【摘要】：伊格爾頓認(rèn)為,康德的道德法則僅僅在形式而不是內(nèi)容上模仿了審美,他還在拉康思想的啟發(fā)之下將康德義務(wù)論倫理學(xué)歸入"象征界倫理學(xué)",因?yàn)槟欠N純粹形式的道德律近似于拉康的象征界秩序�？档路磳�(duì)英國經(jīng)驗(yàn)主義基于摹仿的倫理觀念,但伊格爾頓指出,康德那種純粹形式主義的倫理觀念對(duì)現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的影響是南轅北轍的,抽象法則不是人類的目的,人的價(jià)值應(yīng)當(dāng)像藝術(shù)品一樣,既是類存在也是個(gè)體存在。道德法則、美學(xué)以及人本身,這三者只以自身為目的。最終伊格爾頓提出,考察文學(xué)藝術(shù)的美學(xué)與人類學(xué)價(jià)值,必須重返亞里士多德的倫理學(xué)思想。
[Abstract]:Eagleton believes that Kant's moral law imitates aesthetics only in form and not in content, and he also classifies Kant's theory of duty ethics as "symbolic ethics" under the inspiration of Lacan's thought. For that pure form of moral law approximates to the symbolic order of Lacan. Kant opposed British empiricism based on imitating ethics, but Eagleton pointed out that Kant's purely formalistic ethics had a different impact on modern society, and that abstract rules were not the aim of human beings. Human value should be like art, both class existence and individual existence. Moral law, aesthetics and man themselves are all for their own ends. Finally, Eagleton put forward that to study the aesthetic and anthropological value of literature and art, we must return to Aristotle's ethical thought.
【作者單位】： 溫州大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國博士后基金(2015M581961)
【分類號(hào)】：B82-091
，

本文編號(hào)：2345278