本文關(guān)鍵詞： 國有企業(yè) 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部 問責(zé)制 監(jiān)督　出處：《江蘇大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中共十八屆六中全會提出全面從嚴治黨,要求在國有企業(yè)中,尤其要以“嚴”字當(dāng)頭,切實抓好相關(guān)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè),適應(yīng)全面從嚴治黨的要求。以對領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的權(quán)力制約作為發(fā)展黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè)的切入點,從嚴治理企業(yè)內(nèi)部的貪污腐敗問題。在我國現(xiàn)階段國有企業(yè)的發(fā)展過程中,由于對擁有較大權(quán)力的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的相關(guān)監(jiān)督問責(zé)機制不健全,使得企業(yè)內(nèi)部的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部無法抵制誘惑,最終跌入腐敗甚至犯罪的深淵,造成國有企業(yè)內(nèi)部保值增長的國有資產(chǎn)大量流失。因此,對領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的不當(dāng)行為進行監(jiān)督問責(zé)勢在必行。目前我國關(guān)于問責(zé)制相關(guān)的研究,主要集中在政府、國家機關(guān)等行政領(lǐng)域。而與較為完善的行政問責(zé)制研究相比,國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部問責(zé)機制的研究還處于剛開始的探索和起步階段。在深入開展調(diào)查研究的基礎(chǔ)上,闡述了相關(guān)概念和理論基礎(chǔ),包括國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部問責(zé)機制的概念、馬克思的企業(yè)理論、人民主權(quán)理論、分權(quán)制衡理論以及程序正義理論。在此基礎(chǔ)上,明確了國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部問責(zé)制的責(zé)任體系,全面分析了來自國有企業(yè)內(nèi)外部的監(jiān)督問責(zé)機構(gòu)對國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的監(jiān)督問責(zé)的現(xiàn)狀,剖析了國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部問責(zé)監(jiān)督機制在實踐中出現(xiàn)的相關(guān)問題,讓人們進一步認識到建立健全國有企業(yè)的相關(guān)問責(zé)機制對于防范國有企業(yè)中領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部違法行使權(quán)力的重要作用,客觀地分析和總結(jié)了問責(zé)制在實踐中產(chǎn)生困境的原因,完善問責(zé)制度,規(guī)范國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的行為。在對美國、德國、法國等國家國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人員監(jiān)督問責(zé)機制進行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)了這些國家相關(guān)制度方面的有利經(jīng)驗并立足于我國特有的政治制度,提出了對國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部問責(zé)機制的優(yōu)化設(shè)計:一是構(gòu)建思想道德教育的預(yù)防機制,強化國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的政治、道德、法律以及業(yè)務(wù)方面的素質(zhì)教育,推進國有企業(yè)在廉潔治理方面的文化建設(shè);二是完善問責(zé)方面立法,通過完善外部法律法規(guī)制度來保障問責(zé)制的執(zhí)行;三是構(gòu)建內(nèi)外并重的問責(zé)機制,完善問責(zé)主體內(nèi)外部的銜接,確保問責(zé)的執(zhí)行力;四是強化問責(zé)制追究機制,明確其職權(quán)劃分、規(guī)范問責(zé)制的程序、擴大問責(zé)的范圍,通過加強各方面監(jiān)督問責(zé)機制的責(zé)任追究力度,依照黨的紀律、法律規(guī)定嚴肅查處國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的違紀違法行為,最終實現(xiàn)問責(zé)的效果。
[Abstract]:The sixth Plenary session of the 18 Central Committee of the Communist Party of China put forward a comprehensive and strict administration of the party, and demanded that in state-owned enterprises, in particular, the word "strict" should be used at the head, and the party style and clean government of the relevant leading cadres should be conscientiously carried out. To meet the requirements of comprehensive and strict administration of the Party, to take the power restriction of leading cadres as the starting point for the development of a clean and honest party style, and to strictly deal with the problem of corruption within enterprises. In the process of the development of state-owned enterprises in our country at the present stage, As the relevant supervisory and accountability mechanisms for leading cadres with greater power are not perfect, leading cadres within enterprises are unable to resist the temptation and eventually fall into the abyss of corruption or even crime. Therefore, it is imperative to supervise and hold accountable the misconduct of leading cadres. At present, the research on the accountability system in our country is mainly focused on the government. Compared with the more perfect research on administrative accountability, the research on the accountability mechanism of leading cadres in state-owned enterprises is still in the initial stage of exploration and starting. On the basis of in-depth investigation and research, The related concepts and theoretical basis are expounded, including the concept of the accountability mechanism of leading cadres in state-owned enterprises, Marx's enterprise theory, the theory of people's sovereignty, the theory of separation of powers and checks and balances, and the theory of procedural justice. This paper clarifies the responsibility system of leading cadres' accountability in state-owned enterprises, and comprehensively analyzes the present situation of supervision and accountability of leading cadres of state-owned enterprises by supervision and accountability institutions from inside and outside state-owned enterprises. This paper analyzes the problems related to the accountability and supervision mechanism of leading cadres in state-owned enterprises in practice. Let people further realize the important role of establishing and perfecting the relevant accountability mechanism of state-owned enterprises to prevent the leading cadres from exercising their power illegally in state-owned enterprises, and objectively analyze and summarize the reasons for the predicament of accountability system in practice. Improving the accountability system and standardizing the behavior of leading cadres in state-owned enterprises. On the basis of an analysis of the supervisory and accountability mechanisms for the leaders of state-owned enterprises in the United States, Germany, France, and other countries, This paper summarizes the beneficial experiences of the relevant systems in these countries and puts forward the optimal design of the accountability mechanism of the leading cadres in state-owned enterprises based on the unique political system of our country. The first is to construct the preventive mechanism of ideological and moral education. To strengthen the political, moral, legal and professional quality education of the leading cadres of state-owned enterprises, and to promote the cultural construction of clean governance in state-owned enterprises; and second, to improve the legislation on accountability, Through perfecting the external laws and regulations system to ensure the implementation of accountability system; third, to build both internal and external accountability mechanism, improve the internal and external accountability of the interface to ensure the implementation of accountability; fourth, strengthen accountability mechanism, To clarify the division of their functions and powers, to standardize the procedures for accountability, to expand the scope of accountability, to strictly investigate and deal with violations of discipline and law by leading cadres of state-owned enterprises, in accordance with the Party's discipline and in accordance with the Party's discipline, by strengthening the accountability mechanism for all aspects of supervision and accountability. Finally, the effect of accountability is realized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D262.6

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 傅躍華,程艷;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部法律素質(zhì)調(diào)查報告[J];中國司法;2000年12期

2 黃煥泉;淺談企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的“言傳身教”[J];疏導(dǎo);2000年S1期

3 ;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的為“人”之道[J];理論與改革;2001年02期

4 楊本貞;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的禁忌[J];發(fā)展論壇;2001年01期

5 裴建國;對企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部搞好學(xué)習(xí)的幾點思考[J];勝利油田黨校學(xué)報;2002年03期

6 陳開起;處理好四個關(guān)系 塑造企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部新形象[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報);2003年03期

7 楊仁智;;淺談如何對企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部進行有效監(jiān)督[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報);2006年03期

8 董成瑞;張峰;吳金英;譚海光;;加強企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部作風(fēng)建設(shè)的思考[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報);2008年04期

9 甄陳;;要大力提升企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的影響力[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報);2009年01期

10 李彩琴;;當(dāng)前企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部廉潔自律方面存在的突出問題及其對策[J];內(nèi)蒙古煤炭經(jīng)濟;2012年08期

相關(guān)會議論文 前6條

1 林明珠;;《論企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的創(chuàng)造性素質(zhì)》[A];全國第六屆心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議文摘選集[C];1987年

2 秦毓釗;王平;;加強國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部廉潔自律工作的幾點思考[A];為西部大開發(fā)青海大發(fā)展保駕護航論文集[C];2000年

3 王友平;;國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部急需增強的幾種思想意識[A];探索·創(chuàng)新·實踐——“福煉杯”企業(yè)思想政治工作優(yōu)秀成果匯編[C];2004年

4 李積全;;應(yīng)強化部門和企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的審計意識[A];審計論文選編[C];1996年

5 趙曉文;;切實加強國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部建設(shè)[A];聊城市國有企業(yè)改革與發(fā)展理論研討會優(yōu)秀論文論文集[C];2001年

6 黃友農(nóng);;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部要特別重視“官德”修養(yǎng)[A];共鑄誠信——福建省企業(yè)道德建設(shè)經(jīng)驗匯編[C];2003年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 周澤小;湖北新任大型企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部接受廉政談話[N];中國紀檢監(jiān)察報;2007年

2 姚國勇;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部設(shè)立聯(lián)系點好[N];蚌埠日報;2009年

3 陜西省物資產(chǎn)業(yè)集團 邢波;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的必修課[N];現(xiàn)代物流報;2012年

4 河北鋼鐵集團礦業(yè)有限公司龍煙礦山分公司 屈玉文;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部要善于抓工作落實[N];河北經(jīng)濟日報;2013年

5 冀中能源峰峰礦業(yè)集團 陳紅穎;淺談保持國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部純潔性[N];河北經(jīng)濟日報;2013年

6 永定莊煤業(yè)公司 張海林;淺談企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部如何實現(xiàn)快樂工作[N];山西黨校報;2012年

7 王體倫;加強企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部廉潔自律的對策[N];安徽日報;2002年

8 李建能;淺談加強企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部科學(xué)執(zhí)政建設(shè)[N];海南農(nóng)墾報;2005年

9 溫小瑩 作者系金波農(nóng)場黨委副書記;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部應(yīng)具備“十大素養(yǎng)”[N];海南農(nóng)墾報;2005年

10 銅陵有色金屬集團控股公司 汪長進;企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部廉潔自律的對策[N];安徽經(jīng)濟報;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 吳玲;國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部問責(zé)制研究[D];江蘇大學(xué);2017年

2 冉強;中央企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部職業(yè)道德建設(shè)研究[D];東北石油大學(xué);2014年

3 姜志剛;國有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部績效考評與激勵機制研究[D];西北工業(yè)大學(xué);2000年

，

本文編號：1515355