本文選題：誠(chéng)信　切入點(diǎn)：政務(wù)誠(chéng)信　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：誠(chéng)信是中華民族的傳統(tǒng)美德。學(xué)界對(duì)誠(chéng)信的理解,涵蓋了倫理學(xué)、法學(xué)、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、心理學(xué)等多個(gè)研究角度。政務(wù)誠(chéng)信不同于一般概念上的誠(chéng)信,它既有誠(chéng)信的基本屬性,又有其特殊性,要求政務(wù)人員要在政務(wù)活動(dòng)中做到誠(chéng)實(shí)守信。政務(wù)守信作為政務(wù)誠(chéng)信的首要要求和基本內(nèi)涵,其基本內(nèi)涵就是要待民以誠(chéng)、對(duì)民守信。政務(wù)失信是與政務(wù)誠(chéng)信相對(duì)應(yīng)的范疇,指的是政務(wù)誠(chéng)信的缺乏和喪失。從人性論、媒體報(bào)道和廣大群眾的親身感受等方面,我們可以明確知道當(dāng)前中國(guó)社會(huì)確實(shí)存在著政務(wù)失信問題。當(dāng)前中國(guó)的政務(wù)失信現(xiàn)象雖然不占主流,但己經(jīng)比較嚴(yán)重,對(duì)政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、社會(huì)等方面都可能有較大危害。政務(wù)失信的主要表現(xiàn)是承諾言行相悖,政策朝令夕改,信息暗箱操作,政績(jī)?cè)旒俸陀箲猩⑼�、不作為、慢作為、亂作為。政務(wù)失信的產(chǎn)生過程是動(dòng)態(tài)的、復(fù)雜的,在這個(gè)過程中多重因素相互作用。具體說來,可從制度環(huán)境、誠(chéng)信文化和官員對(duì)自利的不當(dāng)追求三個(gè)方面來分析。政務(wù)失信治理的指導(dǎo)思想是中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義理論體系,其目標(biāo)為提高政務(wù)誠(chéng)信水平和社會(huì)信用水平,其要求是政府主導(dǎo)和社會(huì)共同參與。治理政務(wù)失信,必須健全相關(guān)制度安排,要?jiǎng)?chuàng)新政務(wù)評(píng)價(jià)制度,建立及時(shí)回應(yīng)民眾需求制度,完善政務(wù)失信監(jiān)督制度,健全政務(wù)失信懲戒制度。治理政務(wù)失信,必須要重視失信治理的工具選擇,要科學(xué)運(yùn)用管制工具規(guī)制自利沖動(dòng),大力發(fā)展信息工具制約自利行為,合理利用市場(chǎng)工具規(guī)范自利裁量。治理政務(wù)失信,必須要建立文化方略,要樹立政務(wù)誠(chéng)信價(jià)值觀,弘揚(yáng)政務(wù)誠(chéng)信傳統(tǒng)美德,營(yíng)造誠(chéng)實(shí)守信的社會(huì)氛圍。
[Abstract]:Honesty is the traditional virtue of the Chinese nation.The understanding of honesty in academic circles includes ethics, law, economics, sociology, psychology and so on.The integrity of government affairs is different from the general concept of honesty and credit. It has both the basic attributes of honesty and its particularity, which requires government officials to be honest and trustworthy in government affairs activities.As the primary requirement and basic intension of government honesty, the basic connotation of government administration is to treat the people with sincerity and keep their faith to the people.Government dishonesty is a category corresponding to government integrity, which refers to the lack and loss of government credibility.From the point of view of human nature, media reports and the masses' personal feelings, we can clearly know that there is a problem of government dishonesty in Chinese society at present.At present, the phenomenon of government dishonesty in China is not the mainstream, but it is serious and may be harmful to politics, economy, culture, society and so on.The main manifestation of government dishonesty is the contradiction of promises and deeds, the change of policy, the operation of information box, the falsehood and idleness of political achievements, the inaction, the slow action and the disorderly action.The process of government dishonesty is dynamic and complex, in which multiple factors interact.Specifically, it can be analyzed from three aspects: institutional environment, culture of integrity and improper pursuit of self-interest by officials.The guiding ideology of governance of government dishonesty is the theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Its goal is to improve the level of government honesty and social credit, and its requirement is the government leading and the society participating together.It is necessary to perfect the arrangement of relevant systems, innovate the evaluation system of government affairs, establish the system of responding to the needs of the public in time, perfect the supervision system of government affairs dishonesty, and perfect the disciplinary system of government affairs dishonesty.In order to deal with government dishonesty, we must pay attention to the choice of tools, use control tools scientifically to regulate self-interest impulse, vigorously develop information tools to restrict self-interest behavior, and make rational use of market tools to regulate self-interest discretion.In order to deal with the breach of trust in government affairs, we must establish a cultural strategy, set up the values of honesty in government affairs, carry forward the traditional virtue of honesty in government affairs, and create a social atmosphere of honesty and trustworthiness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張潤(rùn)澤;張燮;;國(guó)內(nèi)政治信任研究的理論進(jìn)路及其發(fā)展趨向[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2014年03期

2 涂永珍;;誠(chéng)信文化視角下我國(guó)政務(wù)誠(chéng)信建設(shè)的法理思考[J];征信;2012年03期

3 杜娟;胡沫;;論政府誠(chéng)信建設(shè)的重塑路徑[J];理論研究;2012年02期

4 楊秋菊;;政務(wù)誠(chéng)信的缺失與重建[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)之友;2012年03期

5 張潤(rùn)澤;;略論改革認(rèn)同的基本意涵及其生成條件[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2010年05期

6 范柏乃;龍海波;;我國(guó)地方政府失信形成機(jī)理與懲罰機(jī)制研究[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

7 于建嶸;;當(dāng)前我國(guó)群體性事件的主要類型及其基本特征[J];中國(guó)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

8 范柏乃;湯亞玲;;縣級(jí)政府信用缺失的博弈分析[J];行政與法;2009年09期

9 向平;;服務(wù)型政府建設(shè)中的地方政府誠(chéng)信缺失及原因分析[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2007年06期

10 張道理;張翔宇;;加強(qiáng)公務(wù)員誠(chéng)信建設(shè)的措施探究[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2007年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 公維友;我國(guó)民主行政的社會(huì)建構(gòu)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 宋強(qiáng);政務(wù)誠(chéng)信建設(shè)中誠(chéng)信價(jià)值觀培育研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2013年

2 術(shù)軼威;我國(guó)地方政府誠(chéng)信建設(shè)探究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

3 黃宇亮;中國(guó)公務(wù)員激勵(lì)機(jī)制研究[D];西北大學(xué);2007年

4 謝琳惠;構(gòu)建誠(chéng)信政府的理論及實(shí)踐研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2005年

5 張國(guó)仲;誠(chéng)信政府制度建設(shè)之探討[D];西南交通大學(xué);2004年

6 李剛;論政府誠(chéng)信與制度約束[D];重慶大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1705634