本文關(guān)鍵詞： 知識(shí)分子 公共性 弱化 建構(gòu)　出處：《西安科技大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：從20世紀(jì)80年代的文化熱開始，知識(shí)分子問題就一直是中國學(xué)術(shù)界的熱門話題。到90年代中后期，隨著市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的建立，特別是后現(xiàn)代思潮從西方的傳入，我國進(jìn)入了一個(gè)急劇變化的社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期。隨著知識(shí)體制和教育體制日益完善，世俗社會(huì)的功利主義、工具理性大規(guī)模侵入學(xué)界，強(qiáng)有力地誘導(dǎo)著大批學(xué)者放棄公共關(guān)懷，在體制內(nèi)部尋求個(gè)人發(fā)展。筆者認(rèn)為，真正的知識(shí)分子除了要具備一定的專業(yè)知識(shí)外，還要深切關(guān)心政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、生態(tài)等社會(huì)生活方面的問題，他們應(yīng)當(dāng)擁有強(qiáng)烈的批判精神，并承擔(dān)起超越自身專業(yè)的普遍的社會(huì)責(zé)任。然而現(xiàn)實(shí)并非如此，知識(shí)分子的聲音在后現(xiàn)代思潮的影響下逐漸消失，如何改變當(dāng)代中國“知識(shí)分子的公共性”弱化境況并建構(gòu)其公共性，使他們?yōu)橹袊娼ǔ尚】瞪鐣?huì)貢獻(xiàn)力量，這是本文問題的由來。 本文第一部分為緒論，對(duì)本文的研究背景和意義、研究方法和內(nèi)容、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了闡述。第二部分為“知識(shí)分子”探究，在該部分，首先從詞源學(xué)角度分析了知識(shí)分子的起源，接著通過對(duì)知識(shí)分子概念的辨析，對(duì)何為“知識(shí)分子”有一個(gè)清楚的認(rèn)識(shí)，然后通過分析中國“知識(shí)分子”的歷史演變，明確知識(shí)分子在社會(huì)中承擔(dān)的重任，最后分析了知識(shí)分子的公共性屬性。第三部分是對(duì)馬克思主義知識(shí)分子理論和西方馬克思主義知識(shí)分子理論的概述。第四部分首先概括了當(dāng)代中國知識(shí)分子公共性弱化的表現(xiàn)，其次從經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)、自身三方面探究了當(dāng)代中國知識(shí)分子公共性弱化的原因，為第四部分公共性建構(gòu)的路徑提供支持。第五部分是本文的重點(diǎn)。分析了當(dāng)代中國知識(shí)分子公共性建構(gòu)的必要性，在此基礎(chǔ)上從經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)、自身三方面詳細(xì)闡述了如何建構(gòu)當(dāng)代中國知識(shí)分子的公共性。第六部分是結(jié)語，知識(shí)分子要想發(fā)揮其公共性并促進(jìn)社會(huì)的發(fā)展和進(jìn)步，仍是一個(gè)不斷進(jìn)行自我剖析、自我改造的過程。
[Abstract]:Since 1980s, the intellectual issue has been a hot topic in Chinese academic circles. In 90s, with the establishment of the market economy. Especially the introduction of postmodernism from the West, China has entered a rapidly changing social transformation period. With the increasingly perfect knowledge system and education system, secular society utilitarianism. The massive invasion of instrumental rationality strongly induces a large number of scholars to give up public concern and seek personal development within the system. They should also be deeply concerned about the social life problems such as politics, economy, culture, ecology and so on. They should have a strong spirit of criticism and assume the universal social responsibility beyond their own specialties. However, this is not the case in reality. The voice of intellectuals gradually disappeared under the influence of postmodern trend of thought. How to change the weakening situation of "intellectual publicity" and construct its publicity in contemporary China. It is the origin of this paper to make them contribute to the building of a well-off society in an all-round way in China. The first part of this paper is the introduction, the research background and significance, research methods and content, domestic and foreign research status. The second part is "intellectuals" research, in this part. First of all, it analyzes the origin of intellectuals from the perspective of etymology, and then through the analysis of the concept of intellectuals, there is a clear understanding of what is "intellectuals". Then through the analysis of the historical evolution of Chinese "intellectuals", it is clear that intellectuals bear the heavy responsibility in the society. The third part is an overview of Marxist intellectual theory and Western Marxist intellectual theory. Part 4th summarizes the public nature of contemporary Chinese intellectuals. The expression of sexual weakening. Secondly, it explores the reasons for the weakening of the publicity of contemporary Chinese intellectuals from three aspects of economy, society and itself. Part 5th is the focus of this paper. This paper analyzes the necessity of the construction of the publicity of contemporary Chinese intellectuals, and on this basis from the economic, social. This paper expounds in detail how to construct the publicity of contemporary Chinese intellectuals in three aspects. Part 6th is the conclusion. Intellectuals want to give play to its publicity and promote the development and progress of society. Is still a continuous self-analysis, self-transformation process.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D663.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李莊;當(dāng)代知識(shí)分子的邊緣化和公共性的喪失[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

2 梅榮政,周志平;“公共知識(shí)分子”論是怎樣一種思潮?[J];高校理論戰(zhàn)線;2005年02期

3 徐艷;;重建當(dāng)代知識(shí)分子的公共性[J];廣西民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年S2期

4 杜維明;“公共知識(shí)分子”與儒學(xué)的現(xiàn)代性發(fā)展[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

5 王增進(jìn);關(guān)于“知識(shí)分子”詞源的若干問題[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2003年01期

6 陳聆希;;責(zé)任:受眾的一個(gè)心理特征——兼談公共知識(shí)分子的產(chǎn)生原因[J];科教文匯(上旬刊);2010年01期

7 汝緒華;;論公共知識(shí)分子精神與均衡階層話語權(quán)[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2010年07期

8 鄧雪琳;;“公共知識(shí)分子”思潮簡論[J];理論觀察;2009年02期

9 李春敏;;當(dāng)代中國人文知識(shí)分子的社會(huì)角色與作用[J];理論視野;2008年12期

10 孟軻;;馬克思主義知識(shí)分子理論中國化之回顧與反思[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1460683