本文選題：社會(huì)中間層　切入點(diǎn)：公信力　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)政治體制改革的不斷深入，為社會(huì)中間層主體的發(fā)展提供了條件，，涌現(xiàn)了大量的社會(huì)中間層主體，它們?cè)谡�、�?jīng)濟(jì)、文化等廣泛社會(huì)領(lǐng)域中發(fā)揮著不可替代的作用。但是，社會(huì)中間層失靈也以多種形式表現(xiàn)出來，公信力流失就是其中重要的失靈現(xiàn)象，會(huì)影響到社會(huì)中間層的生存與發(fā)展，所以，防治社會(huì)中間層公信力流失，有效提升社會(huì)中間層的公信度是一個(gè)需要迫切解決的現(xiàn)實(shí)課題。 本文以社會(huì)中間層的涵義為突破點(diǎn)，引出當(dāng)前社會(huì)中間層公信力流失嚴(yán)重的問題，然后，深度剖析了社會(huì)中間層公信力的基礎(chǔ)，為提出提高社會(huì)中間層公信度的實(shí)施辦法做好了鋪墊。其次，描述當(dāng)前我國(guó)社會(huì)中間層公信力流失的表現(xiàn)，這些表現(xiàn)為文章選題提供了現(xiàn)實(shí)來源。接下來，解析了致使社會(huì)中間層公信力流失的大部原因。除了政府的因素外，社會(huì)發(fā)展氛圍也影響了其公信力，再加上組織的自律機(jī)制不完善，導(dǎo)致失信行為時(shí)有發(fā)生。文章最后部分，自然而然的明確了治理我國(guó)社會(huì)中間層公信力流失的措施——要完善我國(guó)社會(huì)中間層的法律監(jiān)管。針對(duì)相關(guān)法律的現(xiàn)狀，我們應(yīng)當(dāng)在立法取向上將社會(huì)中間層的角色定位為政府的合作伙伴，并制定社會(huì)中間層個(gè)體專門法；要大幅度降低成立社會(huì)中間層的準(zhǔn)入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并最終對(duì)社會(huì)中間層的成立登記只實(shí)行自由設(shè)立制和登記報(bào)備制并行；同時(shí)進(jìn)一步健全有關(guān)社會(huì)中間層結(jié)構(gòu)治理的法律法規(guī)；與此同時(shí)，確立完善有關(guān)社會(huì)中間層信息公開的法律規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:The deepening reform of the economic and political system of our country has provided the conditions for the development of the social middle-tier subjects, and a large number of social middle-tier subjects have emerged. They are in the political and economic fields. Culture plays an irreplaceable role in a wide range of social fields. However, the failure of the middle layer of society is also manifested in many forms. The loss of credibility is an important failure phenomenon, which will affect the survival and development of the middle class of society. Therefore, preventing and controlling the loss of the credibility of the middle class of society and effectively promoting the credibility of the middle layer of society is a realistic subject that needs to be solved urgently. This paper takes the meaning of the social middle layer as the breakthrough point, leads to the serious problem of the loss of the credibility of the social middle layer, and then, deeply analyzes the foundation of the credibility of the social middle layer. It lays the groundwork for the implementation of the measures to improve the credibility of the middle stratum of the society. Secondly, it describes the performance of the loss of credibility of the middle stratum of our society at present, which provides a realistic source for the selection of the topic of the article. This paper analyzes most of the causes of the loss of credibility in the middle class of society. Besides the factors of the government, the atmosphere of social development also affects the credibility of the society. In addition to the imperfection of the self-discipline mechanism of the organization, the behavior of dishonesty occurs from time to time. In the last part of the article, Naturally, the measures to deal with the loss of credibility in the middle layer of our society are clearly defined-to improve the legal supervision of the middle class of our society. In view of the current situation of the relevant laws, We should position the role of the middle level of society as a partner of the government in the legislative orientation, and formulate specific laws for individuals in the middle of society; we should substantially reduce the standards of entry for the establishment of the middle class of society. In the end, the establishment and registration of the middle class of society should be accompanied only by the system of free establishment and registration and reporting; at the same time, the laws and regulations concerning the governance of the structure of the intermediate layer of society should be further improved; at the same time, Establish and perfect the legal regulation of the disclosure of information in the middle of the society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.182

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 楊秀香;誠(chéng)信:從傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)向市場(chǎng)社會(huì)[J];道德與文明;2002年04期

2 劉大洪,李華振;政府失靈語(yǔ)境下的第三部門研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年06期

3 鄭少華;經(jīng)濟(jì)法的本質(zhì):一種社會(huì)法觀的解說[J];法學(xué);1999年02期

4 潘左華;轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期我國(guó)第三部門缺失與構(gòu)建[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

5 李麗;;非營(yíng)利組織公信力缺失的表現(xiàn)及其治理對(duì)策[J];黨政干部論壇;2010年10期

6 孟慶瑜;徐超;;論社會(huì)中間層及其在經(jīng)濟(jì)法中的角色定位[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

7 胡友紅;;試析公眾對(duì)非營(yíng)利組織的信任危機(jī)[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年10期

8 史際春,李青山;論經(jīng)濟(jì)法的理念[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

9 倪才龍;祝紅霞;;論社會(huì)中介組織的新一類經(jīng)濟(jì)法主體地位[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2006年04期

10 郭道暉;權(quán)力的多元化與社會(huì)化[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年01期

中國(guó)博士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前1條

1 張明;非營(yíng)利組織的治理機(jī)制研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1581800