本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法治 法律界限 特點 實現(xiàn)途徑　出處：《揚州大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：社會對法律的普遍認同并通過法律避免或解決糾紛的意識是法治建設(shè)所不可缺少的理念支撐,但推崇法治、信仰法律的前提在于對法治與法律的理性認知。法律并非萬能之器,法治建設(shè)也并非“法治大躍進”。在法治社會中,法律有因其價值追求而不應(yīng)為的領(lǐng)域,也有因自身能力局限而無法勝任的事務(wù)。面對法律的“應(yīng)”與“不應(yīng)”、“能”與“不能”,立法者、執(zhí)法者、司法者只有堅守法律的“本分”才能避免對社會的不當壓制以及對法律能量的不當消耗,以實現(xiàn)法治事業(yè)的穩(wěn)健發(fā)展。而關(guān)于法律的界限具體如何則著實難以描述,尤其是在法治社會中,法律所涉及的領(lǐng)域相當廣泛,不同性質(zhì)的法律目的、范圍各異,很難提供統(tǒng)一、可供操作的“標準性尺子”,因此,從不同維度進行迂回探索便成為替代方法。而隨著對法律內(nèi)容與形式、手段與工具上特點的深入考察,可以發(fā)現(xiàn),在不同視域下,法律有著不同的界限要求。法律的界限不僅涉及法律可以調(diào)整或不應(yīng)調(diào)整的領(lǐng)域,還包括在法律調(diào)整范圍內(nèi)法律手段所應(yīng)達到的程度問題,這也說明,法律的界限并不是針對所有法律、某類法律或者是某個法律的泛泛而談,而是具體法律規(guī)范所需考量的標準。正當有益的法律規(guī)定應(yīng)當同時滿足不同視域下法律的界限要求。而法律終究由人制定,其具體內(nèi)容是否適當、必要、均衡最終取決于人的主觀判斷,法律的界限具體如何不可避免地包含著主觀因素,故而,法律的界限又與其所處的時空相關(guān)。在不同時期、不同地域可能會有不同的價值理念,法律的邊界也會有所不同,并且隨著時間的發(fā)展,隨著價值判斷與選擇的變化,法律的界限也會隨之擴張或限縮。在我國的法治建設(shè)過程中,恰當?shù)姆梢?guī)定對政治經(jīng)濟建設(shè)的推動作用顯而易見,但并非所有的法律條文都能萬無一失,我國現(xiàn)行法律中不乏存有爭議甚至飽受詬病的條款。為了避免權(quán)力與情感上的沖動,避免法律在制定、運行各個環(huán)節(jié)僭越的風險,不僅需要不斷提高法律職業(yè)者的素質(zhì),更需要健全預(yù)防與懲戒機制,為法律“適得其所”提供制度保障。
[Abstract]:The general recognition of the law and the consciousness of avoiding or resolving disputes through the law is an indispensable concept support for the construction of the rule of law, but the rule of law is respected. The premise of belief in law lies in the rational cognition of the rule of law and the law. Law is not a universal instrument, nor is the construction of the rule of law "the great leap forward of the rule of law". In a society governed by law, law has a field that should not be due to its pursuit of value. There are also incompetent affairs because of their own limitations. Facing the law "should" and "should not", "can" and "cannot", legislators, law enforcers. Only by adhering to the "duty" of the law can the judiciary avoid the improper suppression of the society and the improper consumption of the legal energy. In order to achieve the steady development of the cause of the rule of law. But it is difficult to describe the specific boundaries of the law, especially in the society of the rule of law, the law involves a wide range of fields, different nature of the legal purposes. The range is varied and it is difficult to provide a uniform, operable "standard ruler", so exploring roundabout from different dimensions becomes an alternative. And with the content and form of the law. From the in-depth investigation of the characteristics of the means and tools, it can be found that under different horizons, the law has different boundary requirements. The limits of the law not only involve the areas in which the law can be adjusted or should not be adjusted. It also includes the question of the extent to which legal means should be achieved in the context of legal adjustment, which also shows that the limits of law are not addressed to all laws, certain types of laws or the generality of a particular law. It is the standard that the concrete legal norm needs to consider. The legitimate and beneficial legal provisions should meet the boundary requirements of the law under different horizons at the same time. However, the law is ultimately formulated by the person, whether its specific content is appropriate and necessary. The equilibrium ultimately depends on the subjective judgment of the human being, and how the boundaries of the law inevitably contain subjective factors, therefore, the boundaries of the law are related to the time and space in which they are located, and in different periods. Different regions may have different values, the boundaries of law will be different, and with the development of time, with the change of value judgment and choice. In the process of our country's legal construction, the proper legal provisions can promote the political and economic construction obviously, but not all the legal provisions can be foolproof. In order to avoid the power and emotional impulse, to avoid the risk of the law in making, running all the links overstepped in order to avoid the power and emotional impulse, there are many controversial and even criticized provisions in the current law of our country. It is necessary not only to improve the quality of the legal profession, but also to perfect the mechanism of prevention and punishment so as to provide the system guarantee for the law.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D920.0

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 房永;;論服務(wù)型政府的基本內(nèi)涵及其實現(xiàn)途徑[J];徐州教育學院學報;2008年04期

2 劉明瑛,任松國;論集體主義道德導向的實現(xiàn)途徑[J];山東省青年管理干部學院學報;1999年05期

3 薛鋒;;建立保持共產(chǎn)黨員先進性長效機制的實現(xiàn)途徑[J];經(jīng)濟與社會發(fā)展;2006年03期

4 潘永江;人民利益的內(nèi)涵與實現(xiàn)途徑[J];中央社會主義學院學報;2003年01期

5 牟紅;;我國城鄉(xiāng)基本公共服務(wù)均等化的現(xiàn)狀及實現(xiàn)途徑[J];瀘州職業(yè)技術(shù)學院學報;2012年04期

6 楊楠;;試論政府責任及其實現(xiàn)途徑[J];蘭州學刊;2011年05期

7 陳純?nèi)?王迪;;“美好生活”的解讀及其實現(xiàn)[J];邵陽學院學報(社會科學版);2013年02期

8 王壽;王傳君;;公民有效參與公共政策制定的實現(xiàn)途徑[J];黨史博采(理論);2009年04期

9 葉金松;吳存鳳;;“責任政府”建設(shè)及其實現(xiàn)途徑探討[J];電子科技大學學報(社科版);2007年04期

10 白利萍;;解讀我國中小企業(yè)社會責任的實現(xiàn)途徑與法律規(guī)制[J];學理論;2009年16期

相關(guān)會議論文 前3條

1 呂景春;;構(gòu)建基于社會主義核心價值體系的公共價值觀[A];新規(guī)劃·新視野·新發(fā)展——天津市社會科學界第七屆學術(shù)年會優(yōu)秀論文集《天津?qū)W術(shù)文庫》（上）[C];2011年

2 李建橋;王秀東;;社會主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)“兩個反哺”的理論構(gòu)架與實現(xiàn)途徑研究[A];紀念農(nóng)村改革開放30周年學術(shù)研討會暨建所50周年慶典論文集[C];2008年

3 胡瑤;;試論血站業(yè)務(wù)檔案價值的實現(xiàn)途徑[A];行與知——社會主義文化大發(fā)展大繁榮中的檔案工作[C];2012年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前6條

1 司曉雪;中國大學校歌的文化功能及其實現(xiàn)途徑研究[D];河南理工大學;2015年

2 李嘉寧;非政府組織問責研究[D];長春工業(yè)大學;2016年

3 張亮;中國共產(chǎn)黨依憲執(zhí)政研究[D];河北大學;2016年

4 錢貝;法治社會中法律的界限研究[D];揚州大學;2017年

5 邢繼勇;非洲舉辦奧運會可能性與實現(xiàn)途徑的研究[D];沈陽體育學院;2012年

6 丁貝;中國環(huán)保NGO的價值理念研究[D];湖南師范大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1484131