EDS分析的若干影響因素研究
[Abstract]:At present, (EDS) is widely used in microanalysis, but for the same analytical sample, different analyzers will make different analytical results, and the content of elements will vary greatly. Whether the parameters of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the energy spectrometer are reasonable or not, and whether the sample's own conditions are properly handled will directly affect the accuracy of the analytical results, so it is necessary to improve the accuracy of the quantitative analysis results and the choice of the operating parameters. The application of the technique and the treatment of the sample's own condition are worth discussing. In this paper, the factors influencing the accuracy of EDS quantitative analysis are discussed from the aspects of sample preparation, selection of working parameters of SEM and EDS, and analysis and treatment of energy spectrum. The main equipment used in this thesis is Japanese electronic JEM-6490 SEM, American EDAX-Genesis X-ray EDS.. The specific research contents are as follows: (1) the peak drift will affect the quantitative analysis results, so before the relevant experiments, the peak position correction is needed to determine the perfect fitting of the peak position. For point analysis, the analysis mode is reduced grating mode. After the peak position is obtained, the peak is automatically identified and visualized, and then calibrated manually if there is any error. For the choice of working parameters, the light element is analyzed with low acceleration voltage, the heavy element is analyzed with high acceleration voltage, the output angle of characteristic ray is changed by the size of working distance, and the dead time and counting rate are controlled by beam spot. This affects the choice of collection time. These four working parameters have an effect on the accuracy of the content, but the influence ability needs to be verified, and the orthogonal design experiment with SPSS software shows that the influence of these factors on the content is not significant. However, for each element, the influence of each parameter is still different. (2) after determining the non-significant influence of working parameters on quantitative analysis, we begin to explore the effect of sample physical condition on quantitative analysis. In order to avoid the phenomenon of charge, the content of elements in the sample should be uniformly distributed, which can be determined by software homogeneity test, which can eliminate the influence of uneven distribution of content. There is always contamination on the surface of the sample. For the local pollution, we can adjust the magnification to control the observation field to test the pollution and the matrix separately, if the whole area of carbon pollution, we only need to adjust the acceleration voltage, we can observe separately. The effect of vacuum for a long time on reducing carbon content is not obvious. For small size samples, however, when the sample size is obviously smaller than that of the sample table, and the height of the sample is small, the composition content will be affected by the sample table. The sample with inclined surface reduces the absorption distance of X-ray and increases the content of light elements. The bump and concave of the surface of the sample can obviously affect the generation and excitation of X-ray, so the surface of the sample can be ground. For the sample with cavity, when the distance between the failure region and the cavity wall is not less than the height of the cavity wall, it is not easy to be blocked by the cavity wall.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:O657.62
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馮善娥;高偉建;;掃描電鏡附EDS能譜儀的使用與維護(hù)[J];分析測試技術(shù)與儀器;2014年02期
2 劉松;;鋼中C元素EDS分析準(zhǔn)確度的影響因素[J];失效分析與預(yù)防;2014年02期
3 章小余;趙志娟;劉芬;;樣品高度對XPS測試的影響[J];分析測試技術(shù)與儀器;2013年04期
4 田弋緯;陳紹楷;苗壯;常璐;胡濤濤;;影響EDS分析準(zhǔn)確性的因素探討[J];西安文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年03期
5 葉建海;包生祥;王嬌;張德政;;提高能譜無標(biāo)樣定量分析準(zhǔn)確度的參數(shù)選擇[J];分析測試技術(shù)與儀器;2010年02期
6 王英姿;侯憲欽;;帶能譜分析的掃描電子顯微鏡在材料分析中的應(yīng)用[J];制造技術(shù)與機(jī)床;2007年09期
7 張步升;樣品表面傾角對能譜定量分析精度的影響[J];理化檢驗(yàn)(物理分冊);1997年07期
8 洪建明,,趙曉寧;能譜分析中應(yīng)注意的幾個(gè)問題[J];電子顯微學(xué)報(bào);1994年06期
9 張淑芳;冀克儉;李學(xué);張銀生;;加速電壓和樣品表面粗糙度對EDS分析精度的影響[J];電子顯微學(xué)報(bào);1993年04期
10 王典亮;洪班德;;原子序數(shù)及測試參數(shù)對塊狀樣品X射線強(qiáng)度比的影響[J];冶金分析與測試(冶金物理測試分冊);1984年05期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李世嵐;電子薄膜的電子探針能譜分析技術(shù)研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2008年
2 趙鴻飛;X射線能譜精確定量技術(shù)的研究[D];天津大學(xué);2007年
本文編號:2294204
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/huaxue/2294204.html