【摘要】：隨著時(shí)間、技術(shù)的不斷發(fā)展,機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)的作用越來(lái)越顯著,且機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)的不斷更新?lián)Q代使得其復(fù)雜程度也大大提高。機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)在運(yùn)行過(guò)程中不可避免的會(huì)出現(xiàn)故障,為了提高機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)的可靠性和安全性,很有必要對(duì)機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)的故障進(jìn)行分析、診斷。本文針對(duì)機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng),采用了故障影響模式及危害性分析(Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis,簡(jiǎn)稱FMECA)和故障樹(Fault Tree Analysis,簡(jiǎn)稱FTA)分析方法,并結(jié)合Matlab/Simulink仿真平臺(tái),對(duì)機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行了故障分析,主要工作內(nèi)容和結(jié)論如下:(1)對(duì)機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)原理進(jìn)行分析,確定系統(tǒng)關(guān)鍵部件及其之間的故障邏輯關(guān)系。按照國(guó)家軍用標(biāo)準(zhǔn),收集了相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù);針對(duì)換熱器、水分離器、活門、傳感器、渦輪等制冷系統(tǒng)主要部件進(jìn)行FMECA分析,制成FMECA表格。(2)在FMECA的基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用FTA方法,建立了各部件和以座艙溫度異常、座艙壓力異常為頂事件的故障樹模型,并對(duì)其進(jìn)行故障樹分析,得到了故障排序。分析結(jié)果表明,渦輪部件故障是導(dǎo)致座艙溫度高于舒適區(qū)溫度的主要原因,座艙溫度低于舒適區(qū)溫度歸因于調(diào)節(jié)活門故障,而壓力傳感器故障導(dǎo)致了座艙壓力異常。(3)搭建了機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)的仿真模型,并進(jìn)行了故障仿真。根據(jù)座艙通風(fēng)溫度結(jié)合嚴(yán)酷度等級(jí),利用部件效率對(duì)系統(tǒng)故障進(jìn)行定義,為故障仿真提供了故障判據(jù)。對(duì)不同工況下的機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行仿真計(jì)算,得到單一故障時(shí)系統(tǒng)各部件出口參數(shù)的數(shù)據(jù),進(jìn)而建立了機(jī)載制冷系統(tǒng)的故障數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)。通過(guò)對(duì)各部件出口參數(shù)的監(jiān)測(cè)與對(duì)比,可以快速找到故障原因和故障模式的排序,這說(shuō)明以座艙通風(fēng)溫度作為故障判據(jù),利用部件效率來(lái)量化不同嚴(yán)酷度下的故障具有可行性。
[Abstract]:With the development of technology and time, the function of airborne refrigeration system is becoming more and more important, and the complexity of airborne refrigeration system is greatly improved. In order to improve the reliability and safety of airborne refrigeration system, it is necessary to analyze and diagnose the fault of airborne refrigeration system. In this paper, the fault analysis method of airborne refrigeration system based on failure Mode effects and criticality Analysis (FMECA) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is adopted, and the fault analysis of airborne refrigeration system is carried out based on Matlab / Simulink simulation platform. The main contents and conclusions are as follows: (1) the principle of airborne refrigeration system is analyzed to determine the key components of the system and its fault logic relationship. According to the national military standard, the relevant data are collected, and FMECA tables are made for the main parts of refrigeration system, such as heat exchanger, water separator, valve, sensor, turbine and so on. (2) based on FMECA, FTA method is used. The fault tree model of each component and the cabin temperature anomaly and cabin pressure anomaly as the top event is established, and the fault tree analysis is carried out, and the fault ranking is obtained. The analysis results show that turbine component failure is the main cause of cabin temperature higher than comfort zone temperature, and cabin temperature lower than comfort zone temperature is attributed to adjustment valve failure. The fault of pressure sensor leads to abnormal cabin pressure. (3) the simulation model of airborne refrigeration system is built and the fault simulation is carried out. According to cabin ventilation temperature and severity grade, the system fault is defined by component efficiency, which provides fault criterion for fault simulation. The data of the exit parameters of each component of the airborne refrigeration system under different working conditions are obtained by simulation and calculation, and the fault database of the airborne refrigeration system is established. By monitoring and comparing the exit parameters of each component, the fault causes and fault modes can be quickly found, which shows that it is feasible to use the cabin ventilation temperature as the fault criterion and use the component efficiency to quantify the faults with different severity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京航空航天大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：V267

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何杰;朱磊;趙競(jìng)?cè)?;飛機(jī)換熱器故障診斷仿真研究[J];計(jì)算機(jī)仿真;2012年07期

2 米金華;李彥鋒;李海慶;黃洪鐘;;基于模糊理論的數(shù)控機(jī)床液壓系統(tǒng)故障樹分析[J];制造技術(shù)與機(jī)床;2011年04期

3 周忠寶;馬超群;周經(jīng)倫;董豆豆;;基于動(dòng)態(tài)貝葉斯網(wǎng)絡(luò)的動(dòng)態(tài)故障樹分析[J];系統(tǒng)工程理論與實(shí)踐;2008年02期

4 O@慶民;許開立;;灰色層次結(jié)構(gòu)模型在故障樹分析中的應(yīng)用[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2007年09期

5 胡璽良;張代勝;劉煥廣;;探析基于壽命成本的FMEA[J];現(xiàn)代機(jī)械;2007年01期

6 趙廷弟,楊為民;智能故障模式影響分析的推理研究[J];航空學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

7 鞠魯粵;模糊致命度分析及其在矩陣FMECA中的應(yīng)用[J];上海大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);1999年05期

8 徐凱,朱梅林;失效模式及影響分析中的模糊推理方法[J];華中理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1999年09期

9 任榮權(quán),于博生,趙眾,黃民;失效嚴(yán)重度模糊綜合評(píng)判[J];石油學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

10 歐陽(yáng)驊,任兆生;軍用飛機(jī)座艙溫度控制的生理學(xué)要求[J];中華航空醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;1995年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2133867