【摘要】：目前關(guān)于中國在非投資的研究呈現(xiàn)為西方中心主義、以中國為中心、全球體系三類視角的敘事格局,而有關(guān)非洲本土歷史的視角較少。為此,本文基于坦桑尼亞一家中資企業(yè)及所在劍麻產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展歷史,深入分析了該公司的運(yùn)作邏輯中受到的當(dāng)?shù)貏β榘l(fā)展歷史的影響。本文認(rèn)為,中國資本"走出去"的過程也是嵌入東道國當(dāng)?shù)貧v史的過程,中國資本延續(xù)了坦桑尼亞劍麻產(chǎn)業(yè)百年來形成的基本范式,體現(xiàn)在生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營方式的選擇、勞動(dòng)力短缺的應(yīng)對和資本的積累方式三個(gè)維度。雖然中國資本帶來了一些新的元素,但沒有結(jié)構(gòu)性改變,因?yàn)樘股Ｄ醽唲β楫a(chǎn)業(yè)基本范式的背后是始于殖民時(shí)期并一直持續(xù)的西方國家主導(dǎo)下的"中心—外圍"的國際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)格局。
[Abstract]:At present, the research on Chinese investment in Africa presents a narrative pattern of Western centralism, with China as the center and global system as the perspective, while the perspective on African indigenous history is less. Therefore, based on the development history of a Chinese enterprise in Tanzania and its sisal industry, this paper deeply analyzes the influence of the local sisal development history in the operation logic of the company. This paper holds that the process of "going out" of Chinese capital is also a process of embedding the local history of the host country, and that Chinese capital continues the basic paradigm formed by Tanzania's sisal industry over the past hundred years, which is reflected in the choice of production and management mode. The coping of labor shortage and the way of capital accumulation are three dimensions. Although Chinese capital has brought some new elements, there has been no structural change. Behind the basic paradigm of Tanzania's sisal industry is the "center-periphery" international political and economic pattern, which began during the colonial period and continued under the domination of the western countries.
【作者單位】： 中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)人文與發(fā)展學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“多元主體共同參與中國對非援助機(jī)制研究”(16BGJ021) 中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)(2017RW002)階段性成果
【分類號】：F125;F279.2
，

本文編號：2270535