【摘要】：體育思想是人們對體育本質(zhì)及其規(guī)律的認識，是一定歷史條件下社會、政治、經(jīng)濟、教育的產(chǎn)物。美國佛蒙特大學(xué)哈維蘭教授在1984年版的《當代人類學(xué)》中稱：“思想不是可見的行為，而是人們用以解釋經(jīng)驗和導(dǎo)致行為并為行為所反映的價值觀和信仰�！睎|西方體育思想的形成與發(fā)展，既有相似的社會背景，也有不同的表現(xiàn)形態(tài)。將東方圣人孔子與西方科學(xué)先驅(qū)亞里士多德的體育思想進行跨時空比較，不僅可以了解中西方體育思想的歷史，也是體育發(fā)展的客觀需要。雖然不同的政治、經(jīng)濟、文化背景所形成的體育思想存在諸多差別，但其中必然也包含諸多共性的內(nèi)容。此外，只有通過比較，方可尋找體育思想的發(fā)展規(guī)律，然后相互借鑒、取長補短，進而在孔子與亞里士多德體育思想比較研究中獲取有利于我國體育發(fā)展的啟示。 體育思想的逐步發(fā)展與完善是其自身必然的選擇，而完成這種選擇較為重要舉措之一就是對著名人物的體育思想進行研究，所以對孔子與亞里士多德體育思想進行比較研究的主要任務(wù)，就是從那些大量的零星、分散、無序的經(jīng)驗知識及理論知識中歸納出體育思想在圣人思想中的發(fā)展邏輯，進而建構(gòu)完整的體育思想理論體系，為最后的“解釋和超越直接的體育思想經(jīng)驗”提供一種恰當?shù)睦砟睢Ｒ虼�，作者從時代與環(huán)境、對象與內(nèi)容、方法與理念和目的與目標四個方面對孔子與亞里士多德體育思想進行比較研究。認為“道德禮樂仁”是孔子體育思想的核心理念，而“科學(xué)實證理”則是亞里士多德體育思想的理論基礎(chǔ)。他們兩人的體育思想各有不同的側(cè)重點，針對當代體育思想的發(fā)展認識，認為“和諧創(chuàng)造論”是融合他們二人體育思想的關(guān)鍵。借助“和諧創(chuàng)造論”進行融合后，，對當代體育思想大有裨益，主要表現(xiàn)在以下四個方面：有利于豐富體育思想內(nèi)容；有利于促進體育思想交流；有利于推動體育思想發(fā)展；有利于建構(gòu)體育思想體系。 通過對孔子與亞里士多德體育思想研究后發(fā)現(xiàn)，對兩種具有代表性文化的體育思想進行比較與交流，不僅是一次道德與理性的碰撞，也是一次人文與科學(xué)的融合。立足于當代體育思想的發(fā)展，根據(jù)孔子與亞里士多德體育思想對當代的啟示，提出四點建議：首先，是要凸顯體育教育作用及價值；然后，要重視體育基礎(chǔ)學(xué)科的發(fā)展；其次，是注重體育道德觀念的培養(yǎng)；最后，是培養(yǎng)終身體育鍛煉的習(xí)慣。而四點建議的由來是孔子與亞里士多德體育思想融合后一以貫之的結(jié)果！
[Abstract]:Sports thought is people's understanding of the essence and law of sports, and is the product of society, politics, economy and education under certain historical conditions. In the 1984 edition of Contemporary Anthropology, Professor Havilland of the University of Vermont said: "ideas are not visible acts, but values and beliefs that people use to explain experience and lead to behavior and to be reflected in it." The formation and development of Eastern and Western sports thoughts have not only similar social background, but also different forms of expression. Comparing the sports thoughts of Confucius, the eastern sage and Aristotle, the scientific pioneer of the West, can not only understand the history of Chinese and Western sports thoughts, but also be the objective need for the development of sports. Although there are many differences in sports thoughts formed by different political, economic and cultural backgrounds, they must also contain many common contents. In addition, only through the comparison, can we find the development law of sports thought, then draw lessons from each other, learn from each other, and obtain the enlightenment which is beneficial to the development of sports in our country in the comparative study of Confucius' and Aristotle's sports thoughts. The gradual development and perfection of sports thought is its own inevitable choice, and one of the more important measures to complete this choice is to study the sports thought of famous people. Therefore, the main task of the comparative study of Confucius and Aristotle's sports thoughts is to sum up the logic of the development of sports thoughts in saints' thoughts from a large number of scattered, scattered and disordered empirical and theoretical knowledge. Then a complete theoretical system of physical education thought is constructed to provide an appropriate idea for the final explanation and transcendence of direct sports ideological experience. Therefore, the author makes a comparative study of Confucius' and Aristotle's sports thoughts from four aspects: time and environment, object and content, method and idea, and purpose and goal. It is believed that "moral etiquette and benevolence" is the core idea of Confucius' sports thought, and "scientific practice" is the theoretical basis of Aristotle's sports thought. According to the development of contemporary sports thought, the author thinks that "harmonious creation theory" is the key to the fusion of their sports thoughts. With the help of the theory of harmonious creation, it is of great benefit to the contemporary sports thought, mainly in the following four aspects: it is beneficial to enrich the content of sports thought, to promote the exchange of sports thought, to promote the development of sports thought and to promote the development of sports thought. It is beneficial to construct sports thought system. After studying the sports thoughts of Confucius and Aristotle, it is found that the comparison and exchange between the two kinds of sports thoughts with representative culture is not only a collision between morality and reason, but also a fusion of humanity and science. Based on the development of contemporary sports thoughts, according to the enlightenment of Confucius and Aristotle, four suggestions are put forward: first, to highlight the role and value of physical education; secondly, to attach importance to the development of sports basic disciplines; Secondly, pay attention to the cultivation of sports moral concept; finally, cultivate the habit of lifelong physical exercise. The origin of the four suggestions is the result of the integration of Confucius and Aristotle's sports thoughts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G80

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹冬;關(guān)于儒、道兩家體育思想的研究[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年02期

2 田東;;盧梭與孔子體育思想的比較[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

3 王云;;孔子的體育思想與奧林匹克精神[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

4 唐永干;田標;;孔子:體育及其研究無法繞過的“界碑”——孔子體育思想研究之一[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

5 金香花;;論“勇”——以孔子與亞里士多德為思想資源[J];理論月刊;2009年09期

6 李柏;鄭秀麗;白文;;古希臘“三杰”體育思想的當代闡釋[J];遼寧體育科技;2009年02期

7 聶嘯虎;亞里士多德體育思想淺析[J];成都體院學(xué)報;1986年01期

8 解毅飛，成永山，豐寶成;孔子的體育思想與實踐[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;1995年S1期

9 歐陽柳青;孔子、顏元與“六藝”教育[J];上海體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;1994年04期

10 陳淑奇;;論競技體育的生命特性[J];山西師大體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年06期

本文編號：2443382