發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-24 17:45

  本文選題：黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì) + 法治�。� 參考：《中共中央黨�！�2016年博士論文

【摘要】：提高領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部運(yùn)用法治思維和法治方式治國(guó)理政的能力是當(dāng)前法治中國(guó)建設(shè)的重點(diǎn)領(lǐng)域和基本內(nèi)容,加強(qiáng)黨的紀(jì)律檢查機(jī)關(guān)各級(jí)各部門工作人員運(yùn)用法治思維和法治方式反對(duì)腐敗的能力是其中的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)。黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)方式法治化是依法治國(guó)和依法執(zhí)政的必然要求,是反腐敗工作不斷提高法治化程度的重中之重。本文對(duì)黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)方式的法治進(jìn)路進(jìn)行探究,旨在為黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)及其方式的進(jìn)一步研究提供資料和素材,為法治反腐的有效開展提供理論支撐,為依法治國(guó)和政治體制改革盡綿薄之力。本文采用如下研究方法:1.文本分析法。本文對(duì)《中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨紀(jì)律檢查委員會(huì)案件檢查工作條例》及其《實(shí)施細(xì)則》、《黨的紀(jì)律檢查機(jī)關(guān)案件審理工作條例》、《中共中央紀(jì)律檢查委員會(huì)關(guān)于審理黨員違紀(jì)案件工作程序的規(guī)定》、《中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨紀(jì)律處分條例》等黨內(nèi)法規(guī)和《憲法》、《立法法》、《刑事訴訟法》等國(guó)家法律、法規(guī)和相關(guān)司法解釋進(jìn)行全面系統(tǒng)分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上分析黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)具體方式的合法性與合理性。2.理論分析法。本文在深入分析黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)方式、法治含義、執(zhí)紀(jì)權(quán)和執(zhí)紀(jì)行為的性質(zhì)等問(wèn)題,綜合運(yùn)用了理論法學(xué)的分析論證方式,提出了黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)四項(xiàng)內(nèi)容、法治十二項(xiàng)要件和黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)二重性等一系列理論。3.歷史分析法。本文運(yùn)用歷史分析的方法,以中華人民共和國(guó)成立和文化大革命結(jié)束為節(jié)點(diǎn),逐一分析三個(gè)時(shí)期的時(shí)代背景、執(zhí)紀(jì)權(quán)重、執(zhí)紀(jì)主體和執(zhí)紀(jì)方式等問(wèn)題。從歷史的角度考察黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)的淵源,勾勒出黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)從孕育、萌芽、發(fā)展、挫折到成熟和相對(duì)完善的歷史進(jìn)程,為研究提供深厚的歷史基礎(chǔ)。4.案例分析法。通過(guò)分析現(xiàn)實(shí)中具體的黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)案件,為研究提供現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù)。本文在現(xiàn)有法學(xué)理論和法治理論基礎(chǔ)上小心求證,不墨守成規(guī),求新圖變,提出了一些創(chuàng)造性的理論成果。第一,首次對(duì)黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)法治化的內(nèi)涵問(wèn)題做了系統(tǒng)介紹。筆者將黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)法治化放在依法治國(guó)、依法執(zhí)政、依法執(zhí)紀(jì)、加強(qiáng)黨的執(zhí)政能力建設(shè)、以法治思維和法治方式反對(duì)腐敗的大背景下進(jìn)行研究,將黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)方式理論化,提出了黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)方式的四項(xiàng)內(nèi)容:(1)執(zhí)紀(jì)權(quán)、執(zhí)紀(jì)行為的性質(zhì)問(wèn)題;(2)執(zhí)紀(jì)的依據(jù)、準(zhǔn)則問(wèn)題;(3)黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)與國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)法的關(guān)系,包括與國(guó)家執(zhí)行政紀(jì)的關(guān)系和刑事司法的關(guān)系;(4)黨內(nèi)違紀(jì)案件調(diào)查和審理的具體方式。第二,本文對(duì)中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨及黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)權(quán)的性質(zhì)做了嘗試性探索。執(zhí)紀(jì)權(quán)屬于中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨權(quán)力的一種,如果對(duì)執(zhí)紀(jì)權(quán)進(jìn)行深入法學(xué)解析,就必須對(duì)中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的法律性質(zhì)進(jìn)行深入探討。關(guān)于中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)、執(zhí)政權(quán)和依法執(zhí)政問(wèn)題有很多優(yōu)秀的研究成果,筆者在這些優(yōu)秀成果的基礎(chǔ)上,首先分析政黨的法律主體類型歸屬,論證在當(dāng)前中國(guó)的情況下中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨兼具機(jī)關(guān)、公法社團(tuán)、私法社團(tuán)三重屬性,其次論證黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)權(quán)具公權(quán)力屬性和私權(quán)力屬性二重性,最后論證黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)行為具有民事行為屬性和特別權(quán)力關(guān)系中的支配行為屬性二重性。第三,首次對(duì)黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)的規(guī)范體系進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)梳理。黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)的規(guī)范體系分為兩個(gè)部分,一是直接規(guī)范體系,即與黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)相關(guān)的黨內(nèi)法規(guī)體系;二是間接規(guī)范體系,即與黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)相關(guān)的國(guó)家法體系。黨內(nèi)法規(guī)體系是黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)的最主要規(guī)范體系,筆者對(duì)黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)黨內(nèi)法規(guī)體系進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)梳理,提出該體系存在的黨內(nèi)法規(guī)性質(zhì)不明、與國(guó)家法偶有沖突和保密過(guò)度等問(wèn)題,并逐項(xiàng)分析法治進(jìn)路。第四,首次對(duì)黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)與國(guó)家刑事司法的管轄競(jìng)合問(wèn)題做出系統(tǒng)分析。黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)與國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)法的關(guān)系是黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)方式的重要內(nèi)容之一,與黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)相關(guān)的國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)行為包括行政監(jiān)察和刑事司法,鑒于黨的紀(jì)檢機(jī)關(guān)與行政監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)已合署辦公,兩者關(guān)系基本理順,黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)與國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)法的關(guān)系僅剩下黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)與刑事司法管轄競(jìng)合問(wèn)題。文章全面分析了管轄競(jìng)合的范圍、條件、原因、處理方式和引發(fā)的問(wèn)題,并提出相應(yīng)的法治進(jìn)路。第五,對(duì)黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)具體的調(diào)查和審理方式進(jìn)行合法性與合理性分析,包括限制人身自由、查封扣押凍結(jié)財(cái)物、強(qiáng)制被調(diào)查人供述和要求知情人協(xié)助調(diào)查等調(diào)查方式,和書面審理、有限獨(dú)立審理、審理救濟(jì)方式和保密審理等審理方式。如此系統(tǒng)逐項(xiàng)分析黨內(nèi)執(zhí)紀(jì)方式的合法性與合理性在學(xué)界中是前所未有的。
[Abstract]:Improving the ability of leading cadres to use the rule of law thinking and the rule of law is the key area and basic content of the construction of the rule of law in China. It is the key link to strengthen the ability of the staff at all levels to use the rule of law thinking and the rule of law to combat corruption. The inevitable requirement of the rule of law and the rule of law is the most important thing for the anti corruption work to improve the degree of the rule of law. This article probes into the rule of law in the way of Party discipline, which aims to provide information and material for further study of the party's discipline and its way, to provide theoretical support for the effective development of the rule of law against corruption and to govern the country by law and administration according to law. The following research methods are adopted in this paper: the 1. text analysis method. This article is on the regulations of the examination of cases of the disciplinary inspection committee of the Communist Party of China and the rules for its implementation, the regulations on the trial of cases of the party's disciplinary inspection authorities, and the procedures of the disciplinary inspection committee of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on hearing cases of Party members' violation of discipline. The rules of the party, the regulations of the disciplinary sanction of the Communist Party of China, and other party laws and regulations, the constitution, the legislative law, the criminal procedure law and other national laws, regulations and relevant judicial interpretations are systematically analyzed. On this basis, the.2. theory and analysis method of the legality and rationality of the specific methods in the party is analyzed. This article is in depth analysis of the way of inner-party discipline, The meaning of the rule of law, the nature of the enforcement of discipline and discipline, and the comprehensive use of the analytical method of theoretical jurisprudence, put forward a series of theoretical.3. historical analysis methods, such as four contents of inner-party discipline, twelve elements of the rule of law and the duality of inner-party discipline. This article uses the method of historical analysis to establish People's Republic of China and culture. The end of the revolution is the node, analyzing the times background of the three periods, the weight of the discipline, the subject of discipline and the way of discipline. From the historical point of view, the origin of the inner-party discipline is examined, and the history of the inner-party discipline from breeding, germination, development, setback to maturity and relatively perfect, provides a profound historical basis for the study of.4. cases. Through the analysis of the specific internal party discipline cases in reality, this paper provides a practical basis for the study. In this paper, on the basis of the existing legal theory and the theory of the rule of law, it is careful to seek evidence, not to be conservative, to seek new drawings, and to put forward some creative theoretical results. First, the first is a systematic introduction to the connotation of the rule of law in the party. The rule of law inner-party discipline should be put on the rule of law, in power according to law, to discipline the discipline according to law, to strengthen the party's ruling ability, to study under the background of the rule of law thinking and the rule of law against corruption, and to theorize the inner-party discipline mode, and put forward four contents of the party's discipline mode: (1) the nature of the enforcement of discipline and discipline; (2) the rule of discipline. 3. (3) the relationship between the inner-party discipline and the law enforcement of the state organs, including the relationship with the state and the criminal justice; (4) the specific way of investigating and hearing the cases of inner-party violation of discipline. Second, this article has made an attempt to explore the nature of the Communist Party of China and the party's right to discipline the party. If we analyze the right of discipline in depth, we must discuss the legal nature of the Communist Party of China. There are many outstanding achievements in the leadership of the Communist Party of China, the power of ruling and the problem of ruling by law. On the basis of these outstanding achievements, the author first analyzes the type of the party's legal subject type and proves it Under the current situation of China, the Communist Party of China has three attributes of both organs, public law societies and private law societies. Secondly, it demonstrates the duality of public power and private power in the party. Finally, it proves that the inner-party discipline has the duality of the attribute of civil behavior and the attribute of the supporting behavior in the special power relationship. Third, for the first time to the party. The standard system of discipline is systematically combed. The standard system of inner-party discipline is divided into two parts, one is the direct standard system, that is, the inner-party regulation system related to the inner-party discipline; the two is the indirect standard system, that is, the national law system related to the inner-party discipline. The inner-party regulation system is systematically combed, the inner-party laws and regulations are unidentified, the conflict with the state law and the excessive secrecy are analyzed, and the rule of law is analyzed item by item. Fourth, it is the first time to make a systematic analysis of the concurrence between the party discipline and the national criminal justice. It is one of the important contents of the inner-party discipline mode. The state organs related to the inner-party discipline include administrative supervision and criminal justice. In view of the joint office of the party's disciplinary inspection organs and the administrative supervision organs, the relationship between the two is basically straightened out, and the relationship between the party discipline and the law enforcement of the state organs is only the concurrence of inner-party discipline and criminal jurisdiction. The article comprehensively analyzes the scope, conditions, reasons, ways of handling and problems arising from jurisdictional concurrence, and puts forward the corresponding approaches to the rule of law. Fifth, the analysis of the legality and rationality of the specific investigation and trial mode of inner-party discipline, including restriction of personal freedom, seizure and seizure of frozen property, mandatory confession and requirement to be informed It is unprecedented in the academic world to analyze the legality and rationality of the inner-party discipline.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中共中央黨校
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D262.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李天昊;;沉默權(quán)與供述義務(wù)的取舍——兼論我國(guó)的刑事司法實(shí)踐[J];中共寧波市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

2 李天昊;;關(guān)于中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨黨紀(jì)“兩規(guī)”措施的若干問(wèn)題[J];桂海論叢;2015年06期

3 陳海燕;;紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)法治反腐的困境與對(duì)策[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué)論壇;2015年01期

4 魏建文;信華;;法治反腐的推進(jìn)思路及方法[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年06期

5 江國(guó)華;韓玉亭;;法治反腐策略研究[J];廉政文化研究;2014年06期

6 黃文藝;;論依法執(zhí)政基本內(nèi)涵的更新[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2014年05期

7 張文顯;;法治與國(guó)家治理現(xiàn)代化[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2014年04期

8 汪習(xí)根;;論法治中國(guó)的科學(xué)含義[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2014年02期

9 江必新;王紅霞;;法治社會(huì)建設(shè)論綱[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年01期

10 李永忠;;補(bǔ)短板的“兩規(guī)”,沒(méi)有兩頭甜[J];廉政w，

本文編號(hào)：2062413