本文選題：交通狀態(tài)評價 + 數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析　； 參考：《江西理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,道路上車的種類和數(shù)量也愈來愈多,交通擁擠現(xiàn)象也越來越嚴(yán)重。對道路上交通狀態(tài)進(jìn)行評價,得到道路的交通狀態(tài)信息,提供給交通參與者和交通管理者,對緩解交通擁擠,維護(hù)交通的穩(wěn)定是有著非常重要的意義。因此為了更好地評價城市道路的交通狀態(tài),從以下幾個內(nèi)容進(jìn)行研究:第一章介紹國內(nèi)外的交通擁擠狀況,全文的技術(shù)路線和結(jié)構(gòu)安排。第二章先對組合方法優(yōu)勢的說明,并指出組合是對評價方法和評價方法中確定權(quán)重方法的組合。再介紹幾種常用于判斷交通擁擠程度的交通流參數(shù),給出本文是著重于對路段和交叉口上的交通狀態(tài)進(jìn)行評價分析。第三章是幾種常用于評價城市道路交通狀態(tài)的評價方法(如數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析,云模型,TOPSIS方法,模糊綜合評價)進(jìn)行研究。針對案例的分析,引出第四章對組合評價方法中幾種常用的確定評價指標(biāo)影響權(quán)重方法(如主成分分析方法,熵權(quán)法,層次分析方法)的研究。第五章是對TOPSIS法,模糊綜合評價方法和確定權(quán)重的幾種方法的組合進(jìn)行應(yīng)用研究,最后確定出模糊綜合評價方法結(jié)合層次分析確定權(quán)重的方法對要評價的區(qū)域進(jìn)行研究。實(shí)例驗(yàn)證結(jié)果表明,交叉口對交通狀態(tài)的評價占據(jù)比較大的權(quán)重。同時,層次分析方法中四種計(jì)算方法取平均值求得的權(quán)重值比四種計(jì)算方法單獨(dú)計(jì)算取得的權(quán)重值更加合理科學(xué)。實(shí)例驗(yàn)證了方法的合理性和實(shí)用性。第六章是對各種方法的優(yōu)勢與不適用本文評價對象的原因的總結(jié),并且對下一步的研究工作進(jìn)行展望。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy, there are more and more kinds and quantity of vehicles on the road, and traffic congestion is becoming more and more serious.It is very important to evaluate the traffic state on the road and obtain the traffic state information to provide traffic participants and traffic managers to alleviate the traffic congestion and maintain the traffic stability.Therefore, in order to evaluate the traffic state of urban roads better, the following contents are studied: the first chapter introduces the traffic congestion situation at home and abroad, the technical route and the structure arrangement of the full text.In the second chapter, the advantages of the combination method are explained, and it is pointed out that the combination is the combination of the evaluation method and the method of determining the weight of the evaluation method.Several kinds of traffic flow parameters which are often used to judge the degree of traffic congestion are introduced. The emphasis of this paper is on the evaluation and analysis of traffic conditions on road sections and intersections.In the third chapter, several evaluation methods (such as data envelopment analysis, cloud model TOPSIS method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation) which are often used to evaluate urban road traffic condition are studied.According to the analysis of cases, the fourth chapter studies several commonly used methods of determining the influence weight of evaluation index (such as principal component analysis, entropy weight and analytic hierarchy process).In the fifth chapter, the combination of TOPSIS method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and several methods to determine the weight are studied. Finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method combined with the AHP method to determine the weight of the region to be evaluated is studied.The result shows that the evaluation of the traffic state at the intersection occupies a large weight.At the same time, it is more reasonable and scientific for the four calculation methods of AHP to get the weight value by taking the average value than the weight value obtained by the four calculation methods alone.The rationality and practicability of the method are verified by an example.The sixth chapter summarizes the advantages of various methods and the reasons why they are not suitable for this paper, and looks forward to the next research work.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：U491

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃崇偉;謝素華;凌建明;;基于數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析的交通科技項(xiàng)目投入產(chǎn)出科技效率評價[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2008年06期

2 朱泰英,雋志才,楊印生,姚宏偉;DEA方法在電子收費(fèi)系統(tǒng)綜合評價中的應(yīng)用[J];公路交通科技;2003年06期

3 杜進(jìn)有;楊遠(yuǎn)祥;李宗平;;城市道路網(wǎng)飽和度模型及其應(yīng)用[J];公路交通科技;2006年03期

4 楊兆升,季常煦,楊楠;公路網(wǎng)規(guī)劃方案技術(shù)水平評價方法的研究[J];公路交通科技;1997年04期

5 楊祖元;徐姣;羅兵;杜長海;;基于SFLA-FCM聚類的城市交通狀態(tài)判別研究[J];計(jì)算機(jī)應(yīng)用研究;2010年05期

6 蔣金亮;宋瑞;李晉;劉杰;;基于DEA的城市道路交通擁堵評價[J];交通信息與安全;2011年03期

7 金菊良,魏一鳴,丁晶;基于改進(jìn)層次分析法的模糊綜合評價模型[J];水利學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

8 羅軍剛;解建倉;阮本清;;基于熵權(quán)的水資源短缺風(fēng)險(xiǎn)模糊綜合評價模型及應(yīng)用[J];水利學(xué)報(bào);2008年09期

9 鄧雪;李家銘;曾浩健;陳俊羊;趙俊峰;;層次分析法權(quán)重計(jì)算方法分析及其應(yīng)用研究[J];數(shù)學(xué)的實(shí)踐與認(rèn)識;2012年07期

10 劉志鋼;吳強(qiáng);何靜;郁思加;;基于DEA方法的城市軌道交通綜合效率研究[J];鐵道運(yùn)輸與經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 孫超;城市道路交通狀態(tài)評價分析研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2010年

2 晏承玲;基于模糊理論的城市道路交通狀態(tài)判別研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2013年

3 萬佳;基于云模型的路網(wǎng)交通擁堵狀態(tài)判別算法研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1768780