本文選題：農(nóng)村土地信托 + 承包經(jīng)營權(quán)　； 參考：《西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題是我國的核心問題,該問題關(guān)系到農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展質(zhì)量與糧食安全。近年來,我國城鎮(zhèn)化程度迅速提高的背景下,大批農(nóng)民進(jìn)城務(wù)工,出現(xiàn)了城鄉(xiāng)差距日益擴大、農(nóng)村土地經(jīng)營效率低下、大量拋荒的現(xiàn)象,在深層次上反映出傳統(tǒng)的土地流轉(zhuǎn)方式已經(jīng)難以適應(yīng)規(guī)模化、集約化的農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)要求。于是,土地流轉(zhuǎn)方式的創(chuàng)新成為必然選擇。 我國許多地方自發(fā)開展了農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的信托化探索,信托制度的財產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移功能、財產(chǎn)獨立性、信托的長期性和穩(wěn)定性等特征能否有效地促進(jìn)我國土地的集約化和規(guī)模化利用值得進(jìn)一步的探討和研究。 本文主要從農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的改進(jìn)目標(biāo)、農(nóng)村土地信托的法律要素的構(gòu)成、我國開展的相關(guān)實踐以及有待改進(jìn)等方面進(jìn)行分析,并給出筆者自己的合理化建議。具體可以分為以下幾個部分： 第一章介紹了將信托引入農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的大背景、國內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn)綜述、研究思路和方法、研究的內(nèi)容、創(chuàng)新與不足這四個方面進(jìn)行了簡要闡述： 第二章對傳統(tǒng)的土地流轉(zhuǎn)方式各自的優(yōu)勢和缺陷進(jìn)行了分析,并提出土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的流轉(zhuǎn)目標(biāo),進(jìn)而引出土地流轉(zhuǎn)方式的信托化；第三章從信托制度的起源、農(nóng)村土地信托的內(nèi)涵和農(nóng)村土地信托的獨特法律特征、委托人、受托人、受益人的權(quán)利義務(wù)以及農(nóng)村土地信托的財產(chǎn)獨立性等方面入手、論證將信托制度與農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)相結(jié)合的可行性。 第四章采用橫向比較的研究方法、以農(nóng)村土地信托在美國和日本的發(fā)展情況為研究對象,總結(jié)以美國、日本兩種代表性強的模式各自的獨特優(yōu)勢。從中探索對我國的相應(yīng)領(lǐng)域的借鑒價值。 第五章對我國農(nóng)村土地信托的現(xiàn)狀作了基本描述,對目前以信托方式開展農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的不同的基本運行原理進(jìn)行比較,對各自的優(yōu)缺點進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié)。 第六章指出我國處于萌芽階段的農(nóng)村土地信托實踐中出現(xiàn)的問題和不足之處,對這些問題的形成原因和負(fù)面影響進(jìn)行了分析。 第七章著呢對前述問題從立法完善、交易機制構(gòu)建、監(jiān)管等幾個方面提出筆者的合理化建議。 結(jié)論部分對全文進(jìn)行了簡單的回顧和總結(jié),并對本文未作論述或者論述不夠的地方作了簡單的說明。
[Abstract]:The issue of rural land circulation is the core problem in China, which is related to the quality of agricultural development and food security. In recent years, with the rapid development of urbanization in our country, a large number of peasants have entered the city to work, and the gap between urban and rural areas has been widening day by day, the efficiency of rural land management has been low, and a large number of abandoned. The deep level reflects the traditional land circulation way has already been difficult to adapt to the scale, the intensive agricultural production request. As a result, the innovation of land circulation has become an inevitable choice. Many places in our country have spontaneously carried out the trust exploration of rural land circulation, the property transfer function of trust system and the property independence. Whether the long-term and stability of trust can effectively promote the intensive and large-scale utilization of land in China is worthy of further discussion and study. The composition of the legal elements of the rural land trust, the relevant practice in China and the need for improvement are analyzed, and the author's own rationalization suggestions are given. Specific can be divided into the following parts: the first chapter introduces the trust into the rural land circulation background, domestic and foreign literature review, research ideas and methods, research content, Four aspects of innovation and deficiency are briefly expounded: chapter two analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the traditional land transfer mode, and puts forward the transfer goal of the land contract management right, which leads to the trust of the land transfer mode; The third chapter starts with the origin of the trust system, the connotation of the rural land trust, the unique legal characteristics of the rural land trust, the rights and obligations of the trustor, the beneficiary and the property independence of the rural land trust. The fourth chapter uses the horizontal comparative research method, taking the development of rural land trust in the United States and Japan as the research object, summarizes the United States, The unique advantages of Japan's two representative models. The fifth chapter describes the current situation of rural land trust in China, and compares the different basic operating principles of rural land transfer in the form of trust. The sixth chapter points out the problems and deficiencies in the practice of rural land trust in the embryonic stage of our country. The reasons for the formation of these problems and their negative effects are analyzed. In the seventh chapter, uh, from the perspective of the legislative perfection and the construction of the transaction mechanism, In conclusion, the author makes a brief review and summary of the full text, and gives a brief explanation of the place that this paper has not discussed or discussed not enough.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.2;D922.282

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 閆軍印;;國有獨資公司的法律屬性及其治理的制度重構(gòu)[J];長江論壇;2007年02期

2 岳意定;劉志仁;張璇;;國外農(nóng)村土地信托:研究現(xiàn)狀及借鑒[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2007年02期

3 王曉利;馬曉麗;吉偉卓;;關(guān)于實行農(nóng)地信托促進(jìn)農(nóng)地健康流轉(zhuǎn)的思考[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2012年03期

4 張麗華,趙志毅;農(nóng)村土地信托制度初探[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王忠林;我國農(nóng)村集體土地流轉(zhuǎn)制度研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2001642