電力數(shù)據(jù)與經(jīng)濟(jì)數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量比較分析——基于Benford法則的評(píng)價(jià)
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-01 10:40
本文選題:電力數(shù)據(jù) + 經(jīng)濟(jì)數(shù)據(jù); 參考:《調(diào)研世界》2016年10期
【摘要】:針對(duì)目前電力增長(zhǎng)波幅與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)偏離現(xiàn)象,本文依據(jù)Benford數(shù)字分布規(guī)則對(duì)地方GDP、工業(yè)增加值、用電量數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量進(jìn)行了檢測(cè)。分析結(jié)果顯示,這些數(shù)據(jù)的數(shù)字分布均符合Benford法則。因此,本文認(rèn)為應(yīng)重點(diǎn)從產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、產(chǎn)品結(jié)構(gòu)、行業(yè)周期上解釋電力增長(zhǎng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)偏差大的問題,而非歸咎于數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:In view of the deviation between the amplitude of electric power growth and economic growth, the quality of local data of Benford, industrial added value and electricity consumption is measured according to the Benford digital distribution rules. The results show that the numerical distribution of these data conforms to the Benford rule. Therefore, this paper holds that the problem of big deviation between electric power growth and economic growth should be explained from industrial structure, product structure and industry cycle, rather than from data quality.
【作者單位】: 國(guó)網(wǎng)能源研究院經(jīng)濟(jì)與能源供需研究所;
【基金】:國(guó)家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“產(chǎn)城融合視閾下穩(wěn)步城鎮(zhèn)化與新生代農(nóng)民就業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型協(xié)同機(jī)制研究”(13AJY008)
【分類號(hào)】:F426.61;F124
,
本文編號(hào):1829015
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/qiyeguanlilunwen/1829015.html
最近更新
教材專著