發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-08 13:07

  本文選題：旅游生態(tài)足跡模型 + 世界自然遺產(chǎn)地�。� 參考：《重慶工商大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)是世界上第二大遺產(chǎn)國(guó)。世界遺產(chǎn)是不可再生的稀缺資源，具有旅游價(jià)值、科學(xué)價(jià)值、藝術(shù)價(jià)值等多方面的綜合價(jià)值，對(duì)世界遺產(chǎn)的保護(hù)需要且必要。但遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)工作面臨來(lái)自政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、環(huán)境以及社會(huì)文化等多方面的挑戰(zhàn)，如何在實(shí)踐中正確處理遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)與遺產(chǎn)利用的矛盾辯證關(guān)系，是當(dāng)今學(xué)界及各地政府關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。大量理論研究及實(shí)踐證明，世界遺產(chǎn)旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展是協(xié)調(diào)遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)與利用關(guān)系的關(guān)鍵所在。 本文構(gòu)建由旅游餐飲、旅游住宿、旅游交通、旅游觀光、旅游購(gòu)物、旅游休閑及旅游固體廢棄物處理七個(gè)子模型構(gòu)成的旅游生態(tài)足跡模型，并利用該模型定量研究世界自然遺產(chǎn)地旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展，并以武隆喀斯特世界自然遺產(chǎn)地為例對(duì)其遺產(chǎn)旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r進(jìn)行測(cè)評(píng)，在綜合分析模型計(jì)算結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)之上，對(duì)其提出遺產(chǎn)旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展策略。 通過(guò)本文研究分析，得出以下結(jié)論： 1、影響區(qū)域旅游生態(tài)足跡的因素有游客接待量、游客消費(fèi)行為模式、游客空間行為模式、區(qū)域旅游設(shè)施規(guī)模等。其中，游客接待量是影響旅游生態(tài)足跡最主要的因素。 2、武隆喀斯特世界自然地旅游生態(tài)足跡與游客接待量正相關(guān)。在現(xiàn)有條件不變的情況下，武隆喀斯特世界自然遺產(chǎn)地保障其旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展的臨界游客接待量為394.48萬(wàn)人次。 3、從武隆世界自然遺產(chǎn)地的的旅游生態(tài)足跡構(gòu)成來(lái)看，旅游餐飲生態(tài)足跡、旅游交通生態(tài)足跡和旅游固體廢棄物處理生態(tài)足跡占據(jù)旅游生態(tài)足跡的絕大部分。 4、2007—2012年，武隆喀斯特世界自然遺產(chǎn)地旅游生態(tài)足跡平均為18285.94hm2，旅游生態(tài)承載力為40421.98hm2;人均旅游生態(tài)足跡平均值為0.0094hm2，，人均旅游生態(tài)承載力的平均值為328.628hm2。說(shuō)明武隆喀斯特世界自然遺產(chǎn)地旅游發(fā)展處于“可持續(xù)”狀態(tài)，但旅游生態(tài)盈余逐年減小并迅速下降，表明其旅游“可持續(xù)”發(fā)展程度越來(lái)越低。 在對(duì)計(jì)算結(jié)果綜合分析的基礎(chǔ)之上，本文從降低區(qū)域旅游生態(tài)足跡和提升區(qū)域生態(tài)承載力兩方面提出武隆喀斯特世界自然遺產(chǎn)地旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展策略，以期有助于協(xié)調(diào)旅游開(kāi)發(fā)與利用的矛盾辯證關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:China is the second largest heritage country in the world. World Heritage is a non-renewable scarce resource, which has the comprehensive value of tourism value, scientific value, artistic value and so on. It is necessary and necessary to protect the World Heritage. However, the work of heritage protection is facing challenges from political, economic, environmental and social and cultural aspects. How to correctly handle the dialectical relationship between heritage protection and heritage utilization in practice is the focus of attention of scholars and local governments. A large number of theoretical research and practice prove that sustainable development of world heritage tourism is the key to coordinate the relationship between heritage protection and utilization. The tourism ecological footprint model based on seven sub-models of tourism leisure and tourism solid waste disposal is used to quantitatively study the sustainable development of tourism in World Natural Heritage sites. Taking the Karst World Natural Heritage in Wulong as an example, the sustainable development of heritage tourism is evaluated. On the basis of the calculation results of comprehensive analysis model, the sustainable development strategy of heritage tourism is put forward. The main conclusions are as follows: 1. The factors influencing the ecological footprint of regional tourism are the amount of tourists, the consumption behavior of tourists, the spatial behavior of tourists, the scale of regional tourism facilities and so on. Among them, tourist reception is the most important factor affecting tourism ecological footprint. 2. Wulong karst world natural tourism ecological footprint is positively related to tourist reception. Under the condition that the existing conditions are unchanged, the critical tourist reception for the Wulong Karst World Natural Heritage site to ensure its sustainable tourism development is 3.9448 million person-times. Judging from the composition of the tourism ecological footprint of the Wulong World Natural Heritage site, The ecological footprint of tourism and catering, the ecological footprint of tourism transportation and the ecological footprint of disposal of tourism solid waste occupy the vast majority of the ecological footprint of tourism. The average ecological footprint of tourism in Wulong Karst World Natural Heritage site is 18285.94hm2, the ecological carrying capacity of tourism is 40421.98hm2, the average per capita tourism ecological footprint is 0.0094hm2, and the average per capita tourism ecological carrying capacity is 328.628hm2. It shows that the tourism development of Wulong Karst World Natural Heritage area is in a "sustainable" state, but the tourism ecological surplus decreases year by year and decreases rapidly. It shows that its tourism "sustainable" development level is getting lower and lower. On the basis of comprehensive analysis of the results of calculation, This paper puts forward the sustainable development strategy of tourism in Karst World Heritage area of Wulong from the aspects of reducing the ecological footprint of regional tourism and enhancing the regional ecological carrying capacity in order to help coordinate the contradictory dialectical relationship between tourism development and utilization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F592.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙珊珊;劉玲;;基于旅游生態(tài)足跡模型的山東省旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展評(píng)價(jià)[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2008年09期

2 陳耀華,趙星爍;中國(guó)世界遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)與利用研究[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2003年04期

3 李維余;;森林生態(tài)旅游可持續(xù)發(fā)展評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2008年02期

4 阮儀三,肖建莉;尋求遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)和旅游發(fā)展的“雙贏”之路[J];城市規(guī)劃;2003年06期

5 孫克勤;;中國(guó)的世界遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)與可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究[J];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

6 馬國(guó)民;徐淑梅;李圓慧;;帽兒山景區(qū)旅游生態(tài)足跡研究[J];地理與地理信息科學(xué);2011年05期

7 蔣依依,王仰麟,卜心國(guó),王建華;國(guó)內(nèi)外生態(tài)足跡模型應(yīng)用的回顧與展望[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2005年02期

8 章錦河,張捷;旅游生態(tài)足跡模型及黃山市實(shí)證分析[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

9 吳必虎,李咪咪,黃國(guó)平;中國(guó)世界遺產(chǎn)地保護(hù)與旅游需求關(guān)系[J];地理研究;2002年05期

10 蔣依依;王仰麟;彭建;楊磊;張?jiān)?;基于旅游生態(tài)足跡模型的旅游區(qū)可持續(xù)發(fā)展度量——以云南省麗江納西族自治縣為例[J];地理研究;2006年06期

本文編號(hào)：1995890