本文關(guān)鍵詞： 改革開放 行政體制改革 目標(biāo) 公共性　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2014年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自1978年中國(guó)改革開放事業(yè)正式啟幕以來，30余年間，，中國(guó)各項(xiàng)改革發(fā)展已經(jīng)取得了巨大成就。中國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型、政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等體制轉(zhuǎn)軌都在快速推進(jìn)，中國(guó)在國(guó)際社會(huì)的影響力也越來越大。在中國(guó)的改革事業(yè)中，有關(guān)行政體制改革的問題，一直是社會(huì)關(guān)注的話題。行政體制改革是中國(guó)各項(xiàng)改革事業(yè)中的“關(guān)鍵部位”，是經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的瓶頸，也是政治體制改革的突破口。 在事物發(fā)展過程中，目標(biāo)往往決定了事物總體發(fā)展方向，是一切行為選擇的前提，從根本上制約和決定著解決問題的措施與模式。就行政體制改革而言，其目標(biāo)是行政系統(tǒng)應(yīng)當(dāng)努力達(dá)到的規(guī)格和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，行政體制改革目標(biāo)的確定對(duì)改革的成效往往起著先導(dǎo)性的決定作用。顯然，對(duì)行政體制改革目標(biāo)的研究具有重要意義。以改革開放為時(shí)間節(jié)點(diǎn)，自1982年第一輪行政體制改革至黨的十八大前，共進(jìn)行了六次大規(guī)模的改革。2013年又開啟了新一輪改革�？傮w上說，歷次改革目標(biāo)明確、各有側(cè)重，并基本取得了預(yù)期成效。盡管如此，縱觀歷次改革的目標(biāo)，仍然存在不盡合理之處，如缺乏戰(zhàn)略性、系統(tǒng)性和穩(wěn)定性。 本文從行政體制改革目標(biāo)的內(nèi)涵分析入手，從行政體制改革目標(biāo)設(shè)計(jì)的應(yīng)然范疇、價(jià)值取向和生態(tài)要素三個(gè)方面構(gòu)建目標(biāo)分析框架，同時(shí)在探討行政體制改革目標(biāo)相關(guān)理論的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)中國(guó)歷次行政體制改革的目標(biāo)進(jìn)行了較為系統(tǒng)的梳理、概括、分析和評(píng)價(jià)；為拓寬研究視野，概要介紹和分析了當(dāng)代西方政府行政改革的目標(biāo)選擇以及對(duì)中國(guó)行政體制改革目標(biāo)設(shè)計(jì)的借鑒與啟示；基于上述分析，進(jìn)一步提出對(duì)新時(shí)期中國(guó)行政體制改革目標(biāo)的若干思考：主要涵蓋全面深化改革總目標(biāo)與中國(guó)行政體制改革目標(biāo)關(guān)系探討、新時(shí)期行政體制改革目標(biāo)設(shè)定的原則與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、政府角色的定位及目標(biāo)實(shí)現(xiàn)保障等內(nèi)容。
[Abstract]:Since 1978, the reform and opening up of China has been officially launched for more than 30 years, China's reform and development has made great achievements. China's social transformation, politics, economy. The transition of culture and other systems is advancing rapidly, and China's influence in the international community is growing. In China's reform, the reform of the administrative system is related to the issue. The reform of the administrative system is the "key part" of all the reform undertakings in China, the bottleneck of the reform of the economic system, and the breakthrough of the reform of the political system. In the process of the development of things, the goal often determines the overall direction of development of things, is the premise of all behavior choices, and fundamentally restricts and determines the measures and modes to solve the problems. As far as the reform of administrative system is concerned. The goal is the specification and the standard that the administrative system should strive to reach, and the determination of the goal of the administrative system reform often plays a leading and decisive role in the effect of the reform. It is of great significance to study the goal of administrative system reform. Taking the reform and opening up as the time node, from 1982 the first round of administrative system reform to the 18 Congress of the Party. A total of six large-scale reforms were carried out. In 2013, a new round of reform was launched. In general, the previous reforms have clear objectives, have their own emphases, and have basically achieved the expected results. The goals of previous reforms remain unjustified, such as lack of strategic, systemic, and stability. This article starts with the connotation analysis of the administrative system reform goal, constructs the target analysis frame from three aspects of the administrative system reform goal design, the value orientation and the ecological factor. At the same time, on the basis of discussing the relevant theory of administrative system reform, this paper systematically combs, generalizes, analyzes and evaluates the objectives of previous administrative system reform in China. In order to broaden the research field of vision, this paper briefly introduces and analyzes the target choice of the contemporary western government administrative reform, as well as the reference and inspiration to the goal design of China's administrative system reform. Based on the above analysis, the author puts forward some thoughts on the goal of China's administrative system reform in the new period: it mainly covers the relationship between the overall goal of comprehensively deepening the reform and the goal of China's administrative system reform. In the new period, the principles and standards of administrative system reform goal, the orientation of government role and the guarantee of goal realization are discussed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張康之;論“公共性”及其在公共行政中的實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2005年01期

2 王浦劬;;全面準(zhǔn)確深入把握全面深化改革的總目標(biāo)[J];中國(guó)高校社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年01期

3 林地 ,湯桂元;中國(guó)的改革為什么不能選擇“休克療法”——兼析漸進(jìn)性改革[J];湖北師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年04期

4 艾琳·卡馬克,何增科;全球化和公共行政改革[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2002年03期

5 李文濤,蘇琳;制度創(chuàng)新理論研究述評(píng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2001年11期

6 毛壽龍;中國(guó)政府體制改革的過去與未來[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

7 秦德君;;政治設(shè)計(jì)技術(shù)范疇分析[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

8 楊昕;經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革與行政體制改革的良性互動(dòng)[J];理論探討;2005年03期

9 孫育瑋;“法制”與“法治”概念再分析[J];求是學(xué)刊;1998年04期

10 李明伍;公共性的一般類型及其若干傳統(tǒng)模型[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;1997年04期

本文編號(hào)：1481871