本文選題：漢賦 + 《尚書》�。� 參考：《北方民族大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本課題以漢賦與《尚書》的交叉領(lǐng)域?yàn)檠芯繉?duì)象，全面探討漢賦對(duì)《尚書》的接受狀況，從學(xué)術(shù)文化的角度研究漢賦藝術(shù)精神的發(fā)生，以揭示漢代文學(xué)對(duì)經(jīng)學(xué)摹仿因襲的軌跡與成因，及其學(xué)術(shù)與文學(xué)的雙重意義。從賦學(xué)史的角度而言，目前學(xué)術(shù)界的賦學(xué)研究，雖然涉及到對(duì)漢賦進(jìn)行經(jīng)學(xué)層面的闡釋，但大多只是總體性的概述，較少將漢賦與經(jīng)學(xué)分支進(jìn)行結(jié)合研究。以《尚書》為視角研究賦學(xué)，可算是一個(gè)極有研究價(jià)值的課題。本論文對(duì)漢賦中體現(xiàn)的《尚書》特色進(jìn)行論證分析，正是填補(bǔ)了賦學(xué)史的這一空白。從文學(xué)史的角度而言，漢賦作為漢代文學(xué)的主流與代表，漢賦的發(fā)展從某種程度上說，即體現(xiàn)了漢代文學(xué)的發(fā)展概況，而《尚書》雖是“經(jīng)”，但是也具有一定的文學(xué)色彩，反映了先秦時(shí)期散文的雛形與特色。所以文學(xué)藝術(shù)就作為一種紐帶將漢賦與《尚書》結(jié)合了起來。從學(xué)術(shù)文化史的角度而言，漢代尚未有純文學(xué)的概念，漢人所謂的“文學(xué)”是一個(gè)廣義的學(xué)術(shù)范疇，主要是指經(jīng)藝之學(xué)。如果用現(xiàn)代“文化”的概念來概括漢代“文學(xué)”的稱謂，似乎更實(shí)際、更妥當(dāng)些。漢代的文學(xué)與學(xué)術(shù)文化緊密相聯(lián)，漢代文學(xué)的發(fā)展是以儒學(xué)的繁榮為基礎(chǔ)，創(chuàng)造性地接受了儒學(xué)。一部漢賦發(fā)展史，可以毫不諱言地說亦是一部以儒學(xué)為主的學(xué)術(shù)文化史。漢賦的發(fā)展離不開經(jīng)學(xué)，經(jīng)學(xué)是漢賦的取材寶藏和接受對(duì)象。以此，研究漢賦對(duì)《尚書》的接受具有學(xué)術(shù)、文學(xué)等多方面的意義與價(jià)值。 本課題的基本內(nèi)容主要包括前言、正文、結(jié)語三部分，前言簡(jiǎn)單介紹本課題的選題依據(jù)與研究目的，，與本課題相關(guān)的學(xué)術(shù)界研究現(xiàn)狀和本文研究方法。正文包括四章：第一章重點(diǎn)分析漢賦接受《尚書》的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)與學(xué)術(shù)文化背景。通過對(duì)漢代《尚書》學(xué)發(fā)展概況的考述，對(duì)漢賦作家的《尚書》學(xué)修養(yǎng)的探討，對(duì)漢賦的演進(jìn)流變與漢代《尚書》學(xué)的發(fā)展嬗變關(guān)系的考辨，可以看出儒家“《書》教”傳統(tǒng)在漢代的形成是漢賦對(duì)《尚書》接受的根源與文化背景。本章的論述旨在通過對(duì)《尚書》接受背景的探討，以證明漢賦對(duì)《尚書》的接受是經(jīng)學(xué)與文學(xué)相交融的必然趨勢(shì)，從而為下文的具體論述作鋪墊。第二章具體探討漢賦對(duì)《尚書》的文學(xué)藝術(shù)的接受繼承與開拓創(chuàng)新。漢賦對(duì)《尚書》文學(xué)藝術(shù)特色的接受是為表現(xiàn)思想精神服務(wù)的，本章主要論述漢賦對(duì)《尚書》文體、修辭手法的接受與新變，旨在通過對(duì)漢賦與《尚書》文學(xué)藝術(shù)的共同性與相似性的比較研究，來揭示文學(xué)藝術(shù)在接受史上的重要地位。第三章主要論述漢代賦論對(duì)《尚書》文學(xué)理論的接受與發(fā)展。因?yàn)槭艿饺寮摇啊稌方獭眰鹘y(tǒng)的影響，漢代的賦論在很大程度上接受了《尚書》中的文學(xué)理論，因而本章重點(diǎn)論述漢代賦論對(duì)《尚書》“詩言志”說、“察辭于差”說等文學(xué)理論的接受與創(chuàng)新，從而探尋漢代賦論與《尚書》文學(xué)理論的邏輯關(guān)系。第四章主要論述漢賦對(duì)《尚書》接受之內(nèi)在理路、特色及文學(xué)與學(xué)術(shù)之雙重文化意義。正是因?yàn)榻邮艿膬?nèi)在理路的作用方使得漢賦對(duì)《尚書》之接受獨(dú)具特色，從而促使了漢賦對(duì)《尚書》之接受產(chǎn)生了極大的文學(xué)意義與深遠(yuǎn)的學(xué)術(shù)意義。而對(duì)此意義的闡釋亦是本文寫作的動(dòng)因之一。結(jié)論部分主要是對(duì)本論文做一個(gè)總結(jié)論述，并歸納漢賦對(duì)《尚書》接受之方式和動(dòng)態(tài)特點(diǎn)；揭示漢賦對(duì)《尚書》之接受在學(xué)術(shù)史與文學(xué)史上的雙重意義和影響，并對(duì)今后的研究方向做了展望。
[Abstract]:The subject, taking the cross fields of Han Fu and Shang Shu as the research object, explores the accepting status of Han Fu to Shang Shu in an all-round way, and studies the occurrence of the artistic spirit of Han Fu from the angle of academic culture, in order to reveal the trace and cause of the inheritance of the imitation of Confucian classics, and the dual significance of academic and literature. Although the study of Fu's study of the art circles involves the interpretation of the Confucian classics at the level of the Han Dynasty, most of it is only a general overview, and the study of Han Fu and the branch of Confucian classics is less. From the perspective of literary history, Han Fu is the mainstream and representative of the Han Dynasty literature. The development of Han Fu, to a certain extent, embodies the general situation of the development of the Han Dynasty literature, while Shang Shu is a "Jing", but it also has a certain literary color, reflecting the embryonic form and characteristics of the prose of the pre Qin period. With literature and art as a link, Han Fu and Shang Shu are combined. From the perspective of academic history, the Han Dynasty has not yet had the concept of pure literature. The "Literature" in the Han Dynasty is a broad academic category, mainly refers to the learning of classics. If the term "Literature" of the Han Dynasty is summed up with the concept of modern "culture", it seems that the title of "Literature" in the Han Dynasty is summed up. It is more practical and more appropriate. The literature of the Han Dynasty is closely linked with the academic culture. The development of the Han Dynasty literature is based on the prosperity of Confucianism and creatively accepted Confucianism. A history of the development of Han Fu can be said to be an academic and cultural history of Confucianism. The development of Han Fu can not be separated from Confucian classics, and the Confucian classics are the material treasures of Han Fu. The study of Han Fu's acceptance of Shang Shu is of academic and literary significance.
The basic contents of this subject include preface, text, and conclusion three parts. The preface briefly introduces the basis of the topic and the purpose of the research, the research status of the academic circles and the research methods related to the subject. The text includes four chapters: the first chapter focuses on the analysis of the political, economic and academic cultural background of the Han Fu accepting the book. The study of the development of the Han Dynasty "Shang shu >" and the study of the Han Fu Writers' "Shang shu > learning" and the relationship between the evolution and evolution of Han Fu and the development and evolution of the Han Dynasty "Shang shu > learning", we can see that the formation of the Confucian "book > Teaching" in the Han Dynasty is the root and cultural background of the acceptance of Han Fu to Shang Shu. The study of accepting the background to prove that the acceptance of Han Fu to Shang Shu is the inevitable trend of the combination of classics and literature, thus paving the way for the specific discussion below. The second chapter concretely probes into the acceptance and innovation of the literary and art of Han Fu to the Shang Shu. This chapter mainly discusses the acceptance and new changes of the style of Han Fu to "Shang shu >" and the rhetorical devices. The purpose of this chapter is to reveal the important position of literature and art in the history of acceptance through a comparative study of the common and similar characteristics of Han Fu and "Shang shu > literature and art". The third chapter mainly discusses the acceptance and development of the Han Dynasty Fu theory to the literary theory of "Shang shu >". In order to be influenced by the Confucian tradition of "< book > Teaching", the Fu theory of Han Dynasty accepted the literary theory in Shang Shu to a great extent. Therefore, this chapter focuses on the acceptance and innovation of the literary theory of the Han Dynasty Fu theory on "Shang shu > poetry and ambition", "inspection of words in poor" and so on, so as to explore the logical relationship between the Han Dynasty Fu theory and the Shang book and literary theory. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the dual cultural significance of Han Fu to the acceptance of "Shang Shu", and the dual cultural significance of literature and scholarship. It is precisely because the internal logic of acceptance makes the Han Fu unique to the acceptance of Shang Shu, which has led to the great literary and profound academic significance of the Han Fu to the acceptance of the book. The interpretation of this meaning is also one of the reasons for the writing of this article. The conclusion is mainly a summary and discussion of this paper, and a summary of the ways and dynamic characteristics of the acceptance of Han Fu to Shang Shu, and the double meaning and influence of the acceptance of Han Fu to "Shang Shu" in the history of academic and literary history and the prospect of the future research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：I206.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王敏;簡(jiǎn)論漢賦的意義和局限[J];江西廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

2 鄭明璋;論漢賦中的仁政思想[J];臨沂師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

3 劉美生;從《箴》看漢賦的基本特點(diǎn)[J];黔東南民族師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

4 張啟成;論一代文學(xué)之漢賦[J];黔南民族師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

5 王煥然;讖緯的流行及其對(duì)漢賦的影響[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版);2002年05期

6 楊s

本文編號(hào)：2025290