A large wave of railway reform started since 1980s and still on-going.A number of countries chose different types of reform models based on their specific conditions and objectives.Studies on the railway reform experience,particularly the efficiency impact is substantial.However,currently debate on the appropriate reform model choice among researchers are intense and not conclusive.This study attempted to shed light on the background and pre-conditions of these reforms through quantitative analy... 

【文章來源】：北京交通大學(xué)北京市 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：256 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgement
Abstract
1 Introduction
    1.1 Background
        1.1.1 Railway Reform Arguments from International Perspective
        1.1.2 Railway Reform Arguments in China
        1.1.3 Railway Industry Efficiency and Debt Problems in China
    1.2 Research Question
    1.3 Research Contents and Logic Framework
    1.4 Concepts Definition
2 Railway Reform and Performance History and Status Quo
    2.1 Main Alternatives of Railway Reform
    2.2 Railway Reform and Performance: Ownership
        2.2.1 Public Ownership
        2.2.2 Private Ownership
        2.2.3 Mixed Ownership
        2.2.4 Vertical Separation
        2.2.5 Horizontal Separation
        2.2.6 Railway Reform and Performance: Integration Mode
        2.2.7 Railway Reform and Performance: Mixed mode
    2.3 Railway Reform and Performance: Competition
        2.3.1 Competition in the Rail Market
        2.3.2 Competition for Rail Market
    2.4 Summary
3 Literature and Methodology Review
    3.1 Theory
        3.1.1 Governance Theory
        3.1.2 Modes of Governance
        3.1.3 Workable Competition
        3.1.4 Characteristics of Railway
    3.2 Methodology Review
        3.2.1 Qualitative Methodology
        3.2.2 Quantitative Methodology
    3.3 Summary
4 Research Framework and Method Design
    4.1 Research Framework
        4.1.1 Research Focus
        4.1.2 Selection of Research Methodology
    4.2 Method Design
        4.2.1 Data Collection Methods
        4.2.2. Questionnaire Design
    4.3 Econometric Modelling
        4.3.1 Structural Equation Model
        4.3.2 Model Construction Steps
5 Questionnaire Analysis and Modelling Research Results
    5.1 Questionnaire Descriptive Analysis
    5.2 Reliability and Validity Analysis
    5.3 Modelling Research Results
    5.4 Summary
6 Case Comparison of Railway Reform Modes Worldwide
    6.1 Australian Model
        6.1.1 Overview of Australian Railway
        6.1.2 Railway Reform
    6.2 UK Model
        6.2.1 Overview of British Railway Industry
        6.2.2 British Railway Reform
    6.3 The US model
        6.3.1 Overview of the Railway Industry of the United States
        6.3.2 Railway Reform
    6.4 EU model
        6.4.1 Overview of EU Railway Industry
        6.4.2 Railway Reform
    6.5 Japanese model
        6.5.1 Overview of the Japanese Railway Industry
        6.5.2 Railway Reform in Japan
    6.6 Russian Railway Industry Reform
        6.6.1 Overview of Russian Railway Industry
        6.6.2 Railway Companies:
        6.6.3 Regulatory Authorities
        6.6.4 Railway Reform
    6.7 Summary
7 Conclusions, Implication and Limitation
    7.1 Conclusion
    7.2 Implications
    7.3 Limitations
Reference
Appendix A-Respondents' Information
Appendix B-Questionnaire
Appendix C-DIRECTIVE 2001/14/EC of EU Parliament
Appendix D-Principal infrastructure managers of Australian railways
Appendix E- Decree N 811 of 12.20.2004 of the Russian Government
Appendix F- Federal Law of January 10, 2003 No. 17-03
學(xué)位論文數(shù)據(jù)集


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]國家治理、政府治理和社會治理的基本含義及其相互關(guān)系辨析[J]. 王浦劬.  社會學(xué)評論. 2014(03)



本文編號：3316581