【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)是信息科技革命的產(chǎn)物，對政治、經(jīng)濟、法律等社會生活的各個領(lǐng)域產(chǎn)生著深刻影響。隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的日益發(fā)展，人們對網(wǎng)絡(luò)的依賴性越來越明顯。網(wǎng)絡(luò)在傳播龐大信息的同時，也為一些追求經(jīng)濟利益的侵權(quán)行為打開了方便之門，其中“流氓軟件”已經(jīng)成為了現(xiàn)今網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展中的重要阻礙。對“流氓軟件”的侵權(quán)行為進行相關(guān)法律分析及責任認定并提出解決措施是當前法學研究的熱點。 本文第一部分介紹了“流氓軟件”的概念，通過研究不同權(quán)威機構(gòu)對“流氓軟件”所下的定義，從而對其含義和內(nèi)涵進行準確界定：“流氓軟件”也稱為惡意軟件，它是一種以獲得利益為目的的介于電腦病毒和正規(guī)軟件之間的軟件，在沒有明確提示或未經(jīng)用戶許可，或利用欺詐的方法誘使用戶安裝，在用戶計算機或其他終端上通過后臺運行，具有隱秘性且難以卸載，強行控制用戶行為，嚴重干涉了用戶對個人計算機操作的自主權(quán)、選擇權(quán)及控制權(quán)。第二部分是對國內(nèi)外“流氓軟件”的界定進行橫向分析，通過對比歐盟及美國對“流氓軟件”規(guī)制的研究，總結(jié)出我國在規(guī)制“流氓軟件”方面的不足。目前歐盟及美國都有針對惡意軟件的法律規(guī)制，而我國并沒有針對流氓軟件的立法，甚至沒有對“流氓軟件”進行法律界定，只能從現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)中進行有限適用，這種適用并不能很好地保護計算機用戶的合法權(quán)益。第三部分是從侵權(quán)行為及構(gòu)成出發(fā)，對“流氓軟件”進行侵權(quán)責任認定，并指出其侵權(quán)行為的本質(zhì)，提出“流氓軟件”侵權(quán)的本質(zhì)在于網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下公民信息能力擴張導(dǎo)致的權(quán)利沖突。同時依據(jù)侵權(quán)內(nèi)容不同將“流氓軟件”侵權(quán)行為分為侵害公民的物權(quán)、人格權(quán)和信息自由權(quán)三類，并從侵權(quán)責任的構(gòu)成出發(fā)分析這三種侵權(quán)行為的侵權(quán)責任。第四部分提出我國的相關(guān)法律對新興的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行為的規(guī)制比較滯后，還有很多不足之處。因此為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的健康發(fā)展提供良好的法律秩序，為網(wǎng)民的合法民事權(quán)利構(gòu)建完善的法律依據(jù)，成為當下急需解決的問題。針對“流氓軟件”的侵權(quán)行為，提出完善現(xiàn)有民事法律規(guī)范，在民法中對其進行界定，，并確立公民信息自由權(quán)在民事法律中的相應(yīng)地位，以及確立“流氓軟件”的歸責原則。實現(xiàn)對“流氓軟件”侵權(quán)行為的救濟，規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的惡意侵權(quán)行為，從而實現(xiàn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境的有序發(fā)展，網(wǎng)民權(quán)益的有效保障，推動和諧法治網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境的構(gòu)建。
[Abstract]:Internet is the product of information technology revolution, which has a profound influence on politics, economy, law and other fields of social life. With the increasing development of the Internet, people's dependence on the network is becoming more and more obvious. The network not only spreads huge information, but also opens the door for some torts seeking economic interests. Among them, "rogue software" has become an important obstacle in the development of network. It is the hot point of current law research to analyze the tort of "rogue software" and identify the responsibility and put forward the solution. In the first part of this paper, the concept of "rogue software" is introduced. By studying the definition of "rogue software" made by different authoritative organizations, the meaning and connotation of "rogue software" are accurately defined: "rogue software" is also called malware. It is a software between computer viruses and regular software for the purpose of obtaining benefits, and induces users to install it without explicit instructions or without the user's permission, or by using fraudulent methods to induce the user to install, Running in the background on the user computer or other terminals, it is secret and difficult to uninstall. It forcibly controls the user's behavior and interferes seriously with the user's autonomy, option and control over the operation of the personal computer. The second part is the horizontal analysis of the definition of "rogue software" at home and abroad. By comparing the European Union and the United States on the regulation of "rogue software", the author summarizes the shortcomings of our country in regulating "rogue software". At present, the European Union and the United States have legal regulations against malware, but our country does not have legislation on rogue software, nor has it even defined "rogue software". It can only be limited from the existing laws and regulations. This application does not protect the legitimate rights and interests of computer users. The third part is from the tort act and the constitution, carries on the tort liability confirmation to "the rogue software", and points out its tort behavior essence, The essence of the infringement of "rogue software" lies in the conflict of rights caused by the expansion of citizens' information ability under the network environment. At the same time, according to the different content of tort, the infringement of "rogue software" is divided into three categories: property right, personality right and freedom of information right, and the tort liability of these three kinds of tort acts is analyzed from the constitution of tort liability. In the fourth part, the author points out that the relevant laws of our country are lagging behind in regulating the emerging Internet behavior, and there are still many deficiencies. Therefore, to provide a good legal order for the healthy development of the Internet and to build a sound legal basis for the legal civil rights of Internet users has become an urgent problem. In view of the tort of "rogue software", this paper puts forward to perfect the existing civil legal norms, define them in the civil law, and establish the corresponding status of citizens' right to freedom of information in civil law, as well as establish the principle of imputation of "rogue software". In order to realize the orderly development of network environment, the effective protection of Internet users' rights and interests, and to promote the construction of harmonious legal network environment, the remedy for the infringement of "rogue software" and the regulation of malicious infringement under the network environment are realized.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張偉,杜軍燕,張濤;歸責原則的界定與我國侵權(quán)法的歸責原則[J];北京郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2003年03期

2 張莉;;隱私權(quán)的內(nèi)涵分析[J];中國司法;2007年09期

3 白杉;間諜軟件的入侵及防范[J];計算機安全;2004年12期

4 理琪;;與“流氓軟件”的民間對決[J];法制與社會(銳視版);2006年12期

5 鳳建軍;;流氓軟件法律問題研究[J];河北法學;2008年06期

6 高璀璀;許春明;;“流氓軟件”的違法性分析[J];科技與法律;2007年03期

7 王登;;信息安全領(lǐng)域的新課題——間諜軟件[J];科技情報開發(fā)與經(jīng)濟;2006年20期

8 劉曉慶;;惡意軟件泛濫的原因探析[J];科技情報開發(fā)與經(jīng)濟;2007年22期

9 楊東風;白學清;;間諜軟件的防范措施探討[J];科技信息(科學教研);2008年16期

10 黃瑞華,朱莉欣,汪方軍;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的信息獲取權(quán)[J];情報學報;2001年03期

本文編號：2413817