巫匀坏牡赖掳l(fā)生機(jī)制,因此不承認(rèn)人在道德屬性上具有優(yōu)越性。
[Abstract]:Mencius and Zhuangzi attributed the occurrence of morality to nature and humanity, respectively, and recognized the natural attribute of morality. On the issue of moral genesis, the common characteristic of both is "inner transcendence". However, Mencius and Zhuangzi had different judgments on the nature of human nature, which resulted in the fundamental differences between Confucianism and Taoism. Mencius holds that social goodness is also inherent in nature, which can be obtained from nature, and at the same time demonstrates the superiority of human nature in moral attribute with the difference between human nature and animal nature. Zhuangzi thinks that the moral behavior of people is natural, once placed in the social value evaluation system, it deviates from the internality, which leads to the externalization of morality and then damages the truth of morality. Zhuangzi advocates the moral mechanism of pure nature, so he does not admit that man has superiority in moral attribute.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：江蘇省高校優(yōu)勢學(xué)科建設(shè)工程資助項目
【分類號】：B82-092
本文編號：2389881
[Abstract]:Mencius and Zhuangzi attributed the occurrence of morality to nature and humanity, respectively, and recognized the natural attribute of morality. On the issue of moral genesis, the common characteristic of both is "inner transcendence". However, Mencius and Zhuangzi had different judgments on the nature of human nature, which resulted in the fundamental differences between Confucianism and Taoism. Mencius holds that social goodness is also inherent in nature, which can be obtained from nature, and at the same time demonstrates the superiority of human nature in moral attribute with the difference between human nature and animal nature. Zhuangzi thinks that the moral behavior of people is natural, once placed in the social value evaluation system, it deviates from the internality, which leads to the externalization of morality and then damages the truth of morality. Zhuangzi advocates the moral mechanism of pure nature, so he does not admit that man has superiority in moral attribute.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：江蘇省高校優(yōu)勢學(xué)科建設(shè)工程資助項目
【分類號】：B82-092
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 唐勇;;從莊子的“與物為春”說起[J];環(huán)境保護(hù)與循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年04期
2 譚維智;;論莊子對知識在道德教育中的價值的認(rèn)識[J];教育學(xué)報;2010年04期
3 王勇;吳鋒;;莊子忠孝觀的學(xué)理解析[J];孝感學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年02期
4 金銀潤;;莊子的道德:在悖論中尋求解脫[J];遼寧教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年05期
5 許建良;莊子道德實踐思想論[J];零陵學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年09期
6 李故新;;莊子與尼采理想道德人格思想之比較[J];湖南文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年06期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 譚維智;道德減法[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年
2 郭榮君;先秦儒道生死觀研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 閻豐;莊子超道德善惡觀研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2015年
2 吳青貴;對莊子自由思想的倫理解讀[D];長沙理工大學(xué);2013年
，本文編號：2389881
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2389881.html
