電動(dòng)汽車聲品質(zhì)試驗(yàn)分析及研究
[Abstract]:Noise is a focal point in the research of automobile NVH. At present, most of the noise standards or criteria at home and abroad are formulated on the basis of A-weighted sound pressure level. The internal noise value of electric vehicle is much smaller than that of traditional internal combustion engine vehicle. The traditional method can not satisfy the research of electric vehicle by using the A-weight sound pressure level as the evaluation standard. Noise analysis and evaluation based on subjective evaluation of acoustic quality provides a new way to study the noise of electric vehicles. In this paper, the objective parameters of psychoacoustics and subjective evaluation tests are used to evaluate the noise sound quality of electric vehicles, and a subjective evaluation model of sound quality is established, which can guide the evaluation of sound quality to a certain extent. At the same time, it also provides an accurate and practical new idea for sound quality modeling. The main work is as follows: firstly, this paper introduces the algorithms of loudness, sharpness, roughness and volatility based on the auditory characteristics of human ears. Based on the Zwicker loudness, the above parameters are programmed with Matlab, and the accuracy of the calculation program is verified. Through the real vehicle test of electric vehicle, the noise signal which can represent the internal noise of electric vehicle under typical working conditions is obtained, the objective parameter values are calculated, and the internal noise of electric vehicle is compared and evaluated. Through the subjective evaluation test of the noise samples collected in the vehicle, the results of the evaluation are tested, and the subjective evaluation of the noise samples is obtained, and the subjective feeling is numerically valued to describe the advantages and disadvantages of the noise numerically. Finally, the multiple regression model one is established by multiple regression analysis, then the objective parameters are transformed and then the model two and model three are established. All the models have passed the significance test. The comparison shows that the third model is more accurate, which verifies the rationality and feasibility of the improved method.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號(hào)】:U469.72;U467.493
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 沈哲;左言言;宋乃華;葛瑋;;影響車輛聲品質(zhì)聽(tīng)審實(shí)驗(yàn)的相關(guān)因素研究[J];噪聲與振動(dòng)控制;2008年06期
2 鄧江華;夏洪兵;;汽車車門關(guān)閉聲聲品質(zhì)客觀評(píng)價(jià)[J];噪聲與振動(dòng)控制;2011年05期
3 藺磊;顧彥;藺玉輝;梁新華;;車輛關(guān)門聲品質(zhì)的優(yōu)化研究[J];北京汽車;2012年03期
4 楊川;于德介;;汽車關(guān)門聲品質(zhì)改進(jìn)方法的研究[J];汽車工程;2012年08期
5 申秀敏;左曙光;王勇;李彬;;轎車聲品質(zhì)主觀評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];噪聲與振動(dòng)控制;2013年01期
6 毛東興;;聲品質(zhì)研究與應(yīng)用進(jìn)展[J];聲學(xué)技術(shù);2007年01期
7 范瑋;孟子厚;;汽車車門聲品質(zhì)調(diào)查[J];聲學(xué)技術(shù);2007年04期
8 鐘秤平;陳劍;汪念平;;工業(yè)產(chǎn)品聲品質(zhì)的評(píng)價(jià)與分析方法研究[J];噪聲與振動(dòng)控制;2008年01期
9 陳劍;楊雯;李偉毅;;汽車聲品質(zhì)主觀評(píng)價(jià)試驗(yàn)方法探究[J];汽車工程;2009年04期
10 宋恩棟;陳劍;;基于某車的主客觀聲品質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)[J];噪聲與振動(dòng)控制;2009年03期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 毛東興;;聲品質(zhì)研究與應(yīng)用進(jìn)展[A];中國(guó)聲學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2005年青年學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議[CYCA'05]論文集[C];2005年
2 范瑋;孟子厚;;汽車車門的聲品質(zhì)對(duì)汽車消費(fèi)心理的影響[A];2006年聲頻工程學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)論文集[C];2006年
3 李R,
本文編號(hào):2445898
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/qiche/2445898.html