本文關(guān)鍵詞： 單崗遺址陶器 X射線熒光光譜 物理性能 燒成溫度 X射線衍射儀 掃描電子顯微鏡　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：河南淅川單崗遺址位于丹江流域,其優(yōu)越的地理位置也促使了當(dāng)?shù)匚幕姆笔�。單崗遺址自1994年發(fā)現(xiàn)以來,歷經(jīng)數(shù)次發(fā)掘,已取得了豐碩的成果,但目前仍未有利用現(xiàn)代分析技術(shù)對(duì)單崗遺址陶器進(jìn)行的研究。為了探究單崗遺址陶器的特點(diǎn),本文選取了屈家?guī)X和周代的一些陶器樣品,利用現(xiàn)代分析技術(shù)對(duì)這些陶器進(jìn)行研究,以探索各時(shí)期陶器之間的關(guān)系。本文利用X射線熒光光譜測(cè)量了所有所選取陶器樣品的化學(xué)組分,然后利用多元統(tǒng)計(jì)分析中的因子分析、判別分析和系統(tǒng)聚類分析對(duì)所得數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行處理,得出各時(shí)期樣品的原料來源;利用空隙儀和熱膨脹儀測(cè)量了部分樣品的物理性能和燒成溫度,以探索各時(shí)期樣品的燒制工藝差別;利用X射線衍射儀對(duì)各時(shí)期部分樣品進(jìn)行了物相分析,以確定各時(shí)期樣品的礦物組成;利用掃描電鏡觀察所選取樣品的顯微結(jié)構(gòu)得出樣品的微觀形貌。得出的結(jié)論如下:屈家?guī)X和周代各時(shí)期樣品的原料來源基本相同但相對(duì)比較分散,相對(duì)來說,西周晚期樣品的原料來源和其他時(shí)期稍有不同。說明屈家?guī)X和周代各時(shí)期當(dāng)?shù)厝司幼〉谋容^分散,但距離不是太遠(yuǎn),西周晚期時(shí)當(dāng)?shù)厝说木幼〉乜赡芘c其他時(shí)期稍有不同,但距離不遠(yuǎn)。屈家?guī)X和西周晚期樣品的吸水率和空隙率較大,春秋早、春秋中、春秋晚和戰(zhàn)國早期樣品的吸水率和空隙率較小,說明屈家?guī)X和西周晚期樣品的致密性低于其他時(shí)期。且各時(shí)期內(nèi)樣品的吸水率、空隙率、表面密度和體積密度差異較大,說明各時(shí)期內(nèi)樣品的燒制工藝也有較大差別。屈家?guī)X和周代各時(shí)期樣品的燒成溫度基本都在850℃到1050℃之間,屈家?guī)X時(shí)期到西周晚期,陶器的燒制工藝并沒有大的變化,樣品的燒成溫度都在900℃左右,燒制工藝基本相同,劣于春秋早、春秋中、春秋晚和戰(zhàn)國早期陶器的燒制工藝。屈家?guī)X和周代各時(shí)期樣品的主要礦物成分都為石英,還含有一些長石類礦物、尖晶橄欖石、鎂鋁榴石、鈣鋁榴石、鐵鋁榴石、橄欖石和硅線石等礦物,其中以長石類礦物居多。屈家?guī)X和周代各時(shí)期陶器樣品的微觀形貌非常相似,含有大量的石英顆粒,樣品中含有大量的孔洞,燒結(jié)程度較差,空隙較多,結(jié)構(gòu)比較疏松。
[Abstract]:The Dan-gang site in Xichuan, Henan Province, is located in the Danjiang River Basin, and its superior geographical location has also contributed to the prosperity of local culture. Since its discovery in 1994, the site has been excavated several times and has achieved fruitful results. In order to explore the characteristics of the pottery, this paper selects some pottery samples from Qujialing and Zhou dynasties. Modern analytical techniques are used to study these pottery in order to explore the relationship between them. In this paper, the chemical components of all selected pottery samples have been measured by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Then the data are processed by factor analysis, discriminant analysis and systematic cluster analysis, and the source of raw materials is obtained. The physical properties and sintering temperature of some samples were measured by means of voidometer and thermal expansion instrument to explore the difference of sintering process in each period, and the phase analysis of some samples was carried out by means of X-ray diffractometer. To determine the mineral composition of the samples during each period; The microstructure of the selected samples was obtained by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The conclusions are as follows: the raw materials of the samples in Qujialing and Zhou dynasties were basically the same but relatively dispersed. The source of raw materials in the late Western Zhou Dynasty is slightly different from that in other periods. It shows that the local people lived in different periods in Qujialing and Zhou dynasties, but the distance is not too far. The local people's residence in the late Western Zhou Dynasty may be slightly different from that in other periods. However, the distance is not far. The water absorption and void rate of the samples in Qujialing and the late Western Zhou period are relatively large, and the water absorption and void rates of the samples in the early spring and autumn, in the middle of the spring and autumn, in the late spring and autumn and in the early warring States period are relatively small. The results showed that the densification of the samples in Qujialing and the late Western Zhou period was lower than that in other periods, and the water absorption, porosity, surface density and volume density of the samples varied greatly in each period. The sintering temperature of samples in Qujialing period and Zhou Dynasty was basically between 850 鈩，

本文編號(hào)：1520070