本文選題：知識(shí)分子群體 + 社會(huì)主導(dǎo)價(jià)值�。� 參考：《理論與改革》2017年03期

【摘要】：知識(shí)分子群體之于社會(huì)主導(dǎo)價(jià)值認(rèn)同的問題發(fā)展軌跡呈現(xiàn)為分層"問題流":認(rèn)知逆反化—情感淡漠化—意志軟弱化—行為自由化。四大層次相互遞進(jìn)、相互包含、相互轉(zhuǎn)換。群體價(jià)值與社會(huì)主導(dǎo)價(jià)值間"倫理普遍性"的理想形態(tài),因無法在政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化及社會(huì)諸領(lǐng)域獲得實(shí)踐層面的滿足,由此導(dǎo)致的"思維—存在"分離催生出群體價(jià)值認(rèn)同的"問題源"。問題的解決必須訴求于"國(guó)家—學(xué)�！彝ァ鐣�(huì)"諸層面的倫理正義建構(gòu),以知識(shí)分子群體價(jià)值觀、社會(huì)主導(dǎo)價(jià)值觀及社會(huì)倫理正義三者間"預(yù)定和諧"為目標(biāo),達(dá)到"思維—存在"的現(xiàn)實(shí)和解。
[Abstract]:The development of intellectual group to the social dominant value identity is presented as a stratified "problem stream": cognitive inversion, emotion indifference, will weakness and behavior liberalization. The four levels are mutually progressive, contained and transformed. The ideal form of "ethical universality" between group value and social dominant value is unable to obtain practical satisfaction in political, economic, cultural and social fields. As a result, the separation of thinking and being gives birth to the problem source of group value identity. The solution of the problem must be based on the construction of ethical justice at the various levels of "state, school, family and society", with the goal of "predetermined harmony" among intellectual group values, social dominant values and social ethical justice. To achieve the "mind-existence" realistic reconciliation.
【作者單位】： 南昌工程學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金一般項(xiàng)目“公共精神培育的倫理基礎(chǔ)研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):15BZX110) 江西省教育科學(xué)“三五”規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“高校青年教師認(rèn)同與踐行社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):16YB149) “江西省普通本科高校中青年教師發(fā)展計(jì)劃訪問學(xué)者專項(xiàng)資金”(2016-04)資助
【分類號(hào)】：D663.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王國(guó)銀;;現(xiàn)代德性治理視域中的和諧社會(huì)[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2006年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1989727