本文選題：票據(jù) + 相對無因性　； 參考：《蘭州大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：票據(jù)是最早產(chǎn)生、最典型的有價證券,它在加快商品交換速度、加強商業(yè)信用、加速資金周轉方面發(fā)揮著重要作用。隨著世界各國市場經(jīng)濟的不斷向前發(fā)展,人們對各種交易的便捷性和安全性提出了更高的要求,而票據(jù)通過票據(jù)無因性賦予的超強流通性滿足了人們的這一迫切需求,極大地促進了社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展�？梢�,票據(jù)無因性對票據(jù)的自由流通起著至關重要的作用�；诖�,世界各國都相繼承認票據(jù)的無因性,將其作為票據(jù)法的一項根本原則貫徹到自己的票據(jù)制度中,并在實施后取得了很好的效果,有力地推動了本國經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。票據(jù)無因性已成為現(xiàn)代票據(jù)制度的基礎。 然而在我國,不僅在票據(jù)無因性的理論研究方面還存有爭議,而且在票據(jù)無因性制度規(guī)范方面也不甚明晰。造成這一現(xiàn)象的主要原因：一是對票據(jù)無因性的理論研究不夠,導致認識存有差異,而這種認識的差異使我國票據(jù)無因性制度的建構缺乏扎實的理論基礎；二是我國尚處于經(jīng)濟轉型期,很多制度層面的改革還不夠徹底,仍趨于保守,造成了我國票據(jù)法對票據(jù)無因性的規(guī)定模棱兩可、自相矛盾。票據(jù)無因性制度的不完善給票據(jù)的自由流通帶來極大障礙,限制了票據(jù)充分發(fā)揮其各項功能,從一定程度上阻礙了我國經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。 正是在我國目前這種情況下,對于票據(jù)無因性制度的研究就顯得尤為必要。本文通過對票據(jù)無因性概念的重新闡釋、對票據(jù)無因性制度的基礎和制度基本內(nèi)容的分析,在理論上進一步深化了對票據(jù)無因性的認識,重構了票據(jù)無因性理論的主要內(nèi)容,為票據(jù)無因性制度的研究夯實了基礎。通過考察國外票據(jù)無因性的立法,進行制度比較分析,使視野更加開闊,為我國票據(jù)無因性制度的完善提供了有益的參考。在重構票據(jù)無因性理論、考察國外票據(jù)無因性立法、分析我國票據(jù)無因性制度主要問題的基礎上,提出完善我國票據(jù)無因性制度的個人建議。
[Abstract]:Bill is the earliest and most typical securities, which plays an important role in accelerating the speed of commodity exchange, strengthening commercial credit and speeding up the turnover of funds. With the continuous development of the market economy in the world, people put forward higher requirements for the convenience and security of all kinds of transactions. It has greatly promoted the development of social economy. It can be seen that the non-causality of bills plays a vital role in the free circulation of bills. Based on this, every country in the world has recognized the non-causality of the bill one after another, implemented it as a fundamental principle of the instrument law into its own bill system, and has achieved good results after its implementation, which has promoted the development of its own economy. The non-causality of bills has become the basis of the modern bill system, but in our country, there are not only disputes in the theoretical research of the non-causality of the bill, but also lack of clarity in the regulation of the system of the non-causality of the bill. The main reasons for this phenomenon are as follows: first, the theoretical research on the uncausality of bills is not enough, which leads to the difference of cognition, which makes the construction of the system of the non-causality of bills in our country lack a solid theoretical foundation; Second, our country is still in the economic transition period, many system level reform is not enough thorough, still tends to be conservative, has caused our country negotiable instrument law to the bill without cause the stipulation is ambiguous, contradictory. The imperfection of the system of non-causality of bill brings great obstacle to the free circulation of bill, limits the bill to give full play to its various functions, and to a certain extent hinders the development of our country's economy. It is particularly necessary to study the system of bills without cause. Through the reinterpretation of the concept of the non-causality of the bill, the analysis of the foundation and the basic contents of the system, the paper further deepens the understanding of the non-causality of the bill in theory, and reconstructs the main content of the theory of the non-causality of the bill. It lays a solid foundation for the research of the system of bill uncausality. By investigating the legislation of the non-causality of foreign bills and making a comparative analysis of the system, the author makes a wider view and provides a useful reference for the perfection of the system of the non-causality of bills in our country. On the basis of reconstructing the theory of non-causality of bills, investigating the legislation of non-causality in foreign countries, and analyzing the main problems of the system of non-causality of bills in China, the author puts forward some personal suggestions on how to perfect the system of non-causality of bills in China.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.287

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 董惠江;關于票據(jù)抗辯限制的新思考[J];比較法研究;2003年06期

2 郭敏;;票據(jù)的無因性[J];福建法學;1999年02期

3 夏林林;對票據(jù)無因性原則法律適用的思考[J];法律適用;2004年01期

4 郭澤華;應堅持票據(jù)行為的無因性──兼評我國票據(jù)法[J];法學雜志;1997年01期

5 張奇;;從票據(jù)無因性看我國《票據(jù)法》的缺憾[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2008年10期

6 李幼明,宋志國;對我國票據(jù)立法中無因性限制的探討[J];中央政法管理干部學院學報;2000年01期

7 蔣大興;《票據(jù)法》的立法缺陷及其完善[J];河北法學;1996年04期

8 段衛(wèi)華,胡海濤;票據(jù)無因性原則之理論探討及其立法完善[J];河北法學;2005年09期

9 汪世虎;論票據(jù)行為的無因性[J];海南大學學報(人文社會科學版);2003年03期

10 汪丁丁;回顧“金融革命”[J];經(jīng)濟研究;1997年12期

，

本文編號：2001583