本文選題：黃土隧道 + 監(jiān)測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)�。� 參考：《蘭州交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年因?yàn)閬韲?guó)家各類方針政策的施行,西部各省份交通運(yùn)輸行業(yè)得到迅速發(fā)展,越來越多的公路、鐵路將穿越黃土區(qū)域。我國(guó)黃土隧道設(shè)計(jì)和施工并沒有系統(tǒng)的理論體系,大多數(shù)都是以工程類比法為主。本文以塘家塬黃土隧道為依托,主要采用現(xiàn)場(chǎng)監(jiān)測(cè)量控、圍巖壓力理論計(jì)算及數(shù)值模擬計(jì)算三種方法相結(jié)合的手段,研究黃土隧道圍巖變化規(guī)律和應(yīng)力分布規(guī)律,為以后的黃土隧道工程進(jìn)行指導(dǎo)和借鑒。主要研究?jī)?nèi)容如下:⑴.介紹了黃土隧道的四種施工工法,分別為:中隔壁開挖法(CD法)、雙側(cè)壁導(dǎo)坑法、交叉中隔壁法(CRD法)及三臺(tái)階法。對(duì)比分析四種工法,評(píng)價(jià)其優(yōu)劣性。⑵.根據(jù)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)實(shí)測(cè)數(shù)據(jù)得出:黃土隧道圍巖變形一般經(jīng)歷三個(gè)階段“急劇變化—緩慢變化—基本穩(wěn)定”。仰拱封閉以前變形量約占總變形量90%以上,所以基本穩(wěn)定階段一般發(fā)生在仰拱施作完成后。根據(jù)《公路隧道施工技術(shù)規(guī)范》規(guī)定得出:二次襯砌施作的最佳時(shí)間為隧道開挖后的第18天。⑶.采用現(xiàn)有的六種圍巖壓力計(jì)算方法和七種隧道深淺埋判斷法計(jì)算得出,泰沙基理論計(jì)算結(jié)果和實(shí)測(cè)結(jié)果能很好的吻合,推薦使用泰沙基理論為塘家塬大斷面黃土隧道的圍巖計(jì)算理論,建議采用47m為塘家塬黃土隧道的深淺埋分界標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。⑷.通過數(shù)值模擬研究在同樣的支護(hù)設(shè)計(jì)參數(shù)下,中隔壁開挖法(CD法),雙側(cè)壁導(dǎo)坑法及三臺(tái)階法的圍巖變形規(guī)律、應(yīng)力分布規(guī)律及塑性區(qū)分布規(guī)律,得出結(jié)論如下:雙側(cè)壁導(dǎo)坑法對(duì)于大斷面黃土隧道的開挖穩(wěn)定性以及安全性有較好的保障,能夠更有效地控制圍巖變形,建議在圍巖較差段采用雙側(cè)壁導(dǎo)坑法。
[Abstract]:In recent years, due to the implementation of various national policies, the transportation industry in the western provinces has developed rapidly, and more and more roads and railways will pass through the loess region. There is no systematic theoretical system in the design and construction of loess tunnel in China, most of which are based on engineering analogy. Based on the Tangjiayuan Loess Tunnel, this paper studies the variation law and stress distribution law of the surrounding rock of the loess tunnel by means of the combination of three methods: field monitoring and control, theoretical calculation of surrounding rock pressure and numerical simulation calculation. For the future loess tunnel engineering guidance and reference. The main research contents are as follows: 1. This paper introduces four construction methods of loess tunnel, which are: middle next door excavation method, double side wall guide pit method, cross middle next door method and CRD method, and three stage method. Compare and analyze the four methods and evaluate their merits and demerits. 2. According to the field measured data, it is concluded that the deformation of surrounding rock in loess tunnel generally goes through three stages: rapid change, slow change and basic stability. The deformation amount of the inverted arch is about 90% of the total deformation before closure, so the basic stable stage usually occurs after the completion of the inverted arch construction. According to "Technical Specification for Highway Tunnel Construction", it is concluded that the best time for secondary lining construction is the 18th day after tunnel excavation. By using the existing six kinds of surrounding rock pressure calculation methods and seven tunnel depth and shallow burying judgment methods, it is concluded that the calculated results of Teshaji theory are in good agreement with the measured results. It is recommended to use the theory of Taishaji as the calculation theory of surrounding rock of large section loess tunnel in Tangjiayuan, and to adopt 47m as the standard of deep and shallow buried boundary of Tangjiayuan loess tunnel. Under the same supporting design parameters, the deformation law, stress distribution law and plastic zone distribution law of surrounding rock in the middle adjacent excavation method, double side wall guide pit method and three step method are studied by numerical simulation. The conclusion is as follows: the method of double-side wall guide pit has a good guarantee for the stability and safety of large section loess tunnel excavation and can control the deformation of surrounding rock more effectively. It is suggested that the double-side wall tunnel method should be used in the poor section of surrounding rock.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：U456.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐恕;傅鶴林;;Ⅴ級(jí)圍巖大斷面公路隧道壓力拱影響因素分析[J];中外公路;2017年01期

2 吳飛潔;邵生俊;佘芳濤;;黃土隧道圍巖壓力的一種極限平衡理論計(jì)算方法研究[J];西安理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

3 楊建民;;大斷面黃土隧道施工方法分析[J];鐵道工程學(xué)報(bào);2015年10期

4 陳建勛;楊海峰;夏鵬;;大跨度黃土隧道洞口淺埋段支護(hù)效果監(jiān)測(cè)及分析[J];公路隧道;2013年04期

5 李創(chuàng)軍;柯以茂;;大斷面黃土隧道弧形導(dǎo)坑三臺(tái)階七步開挖施工技術(shù)研究[J];公路交通科技(應(yīng)用技術(shù)版);2013年11期

6 程選生;王建華;;基于圍巖位移控制的超大斷面黃土隧道施工方法研究[J];巖土工程學(xué)報(bào);2013年S1期

7 李良輝;;徠卡TS06全站儀放樣方法及精度分析[J];酒鋼科技;2013年02期

8 任建喜;黨超;;馬鞍子梁軟巖隧道圍巖變形規(guī)律及支護(hù)技術(shù)模擬分析[J];施工技術(shù);2012年01期

9 李健;譚忠盛;喻渝;倪魯肅;;下穿高速公路淺埋大跨度黃土隧道施工措施研究[J];巖土力學(xué);2011年09期

10 曲星;李寧;;松散巖體豎向壓力計(jì)算方法剖析及隧洞深淺埋劃分方法研究[J];巖石力學(xué)與工程學(xué)報(bào);2011年S1期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 劉蕊;淺埋偏壓黃土隧道施工變形控制研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2015年

2 王永輝;小壩田隧道支護(hù)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化及二次襯砌施作時(shí)機(jī)研究[D];蘭州交通大學(xué);2014年

3 司皓同;淺埋大跨徑黃土公路隧道施工數(shù)值模擬[D];長(zhǎng)安大學(xué);2013年

4 黨超;馬鞍子梁隧道圍巖變形規(guī)律及初期支護(hù)結(jié)構(gòu)安全性研究[D];西安科技大學(xué);2012年

5 倫培元;黃土地區(qū)大斷面淺埋暗挖隧道施工監(jiān)測(cè)與穩(wěn)定性分析[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2012年

6 孫兟;淺埋偏壓超大斷面地鐵車站工法選擇研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2012年

7 伍冬;山嶺隧道圍巖壓力計(jì)算方法及其適用性研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2012年

8 王成橋;金槍巖隧道監(jiān)控量測(cè)與穩(wěn)定性研究[D];西華大學(xué);2011年

9 王華川;超大斷面黃土隧道雙側(cè)壁導(dǎo)坑法施工過程受力分析[D];華南理工大學(xué);2009年

10 何山;淺埋大跨度偏壓隧道動(dòng)態(tài)施工數(shù)值模擬和施工工序比選研究[D];中南大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1842055