發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-10 16:39

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：中小學(xué)教育亂象治理中的公眾參與研究　出處：《浙江師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 中小學(xué) 教育亂象治理 公眾參與

【摘要】：2014開年之初,習(xí)近平就在中紀(jì)委三次全會(huì)上以“零容忍”的態(tài)度為持續(xù)一年多的反腐敗戰(zhàn)役吹響了沖鋒號(hào)。長期以來政府和公眾的注意力更多聚焦于政治經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域的腐敗問題,而教育部門腐敗的隱身性、復(fù)雜性使其以水滴石穿的侵蝕力在動(dòng)搖著我們民族的根基。貪污受賄、違規(guī)收費(fèi)、權(quán)學(xué)(錢學(xué)、色學(xué))交易、招生考試舞弊、科研造假與經(jīng)費(fèi)流失、有償家教和師德缺失等使教育這一凈土已成腐敗的高發(fā)區(qū)。特別是事關(guān)國運(yùn)與民生的基礎(chǔ)教育,更是引起了公眾的極大不滿。本文通過對(duì)教育亂象以及公眾參與的相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行文獻(xiàn)梳理,對(duì)基礎(chǔ)教育亂象治理中公眾參與的主體、參與的內(nèi)容及參與的途徑進(jìn)行重點(diǎn)研究,同時(shí)采用問卷調(diào)查法和案例分析法對(duì)公眾參與教育亂象治理的表現(xiàn)形式、參與意愿、參與現(xiàn)狀及影響因素進(jìn)行調(diào)查,以了解公眾參與教育亂象治理的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況,并進(jìn)行歸因分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建中小學(xué)教育教育亂象治理中的公眾參與機(jī)制。通過調(diào)查研究可以得知,公眾參與教育反腐的表現(xiàn)形式發(fā)生了一定的變化,媒體和網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)越來越受到公眾的親睞。公眾參與教育亂象治理的意識(shí)有所增強(qiáng),但參與意識(shí)還不夠強(qiáng)烈,容易受到內(nèi)外部各種因素的影響,公眾參與意識(shí)還有待提升。同時(shí)公眾對(duì)于教育治理責(zé)任的認(rèn)知度還不高,相當(dāng)大一部分公眾還沒有認(rèn)識(shí)到自身的主體作用。通過對(duì)現(xiàn)狀的調(diào)查研究發(fā)現(xiàn),公眾在教育亂象治理中的實(shí)際參與度比較低,很多公眾對(duì)于實(shí)際參與教育治理表現(xiàn)出顧慮和擔(dān)憂。究其原因,主要受到自身因素、社會(huì)因素和制度因素的影響,因此本文從主要從三個(gè)方面來構(gòu)建中小學(xué)教育亂象治理中的公眾參與機(jī)制,分別是政策保障機(jī)制、宣傳教育機(jī)制和公眾參與機(jī)制,以期通過這些有效的公眾參與機(jī)制構(gòu)建,為相關(guān)政策的出臺(tái)和完善提供意見和建議。
[Abstract]:The beginning of 2014. Xi Jinping's "Zero tolerance" at the third Plenary session of the Central Commission for discipline Inspection. The government and the public have long focused more on corruption in the political economy. The invisibility and complexity of corruption in the education sector make it shake the foundation of our nation with the erosion of water drops and stones. Corruption and bribery, illegal fees, rights (money, color) transactions, enrollment examination fraud. Fake scientific research and loss of funds, paid family education and lack of teachers' ethics have made the pure land of education a high incidence of corruption, especially the basic education which is related to the national luck and people's livelihood. This article through the educational chaos and the public participation related research literature combing, to the basic education chaos governance public participation of the main body. At the same time, the method of questionnaire and case analysis is used to investigate the forms, willingness, status quo and influencing factors of public participation in educational disorder governance. In order to understand the reality of public participation in the governance of educational chaos, and the attribution analysis, on this basis, the construction of primary and secondary education in the governance of public participation mechanism of public participation. Through investigation and research can be known. The form of public participation in education anti-corruption has changed, the media and network platform are increasingly popular with the public. The awareness of public participation in educational chaos governance has been enhanced, but the awareness of participation is not strong enough. Easy to be affected by various internal and external factors, the awareness of public participation needs to be improved. At the same time, the public awareness of the responsibility of educational governance is not high. A large part of the public has not yet recognized their main role. Through the investigation of the current situation, it is found that the actual participation of the public in the governance of educational chaos is relatively low. Many members of the public are concerned about the actual participation in educational governance. The reasons are mainly affected by their own factors, social factors and institutional factors. Therefore, this paper mainly from three aspects to construct the mechanism of public participation in the governance of educational chaos in primary and secondary schools, namely, the mechanism of policy guarantee, the mechanism of publicity and education and the mechanism of public participation. The purpose of this paper is to provide advice and suggestions for the promulgation and improvement of relevant policies through the construction of these effective public participation mechanisms.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G639.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 宋林霖;徐妍;;論教育腐敗的制度規(guī)治[J];山西大同大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

2 曾智昌;;論教育腐敗對(duì)學(xué)校決策的影響[J];教學(xué)與管理;2009年04期

3 徐建平,徐志勇,黃立志;關(guān)于亂收費(fèi)問題校長調(diào)查問卷的分析[J];教育理論與實(shí)踐;2005年13期

4 趙剛印;;公眾參與的應(yīng)然與實(shí)然——增強(qiáng)公眾參與社會(huì)治理有效性的路徑選擇[J];理論探討;2006年03期

5 褚松燕;;我國公民參與的制度環(huán)境分析[J];上海行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

6 黃國石;尋租、腐敗及其防治對(duì)策[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年03期

7 胡艷;歷史的沉重:科舉考試的腐敗與懲治[J];中國教師;2003年01期

8 劉明;論科學(xué)精神和科學(xué)精神的缺失[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年05期

9 吳宏超;;論教育腐敗的成因與治理[J];華中師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 潘軍海;新時(shí)期公眾參與反腐敗之研究[D];河海大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1405995