發(fā)布時間：2018-04-02 12:10

  本文選題：Altmetrics指標　切入點：新技術　出處：《情報理論與實踐》2017年06期

【摘要】：[目的/意義]通過對新技術論文的Altmetrics指標進行分析,探索新技術論文的傳播特征和規(guī)律。[方法/過程]以"基因編輯技術"相關論文為實證分析對象,通過Altmetrics,來考察其用作測度新技術傳播指標的有效性。通過在PLOS網(wǎng)站檢索"genome edit~*",下載406篇相關論文的ALMs,對論文的引用頻次(Scopus)與在線瀏覽、下載、分享與傳播數(shù)據(jù)進行正態(tài)性檢驗、相關性分析及曲線擬合,分析PLOS系列期刊論文的社會影響力和學術影響力。[結(jié)果/結(jié)論]實驗表明:指標間相關性差異較大,高度相關的兩變量組合是PLOS Total與Mendeley(r=0.829,p=0.01),Twitter與PLOS Total、Figshare、Scopus、Mendeley微弱相關,Figshare與PLOS Total、Mendeley微弱相關。期刊官網(wǎng)對論文的傳播優(yōu)勢明顯,但論文的使用與引用與Twitter的相關度都很低,顯示出Altmetrics指標在揭示新技術傳播方面存在一定的缺陷。Mendeley與PLOS Total最佳的擬合曲線為立方函數(shù)。[局限]研究的數(shù)據(jù)源為PLOS系列期刊,因此,數(shù)據(jù)的全面性方面存在一定的欠缺,結(jié)論能否推廣至其他學科,有待進一步研究補充。
[Abstract]:[objective / significance] through the analysis of the Altmetrics index of the new technology paper, to explore the transmission characteristics and law of the new technology paper. [method / process] take the "gene editing technology" related paper as the empirical analysis object, This paper investigates the validity of Altmetricsas a measure of the spread of new technologies. By searching "genome editorials *" on the PLOS website and downloading 406 related papers, the citation frequency of the papers is compared with that of online browsing, downloading, sharing and disseminating data for normality testing. Correlation analysis and curve fitting were used to analyze the social and academic influence of PLOS series of journal papers. The highly correlated combination of two variables is PLOS Total and Mendeleyn 0.829p0.01. the weak correlation between PLOS Total and PLOS Total Figshareor Scopusshare and PLOS Total Mendeley is weak. There is a significant advantage in the dissemination of papers on the official Journal website, but the correlation between the use of papers and citations and Twitter is very low. It shows that the Altmetrics index has some defects in revealing the spread of new technology. The best fitting curve between Mendeley and PLOS Total is a cubic function. [limited] the data source studied is PLOS series journals, so there is a certain deficiency in the comprehensiveness of the data. Conclusion it is necessary to further study whether it can be extended to other subjects.
【作者單位】： 南開大學圖書館;
【基金】：2016年度國家社會科學基金重點項目“網(wǎng)絡時代開放教育資源引進與利用中的知識產(chǎn)權問題研究”(項目編號:16ATQ002) 2016年度南開大學亞洲研究中心資助項目“高品質(zhì)科技期刊的Altmetrics分析”(項目編號:AS 1606) 2015年度天津市哲學社會科學規(guī)劃重點項目“MOOC背景下的圖書館應對策略研究”(項目編號:TJTQ15-001)的階段性成果
【分類號】：G206;Q78

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 劉翊鵬,鐘愛芳;我國90—92年度生物科學部分學科的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];生物學雜志;1994年02期

，

本文編號：1700326