【摘要】：在工程供應(yīng)鏈中,工程承包商為業(yè)主供應(yīng)工程建設(shè)所需的技術(shù)、原材料、設(shè)備、人力等戰(zhàn)略資源,即承包商為業(yè)主的工程建設(shè)能力供應(yīng)商。在交通工程中,它們之間對(duì)立的關(guān)系是工程失敗的主要原因。一直以來(lái),正式合同是工程供應(yīng)鏈成員之間關(guān)系治理的焦點(diǎn),但實(shí)際上,由于合同具有敵對(duì)性和不完整性,所以關(guān)系治理機(jī)制越來(lái)越受到關(guān)注。本文首先基于社會(huì)資本理論和社會(huì)交換理論,將社會(huì)資本(例如,事前關(guān)系、共同準(zhǔn)則和信任)定義為事前關(guān)系治理機(jī)制,將業(yè)主與承包商之間的協(xié)作(例如,信息交流、共同行為)定義為事后關(guān)系治理機(jī)制,從而考察它們?cè)诓煌A段對(duì)工程績(jī)效的影響。其次,盡管治理機(jī)制的選擇取決于業(yè)主和承包商測(cè)量項(xiàng)目團(tuán)隊(duì)行為和績(jī)效的能力以及資源分配的能力,但是治理機(jī)制對(duì)工程控制能力的影響以及它們間的交互作用仍然未知。本文借鑒控制理論,將"工程控制能力"定義為一個(gè)新的結(jié)構(gòu),并推斷"工程控制能力"不僅受到治理機(jī)制的運(yùn)用的影響,而且它在治理機(jī)制與工程績(jī)效的動(dòng)態(tài)關(guān)系中充當(dāng)著中介的角色。最后,本文通過(guò)交通工程過(guò)程的劃分,重點(diǎn)研究在合同簽署后的前期階段和合同簽署后的穩(wěn)定階段,治理機(jī)制、工程控制能力與工程績(jī)效間的動(dòng)態(tài)關(guān)系。本研究主要針對(duì)中國(guó)交通工程的業(yè)主和承包商設(shè)計(jì)和發(fā)放了問(wèn)卷,最終回收了 288份有效問(wèn)卷。然后運(yùn)用最小偏二乘法結(jié)構(gòu)方程建模處理和分析了數(shù)據(jù),檢測(cè)了研究假設(shè)、驗(yàn)證了研究模型。結(jié)果表明,在兩個(gè)階段,關(guān)系治理機(jī)制和正式合同相互促進(jìn);社會(huì)資本和正式合同都通過(guò)協(xié)作的中介作用對(duì)工程控制能力具有正面影響,在合同簽署后的前期階段,社會(huì)資本對(duì)工程績(jī)效具有直接的正面促進(jìn)作用,合同通過(guò)協(xié)作的中介作用對(duì)工程績(jī)效具有間接的正面促進(jìn)作用;在合同簽署后的穩(wěn)定階段,協(xié)作通過(guò)工程控制能力的中介作用對(duì)工程績(jī)效具有正面影響,正式合同對(duì)工程績(jī)效無(wú)直接或間接的影響。
[Abstract]:In the engineering supply chain, the contractor supplies the technical, raw materials, equipment, manpower and other strategic resources needed for the construction of the project to the owner, that is, the contractor is the supplier of the engineering construction ability of the owner. In traffic engineering, the relationship between them is the main reason for the failure of the project. Formal contract has always been the focus of relationship governance among the members of engineering supply chain, but in fact, because of the hostility and incompleteness of contract, the mechanism of relationship governance has been paid more and more attention. Based on the theory of social capital and the theory of social exchange, this paper defines social capital (for example, prior relationship, common criterion and trust) as the governance mechanism of prior relationship, and defines the cooperation between owner and contractor (for example, information exchange). Common behavior) is defined as the ex post-relationship governance mechanism to examine their impact on engineering performance at different stages. Secondly, although the choice of governance mechanism depends on the ability of the employer and contractor to measure the behavior and performance of the project team and the ability to allocate resources, the impact of the governance mechanism on the engineering control ability and their interaction is still unknown. Based on the theory of control, this paper defines "engineering control ability" as a new structure, and concludes that "engineering control ability" is not only affected by the application of governance mechanism. Moreover, it acts as an intermediary in the dynamic relationship between governance mechanism and engineering performance. Finally, through the division of the traffic engineering process, this paper focuses on the dynamic relationship between the early stage after the contract signing and the stable stage after the contract signing, the governance mechanism, the engineering control ability and the engineering performance. In this study, a questionnaire was designed and distributed to the owners and contractors of Chinese traffic engineering, and 288 valid questionnaires were collected. Then the minimum partial multiplication structure equation is used to model and analyze the data, the research hypothesis is tested, and the research model is verified. The results show that, in the two stages, the relationship governance mechanism and the formal contract promote each other, the social capital and the formal contract have a positive impact on the engineering control ability through the intermediary function of collaboration, and in the early stage after the contract is signed, Social capital has a direct positive effect on project performance, while contract plays an indirect positive role in project performance through the intermediary role of cooperation; in the stable stage after the signing of the contract, the social capital plays an indirect and positive role in the project performance. Collaboration has a positive effect on engineering performance through the intermediary of engineering control ability, while formal contract has no direct or indirect effect on project performance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：U415.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 云虹,胡明珠;供應(yīng)鏈中的關(guān)系治理模式比較研究[J];物流技術(shù);2004年11期

2 謝洪濤;陳帆;;契約治理與關(guān)系治理對(duì)建設(shè)項(xiàng)目績(jī)效的影響研究[J];項(xiàng)目管理技術(shù);2013年10期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué) 楊慧 蔡文著;創(chuàng)新龍頭企業(yè)與農(nóng)戶關(guān)系治理機(jī)制[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

2 朱沆 何軒;家族企業(yè)：關(guān)系治理or契約治理？[N];民營(yíng)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 陳旭;企業(yè)間合作關(guān)系治理的理論研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

2 張群洪;組織際信息系統(tǒng)對(duì)關(guān)系治理及其績(jī)效影響的實(shí)證研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年

3 王穎;渠道關(guān)系治理研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

4 李進(jìn)中;基于控制權(quán)視角的家族大股東三重委托代理關(guān)系研究[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 蔣堅(jiān);制度距離與國(guó)內(nèi)跨區(qū)域聯(lián)盟治理機(jī)制的關(guān)系研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

2 伍紫瑩;互動(dòng)導(dǎo)向、關(guān)系學(xué)習(xí)與知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移績(jī)效的關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2016年

3 沈?qū)庍h(yuǎn);家族超額控制與股價(jià)暴跌風(fēng)險(xiǎn)相關(guān)關(guān)系研究[D];浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2017年

4 田濱帆;關(guān)系治理對(duì)PPP項(xiàng)目管理績(jī)效影響的研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2017年

5 白佳;交通工程中業(yè)主與承包商關(guān)系的動(dòng)態(tài)治理研究[D];南京大學(xué);2015年

6 趙超超;關(guān)系治理對(duì)建設(shè)項(xiàng)目管理績(jī)效影響的實(shí)證分析[D];天津理工大學(xué);2014年

7 劉麗;環(huán)境不確定性、關(guān)系治理與企業(yè)績(jī)效關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[D];新疆財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

8 姜翰;企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略模式對(duì)企業(yè)關(guān)系實(shí)踐影響的實(shí)證研究[D];清華大學(xué);2009年

9 鄂瑩晨;企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)網(wǎng)絡(luò)關(guān)系治理研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2201464