發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-07 11:05

  本文選題：在線服務(wù) + 社會(huì)選擇理論�。� 參考：《昆明理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,隨著在線服務(wù)技術(shù)的逐漸成熟與完善,網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中上的在線服務(wù)數(shù)量急劇增多,完成相同或相似功能的在線服務(wù)也大量增加。用戶面對服務(wù)優(yōu)劣選擇時(shí),用戶不可能將每個(gè)在線服務(wù)都互相比較后再產(chǎn)生交互;還有某些不法服務(wù)提供商提供虛假的服務(wù)信息和一些惡意用戶提供了不真實(shí)的評(píng)價(jià)等,導(dǎo)致網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中的在線服務(wù)的質(zhì)量參差不齊,使得用戶難以從大量的服務(wù)中方便快捷的選擇優(yōu)質(zhì)的在線服務(wù)。另一方面,用戶在與在線服務(wù)產(chǎn)生交互的過程中,由于其消費(fèi)背景、消費(fèi)心理、消費(fèi)愛好等因素的影響,使得用戶主觀偏好不一致,即用戶對服務(wù)的評(píng)價(jià)準(zhǔn)則和尺度不一致,甚至可能出現(xiàn)矛盾和沖突。然而,傳統(tǒng)的在線服務(wù)評(píng)價(jià)方法并未考慮用戶評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一致的問題,均是同等地看待所有用戶的評(píng)價(jià),而且無法抵制惡意評(píng)價(jià)的攻擊,因此,常常給用戶帶來誤導(dǎo)性的服務(wù)選擇決策。上述問題導(dǎo)致在線服務(wù)之間無法比較或者說不具備公平的可比較性,所以迫切需要一種客觀公正的服務(wù)優(yōu)劣排序方法可有效的輔助用戶進(jìn)行在線服務(wù)的優(yōu)劣選擇決策。針對用戶評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一致和偏好不一致導(dǎo)致網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中的在線服務(wù)之間不具備公正的可比較性,從而用戶難以選擇到滿意的在線服務(wù)的問題,論文提出了基于社會(huì)選擇理論計(jì)算在線服務(wù)優(yōu)劣的排序方法。首先,根據(jù)用戶給出的用戶-服務(wù)評(píng)價(jià)矩陣構(gòu)建群體偏好矩陣;然后,基于群體偏好矩陣和Kemeny社會(huì)選擇函數(shù)構(gòu)建0-1整數(shù)規(guī)劃模型;最后,通過求解該模型可得到服務(wù)的最優(yōu)排序結(jié)果。該方法聚合個(gè)體偏好為群體偏好,決策符合群體大多數(shù)人的偏好且與個(gè)體偏好保持最大的一致性。通過理論分析和實(shí)驗(yàn)驗(yàn)證了該方法的合理性和有效性。實(shí)驗(yàn)表明,該方法能有效地解決在線服務(wù)之間的不可比較性問題,實(shí)現(xiàn)在線服務(wù)的優(yōu)劣排序,并可以有效抵制推薦攻擊,具有較強(qiáng)的抗操縱性。此外,本文還根據(jù)提出的方法和模型,設(shè)計(jì)并實(shí)現(xiàn)了在線服務(wù)優(yōu)劣評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the maturity and perfection of online service technology, the number of online services in cyberspace has increased dramatically, and the number of online services with the same or similar functions has also increased. When the user is faced with the choice of service advantages and disadvantages, it is impossible for the user to compare each online service with each other and then interact with each other; there are also some illegal service providers that provide false service information and some malicious users provide untrue evaluation, etc. As a result, the quality of online services in cyberspace is uneven, which makes it difficult for users to choose high-quality online services conveniently and quickly from a large number of services. On the other hand, in the process of interaction with online services, the subjective preferences of users are inconsistent due to the influence of their consumption background, consumer psychology, consumer preferences, and so on, that is, the criteria and scales of users' evaluation of services are not consistent. There may even be contradictions and conflicts. However, the traditional online service evaluation methods do not take into account the inconsistency of user evaluation criteria, and treat all users' evaluation equally, and can not resist the attack of malicious evaluation. Often brings to the user the misleading service choice decision. The above problems lead to the lack of comparison or fair comparability among online services, so it is urgent to use an objective and fair ranking method to assist users to make decisions on the advantages and disadvantages of online services. In view of the inconsistency of user evaluation criteria and inconsistency of preferences, there is no fair comparability between online services in cyberspace, which makes it difficult for users to choose satisfactory online services. In this paper, a ranking method is proposed to calculate the advantages and disadvantages of online services based on social selection theory. Firstly, the group preference matrix is constructed according to the user-service evaluation matrix given by the user; then, the 0-1 integer programming model is constructed based on the group preference matrix and Kemeny social selection function. By solving the model, the optimal ranking results of the service can be obtained. This method aggregates individual preferences as group preferences, and makes decisions consistent with the preferences of the majority of individuals and maintaining the greatest consistency with individual preferences. The rationality and validity of the method are verified by theoretical analysis and experiments. Experiments show that this method can effectively solve the problem of incomparability between online services, realize the ranking of the advantages and disadvantages of online services, resist recommendation attacks effectively, and have strong resistance to manipulation. In addition, according to the proposed method and model, the online service evaluation system is designed and implemented.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TP311.52

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳文明;劉茜萍;;基于可信相似用戶的服務(wù)推薦方法[J];計(jì)算機(jī)工程;2016年11期

2 吳祥標(biāo);;Kemeny社會(huì)選擇函數(shù)的0-1規(guī)劃算法[J];遵義師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

3 孫建凱;王帥強(qiáng);馬軍;;Weighted-Tau Rank:一種采用加權(quán)Kendall Tau的面向排序的協(xié)同過濾算法[J];中文信息學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

4 耿華;孟祥武;史艷翠;;一種基于信任度和鏈接預(yù)測方法的移動(dòng)用戶偏好預(yù)測方法[J];電子與信息學(xué)報(bào);2013年12期

5 魏樂;趙秋云;舒紅平;;云制造環(huán)境下基于可信評(píng)價(jià)的云服務(wù)選擇[J];計(jì)算機(jī)應(yīng)用;2013年01期

6 胡偉雄;王崇;;電子商務(wù)信任度評(píng)價(jià)方法比較研究[J];現(xiàn)代情報(bào);2012年11期

7 薛有志;郭勇峰;;C2C電子商務(wù)賣家的競爭戰(zhàn)略研究:基于淘寶網(wǎng)的分析[J];南開管理評(píng)論;2012年05期

8 樊麗杰;王素貞;劉衛(wèi);;基于人類信任機(jī)制的移動(dòng)電子商務(wù)信任評(píng)估方法[J];計(jì)算機(jī)科學(xué);2012年01期

9 粟超;;基于排序集成的自動(dòng)術(shù)語識(shí)別方法[J];計(jì)算機(jī)應(yīng)用與軟件;2012年01期

10 袁玉倩;胡曉惠;;基于QoS真實(shí)性與工作流模型的Web服務(wù)選擇[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2104770