本文選題：轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)　切入點(diǎn)：本體論　出處：《自然辯證法通訊》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：比較分析轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)與傳統(tǒng)育種技術(shù)存在的"原因"——"四因"后發(fā)現(xiàn):在質(zhì)料因上,傳統(tǒng)育種技術(shù)是"選擇"好的質(zhì)料而轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)是"制作"新的質(zhì)料;在形式因上,傳統(tǒng)育種技術(shù)是"改良"自然物種形式而轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)是"創(chuàng)造"人工物種形式;在動(dòng)力因上,在傳統(tǒng)育種技術(shù)中人力是"助推力"而在轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)中人力是"主導(dǎo)力";在目的因上,在傳統(tǒng)育種技術(shù)中內(nèi)在的目的依然剩余不少而在轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)中內(nèi)在的目的正在被人類的外在的目的所取代。由此,傳統(tǒng)育種技術(shù)培育的作物依舊保留著不少內(nèi)在的本性,而轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)培育的作物的本性主要是由人類外在的賦予的。因此,轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)與傳統(tǒng)育種技術(shù)具有本體論上的本質(zhì)性差異。
[Abstract]:By comparing and analyzing the "causes" of transgenic technology and traditional breeding technology, it is found that the traditional breeding technology is the "choice" good material and the transgenic technology is the "making" new material, and the form factor is the form factor, in the material factor, the traditional breeding technology is the "choice" good material, and the transgenic technology is the "making" new material. Traditional breeding techniques are "improved" forms of natural species, while transgenic technologies are "created" forms of artificial species; in terms of dynamics, In traditional breeding technology, human power is "booster power", while in transgenic technology, human power is "leading power". There is still a lot of inherent purpose in the traditional breeding technology, and the intrinsic purpose in the transgenic technology is being replaced by the external purpose of human being. As a result, the crops cultivated by the traditional breeding technology still retain a lot of inherent nature. The nature of crops cultivated by transgenic technology is mainly endowed by human being, therefore, there is an ontological difference between transgenic technology and traditional breeding technology.
【作者單位】： 湖州師范學(xué)院政治學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的不確定性及其治理研究”(15CZX019)
【分類號(hào)】：S188
，

本文編號(hào)：1572476