發(fā)布時間：2018-05-31 10:42

  本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán) + 默示許可�。� 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可的成立多數(shù)情況是通過作品的使用人提出明確的要約,版權(quán)人隨后作出默示的意思而成立；少數(shù)情況是由版權(quán)人發(fā)出明示“授權(quán)要約”,而使用人以實(shí)際使用行為作出默示的承諾而成立。網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可不管是如何成立,就其本質(zhì)而言,就是一種版權(quán)許可合同。這種版權(quán)許可合同與法定許可合同、強(qiáng)制許可合同等“非自愿許可合同”不同,網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可合同成立前考慮到了網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)人對于是否禁止他人未經(jīng)使用進(jìn)行了考量,網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)人有選擇的余地,所以是一種“自愿性質(zhì)的版權(quán)許可合同"。在當(dāng)前網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息時代,確立網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可有其必要性及可行性,同時更有利于平衡社會公眾利益和版權(quán)人的利益,促進(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展。通過中美網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可的法律實(shí)踐研究,美國司法實(shí)踐中在搜索引擎服務(wù)的默示許可中得到的“知曉使用”和“鼓勵使用”原則是值得我國司法實(shí)踐中法官進(jìn)行個案判斷來借鑒的。國內(nèi)關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)的默示許可的問題包括：適用范圍不確定、網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)人的權(quán)利不明確、網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可合同成立后的報(bào)酬支付困難,等等。針對以上情況,筆者提出建議：網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可需要在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域和其他相關(guān)領(lǐng)域適當(dāng)引入版權(quán)默示許可規(guī)則,以充分發(fā)揮其在促進(jìn)作品快速傳播方面的重要作用,不過同時,我們也應(yīng)當(dāng)建立對作者經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的特殊保護(hù)機(jī)制,以避免在默示許可的規(guī)則下作者的利益受到損害,譬如賦予網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)人默示許可中的任意解除權(quán),確立網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)入對于報(bào)酬的異議權(quán)以及版權(quán)人的獲得報(bào)酬權(quán);并確立網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可的付費(fèi)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),引入網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可集體管理組織,最后賦予法官在司法實(shí)踐中運(yùn)用網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品版權(quán)默示許可的自由裁量權(quán)。
[Abstract]:In most cases, the establishment of an implied license for copyright in a network work is established through an explicit offer made by the user of the work, and the copyright owner subsequently makes an implied intention; in a few cases, the copyright owner makes an express "offer of authorization". But the user makes the implied promise with the actual use behavior. Copyright implied license of network works, no matter how it is established, is a kind of copyright license contract in essence. This kind of copyright license contract is different from the "involuntary license contract", such as the legal license contract, the compulsory license contract, etc. Before the establishment of the implied license contract for the copyright of a network work, the copyright owner of a network work considered whether or not to prohibit others from using it without using it, and the network copyright owner had a choice, so it was a kind of "voluntary copyright license contract". In the current era of network information, it is necessary and feasible to establish the implied license of copyright of network works, and at the same time, it is more beneficial to balance the interests of the public and copyright holders and to promote the development of cultural industry. Through the legal practice of implied license of copyright in Chinese and American Internet works, The principle of "knowing use" and "encouraging use" obtained in the implied license of search engine service in American judicial practice is worthy of the judge's case judgment in judicial practice in our country. The problems of implied license for copyright of network works in China include: the scope of application is uncertain, the rights of copyright owners of network works are not clear, the payment of remuneration after the establishment of implied license contract for copyright of network works is difficult, and so on. In view of the above situation, the author puts forward some suggestions: the implied copyright license of network works should be properly introduced into the Internet and other relevant fields in order to give full play to its important role in promoting the rapid dissemination of works. However, at the same time, we should also establish a special protection mechanism for the author's economic interests, so as to avoid the harm to the author's interests under the rules of implied license, such as granting the copyright owner the right of arbitrary rescission in the implied license of an online work. It also establishes the right to object to remuneration and the right of copyright owner to obtain remuneration, and establishes the standard of payment for implied license of copyright in network works, and introduces the collective management organization of copyright implied license of network works. Finally, the judge is given the discretion to use copyright implied license in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王秀麗;于秀麗;;授權(quán)要約:數(shù)字版權(quán)貿(mào)易的新模式[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2008年09期

2 李慧;;探討我國著作權(quán)集體管理制度[J];中國城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年08期

3 張榕;;事實(shí)認(rèn)定中的法官自由裁量權(quán)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年04期

4 趙莉;質(zhì)疑網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)中“默示許可”的法律地位[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年12期

5 呂炳斌;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代的版權(quán)默示許可制度——兩起Google案的分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年07期

6 翟中鞠;“網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代的著作權(quán)保護(hù)”國際研討會綜述[J];法商研究;2004年04期

7 梅術(shù)文;;信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)默示許可制度的不足與完善[J];法學(xué);2009年06期

8 黃彤軍;;論侵犯網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)犯罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會;2011年33期

9 朱顯榮;試析侵犯著作權(quán)的抗辯事由[J];廣東技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

10 梁健惠;;中外網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)限制制度的比較及啟示[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2009年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳偉光;數(shù)字技術(shù)環(huán)境下的版權(quán)法—危機(jī)與對策[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2008年

，

本文編號：1959337