《人民網(wǎng)》與《華盛頓郵報(bào)網(wǎng)》關(guān)于聯(lián)合國氣候會(huì)議報(bào)道的比較研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-02-15 12:36
【摘要】：隨著工業(yè)化革命和信息化的發(fā)展,我們?nèi)祟惿鐣?huì)的物質(zhì)層面獲得了極大的發(fā)展。但在發(fā)展的同時(shí),環(huán)境的不斷惡化也一次又一次炙烤著我們每一個(gè)地球人脆弱的心靈。尤其是進(jìn)入二十一世紀(jì)后,我們一邊在“信息”、“電子”的世界中狂歡著,一邊又被世界各地的“海嘯”、“地震”等“敲打”著。2009年的哥本哈根氣候大會(huì)被喻為“拯救人類的最后一次機(jī)會(huì)”,它的召開帶來了空前的關(guān)注與影響。而隨著氣候問題的逐漸全球化,對(duì)氣候變化的討論逐漸上升為政治層面的博弈,成為各國在國際舞臺(tái)上爭(zhēng)奪話語權(quán)的較量。所以,本研究欲以2010年至2012年的聯(lián)合國氣候大會(huì)報(bào)道為例,對(duì)我國網(wǎng)站http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/(《人民網(wǎng)》英文版)和美國網(wǎng)站http://www. WashingtonPost.com(《華盛頓郵報(bào)網(wǎng)》)兩家網(wǎng)站的相關(guān)報(bào)道進(jìn)行分析與比較。 首先,本文采用定量分析,對(duì)《人民網(wǎng)》(英文版)和《華盛頓郵報(bào)網(wǎng)》兩家網(wǎng)站三年相關(guān)報(bào)道的基本情況進(jìn)行量化分析。其次,運(yùn)用定性內(nèi)容分析,以框架理論為指導(dǎo)思想,分別從報(bào)道主題、報(bào)道結(jié)構(gòu)以及表現(xiàn)形式三大方面定性地描述中美兩國相關(guān)氣候會(huì)議報(bào)道有何特點(diǎn),揭示其差異性所在。在文章此部分,主要體現(xiàn)新聞報(bào)道在傳播過程中如何通過微觀層面的“敘事”體現(xiàn)宏觀層面上的不同“意義”。再次,從社會(huì)環(huán)境的角度分析政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化及新聞理念等因素對(duì)中美報(bào)道的影響和制約。最后,針對(duì)報(bào)道中各自呈現(xiàn)出的優(yōu)點(diǎn)與不足,總結(jié)如何在國際傳播中較為合理地構(gòu)建我國未來的相關(guān)氣候會(huì)議報(bào)道。 研究發(fā)現(xiàn),《人民網(wǎng)》(英文版)在消息來源、報(bào)道體裁和報(bào)道數(shù)量等方面與《華盛頓郵報(bào)網(wǎng)》的報(bào)道相比有較多不同,如其消息來源比較單一、報(bào)道體裁上的把控有待加強(qiáng)、報(bào)道的層次感和豐富性不是很強(qiáng)等,在進(jìn)行新聞采寫時(shí)可多向美國媒體學(xué)習(xí)。同時(shí),目前中美的聯(lián)合國氣候會(huì)議報(bào)道多是站在本國立場(chǎng)設(shè)置報(bào)道主題、選擇新聞素材,帶有較濃的政治色彩,從某種程度來講亦是各國在國際舞臺(tái)上“大展拳腳”、爭(zhēng)奪話語權(quán)的表現(xiàn)。 不過,歸根到底,因中美兩國生產(chǎn)力發(fā)展水平所處階段不同、意識(shí)形態(tài)觀念的不同、各自的文化積淀、新聞理念及地理環(huán)境等方面存有較大差異性,使得作為發(fā)達(dá)國家之一的美國與作為最大發(fā)展中國家的中國在媒介話語權(quán)方面存在著不對(duì)等。所以,作此研究,一方面可以使我們懂得如何借鑒西方媒體豐富的聯(lián)合國氣候會(huì)議報(bào)道經(jīng)驗(yàn)以不斷完善我國新聞業(yè)務(wù)層面的報(bào)道水平；另一方面可以促使我國在進(jìn)行相關(guān)報(bào)道的過程中注意傳播策略,學(xué)會(huì)立足國際視野、以國家大局為重、用人性化的視角看待氣候問題。同時(shí),承擔(dān)起大國應(yīng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任、盡我們應(yīng)盡的義務(wù),以便更好地捍衛(wèi)我國在國際舞臺(tái)上的話語權(quán)。
[Abstract]:With the development of industrialization revolution and information technology, the material level of our human society has been greatly developed. But at the same time, the environment is deteriorating again and again burning the fragile hearts of every one of us on earth. Especially after entering the 21 century, we are reveling in the world of "information" and "electronics" while we are being "tsunamis" all over the world. The 2009 Copenhagen Climate Conference was described as "the last chance to save mankind", which brought unprecedented attention and influence. With the gradual globalization of climate issue, the discussion of climate change has gradually become a game of politics, which becomes a contest for the right to speak in the international arena. Therefore, this study intends to take the report of the United Nations Climate Conference from 2010 to 2012 as an example, to our website http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/(< people's net > English version) and the US website http://www.. WashingtonPost.com (Washington Post) two websites related reports were analyzed and compared. First of all, this paper uses quantitative analysis to analyze the basic situation of three years' related reports of two websites: people's net (English version) and Washington Post (Washington Post). Secondly, using qualitative content analysis and frame theory as the guiding ideology, this paper describes qualitatively the characteristics of the reports of the relevant climate conferences between China and the United States from the three aspects of the reporting theme, the structure of the report and the form of expression, and reveals the differences between them. In this part of the article, it mainly shows how to reflect the different "meanings" in macro level through the "narration" of microcosmic level in the communication process of news reports. Thirdly, the influence and restriction of politics, economy, culture and news idea on Chinese and American reports are analyzed from the angle of social environment. Finally, in view of the advantages and disadvantages of the reports, this paper summarizes how to construct the future climate conference reports in China reasonably in the international communication. The study found that "people's net" (English version) is different from "Washington Post" in terms of source, type and number of reports. For example, the news source is relatively single, and the control of the type of report needs to be strengthened. The level and richness of the report are not very strong, so we can learn from the American media. At the same time, at present, most of the reports of the United Nations climate conferences between China and the United States are based on setting up the reporting themes from their own country's standpoint and selecting news materials, with a strong political color. To some extent, it is also the countries that are "playing a big part" on the international stage. The expression of a fight for the right to speak. However, in the final analysis, due to the difference in the level of productivity development between China and the United States, the difference in ideology, the cultural accumulation, the news concept and the geographical environment, etc., there are great differences between the two countries. As one of the developed countries, the United States and China, as the largest developing countries, have unequal media rights. Therefore, this study can, on the one hand, make us understand how to learn from the rich experience of the United Nations climate conference in the western media in order to continuously improve the reporting level of our country's news business level; On the other hand, we can urge our country to pay attention to the communication strategy in the process of relevant reports, learn to base on the international perspective, attach importance to the overall situation of the country, and treat the climate problem with the view of humanization. At the same time, we should shoulder the responsibilities of the great powers and fulfill our obligations in order to better safeguard our right to speak on the international stage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：G212
本文編號(hào)：2423355
[Abstract]:With the development of industrialization revolution and information technology, the material level of our human society has been greatly developed. But at the same time, the environment is deteriorating again and again burning the fragile hearts of every one of us on earth. Especially after entering the 21 century, we are reveling in the world of "information" and "electronics" while we are being "tsunamis" all over the world. The 2009 Copenhagen Climate Conference was described as "the last chance to save mankind", which brought unprecedented attention and influence. With the gradual globalization of climate issue, the discussion of climate change has gradually become a game of politics, which becomes a contest for the right to speak in the international arena. Therefore, this study intends to take the report of the United Nations Climate Conference from 2010 to 2012 as an example, to our website http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/(< people's net > English version) and the US website http://www.. WashingtonPost.com (Washington Post) two websites related reports were analyzed and compared. First of all, this paper uses quantitative analysis to analyze the basic situation of three years' related reports of two websites: people's net (English version) and Washington Post (Washington Post). Secondly, using qualitative content analysis and frame theory as the guiding ideology, this paper describes qualitatively the characteristics of the reports of the relevant climate conferences between China and the United States from the three aspects of the reporting theme, the structure of the report and the form of expression, and reveals the differences between them. In this part of the article, it mainly shows how to reflect the different "meanings" in macro level through the "narration" of microcosmic level in the communication process of news reports. Thirdly, the influence and restriction of politics, economy, culture and news idea on Chinese and American reports are analyzed from the angle of social environment. Finally, in view of the advantages and disadvantages of the reports, this paper summarizes how to construct the future climate conference reports in China reasonably in the international communication. The study found that "people's net" (English version) is different from "Washington Post" in terms of source, type and number of reports. For example, the news source is relatively single, and the control of the type of report needs to be strengthened. The level and richness of the report are not very strong, so we can learn from the American media. At the same time, at present, most of the reports of the United Nations climate conferences between China and the United States are based on setting up the reporting themes from their own country's standpoint and selecting news materials, with a strong political color. To some extent, it is also the countries that are "playing a big part" on the international stage. The expression of a fight for the right to speak. However, in the final analysis, due to the difference in the level of productivity development between China and the United States, the difference in ideology, the cultural accumulation, the news concept and the geographical environment, etc., there are great differences between the two countries. As one of the developed countries, the United States and China, as the largest developing countries, have unequal media rights. Therefore, this study can, on the one hand, make us understand how to learn from the rich experience of the United Nations climate conference in the western media in order to continuously improve the reporting level of our country's news business level; On the other hand, we can urge our country to pay attention to the communication strategy in the process of relevant reports, learn to base on the international perspective, attach importance to the overall situation of the country, and treat the climate problem with the view of humanization. At the same time, we should shoulder the responsibilities of the great powers and fulfill our obligations in order to better safeguard our right to speak on the international stage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：G212
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 呂學(xué)都;;氣候變化的國際博弈[J];商務(wù)周刊;2007年10期
2 江世亮;;特大雪災(zāi)引發(fā)對(duì)氣候報(bào)道的再思考[J];新聞?dòng)浾?2008年04期
，本文編號(hào)：2423355
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/zhengzhijingjixuelunwen/2423355.html
最近更新
教材專著
