【摘要】：目的:了解國內(nèi)心理咨詢領(lǐng)域一對一督導(dǎo)的倫理實踐情況。方法:采用網(wǎng)絡(luò)和紙質(zhì)版兩種方式收集問卷,共獲得高校中臨床與咨詢心理學研究生41人(學校督導(dǎo)組)、參加中美精神分析聯(lián)盟(CAPA)心理動力學培訓的學員38人(CAPA組);采用督導(dǎo)倫理實踐量表(EPSS)進行調(diào)查。EPSS分為兩部分,分別調(diào)查督導(dǎo)師的倫理實踐狀況和當督導(dǎo)者言行不符合倫理或不專業(yè)時對被督導(dǎo)者的消極影響。結(jié)果:在倫理實踐狀況中,兩組有7個條目評分差異有統(tǒng)計學意義,學校督導(dǎo)組在保證督導(dǎo)時間、開放地討論倫理問題、不做被督導(dǎo)者的咨詢師方面得分低于CAPA組,而在現(xiàn)場督導(dǎo)、查看被督導(dǎo)者咨詢的錄像錄音、告知來訪者接受督導(dǎo)、與督導(dǎo)簽署知情同意協(xié)議方面得分高于CAPA組(均P0.05)。在第二部分中,55%以上的被督導(dǎo)者認為如果督導(dǎo)所為不符合倫理時會消極地影響他們對督導(dǎo)者和督導(dǎo)聯(lián)盟的看法,并且將近50%的被督導(dǎo)者也認為會影響自己的情緒和對來訪者咨詢的質(zhì)量。結(jié)論:一對一督導(dǎo)師在監(jiān)督被督導(dǎo)者的表現(xiàn)和專業(yè)活動實踐情況,保持適當?shù)膶I(yè)界限方面做得較好;但在定期查看被督導(dǎo)者咨詢的錄音、錄像等具體方面所做尚有待改進。
[Abstract]:Objective: to understand the ethical practice of one-to-one supervision in the field of psychological counseling in China. Methods: a total of 41 graduate students of clinical and counseling psychology (school supervision group) and 38 participants (CAPA group) of (CAPA) psychodynamics training in Sino American Psychoanalysis League were collected by network and paper version. EPSS is divided into two parts to investigate the status of the supervisor's ethical practice and the negative influence on the supervised person when the supervisor's words and deeds are not ethical or professional. Results: in the practice of ethics, there were significant differences in the scores of seven items between the two groups. The score of school supervision group was lower than that of CAPA group in terms of ensuring supervision time, discussing ethical issues openly, and not being counsellors of the supervised group, and the score of the school supervision group was lower than that of the CAPA group. On the spot supervision, check the video recording of the supervised person, tell the visitor to accept the supervision, and sign the informed consent agreement with the supervisor, the score is higher than that of the CAPA group (P0.05). In the second part, more than 55% of the supervisors think that if the supervisors do not conform to ethics, they will negatively affect their views on the supervisors and the steering alliance. And nearly 50% of the supervisors also thought it would affect their emotions and the quality of their consultation with visitors. Conclusion: one to one supervisor has done well in supervising the performance and practice of professional activities and maintaining proper professional boundaries, but there is still room for improvement in such specific aspects as regular viewing of audio and video recordings and so on.
【作者單位】： 北京大學心理與認知科學學院 行為與心理健康北京市重點實驗室;
【分類號】：B82-054

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 胡成廣,劉艷娟;論倫理理論與倫理實踐轉(zhuǎn)換之橋[J];齊齊哈爾社會科學;1991年05期

2 薛勇民;;論環(huán)境倫理實踐的歷史嬗變與當代特征[J];晉陽學刊;2013年04期

3 陳思銘;;空間視域下的孟子倫理實踐美[J];文教資料;2012年26期

4 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 謝鴻飛;規(guī)則為何流浪[N];人民法院報;2001年

，

本文編號：2379461