本文選題：碳金融 + 碳金融市場　； 參考：《天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：霧霾、PM2.5(細(xì)顆粒物)、空氣質(zhì)量指數(shù)(AQI),這些曾經(jīng)陌生的詞語逐漸走入公眾的視野。今年兩會期間,北京持續(xù)的霧霾天再次引發(fā)代表們對生態(tài)和環(huán)境問題的熱議,這也是中國粗放式經(jīng)濟發(fā)展模式所付出的代價。發(fā)展低碳經(jīng)濟、減少二氧化碳排放已然成為世界性共識。國際性金融機構(gòu)、對沖基金、私募基金等紛紛涉足低碳經(jīng)濟領(lǐng)域,使得與低碳經(jīng)濟發(fā)展最為緊密的碳金融市場紛紛興起。隨著2012年《京都協(xié)議書》第一承諾期的結(jié)束和2013年第二承諾期的到來,以及加拿大、新西蘭等傘形集團國家宣布退出《京都協(xié)議書》的第二承諾期,使得全球碳金融市場的發(fā)展面臨著更大的不確定性。作為《京都協(xié)議書》第二承諾期的締約方、全球最大的碳減排資源供應(yīng)國之一的中國如何實現(xiàn)2020年單位國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值的二氧化碳排放要比2005年下降40%-45%的承諾目標(biāo)、如何在國際碳金融市場上獲得更多的話語權(quán)和定價權(quán),是我們亟待解決和思考的問題。 我國碳金融市場基礎(chǔ)薄弱,碳交易體系、政策法規(guī)體系以及監(jiān)管體系等方面尚不完善,這將造成國內(nèi)碳交易市場的滯后,阻礙市場機制促進節(jié)能減排作用的發(fā)揮。鑒于此,本文采用對比分析法、定性與定量分析相結(jié)合的方法,在分析比較國內(nèi)外碳金融市場發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,探討了我國碳金融市場發(fā)展面臨的困境與不足之處,并從總量控制和配額分配制度、MRV制度、交易機制、靈活履約機制以及定價機制等方面嘗試性地提出構(gòu)建我國碳金融市場交易體系的總體框架,并在第6章結(jié)合我國的具體國情提出了進一步完善我國碳金融市場的對策建議。在第5章核心部分,在借鑒歐盟、美國、澳大利亞以及日本的碳交易體系的基礎(chǔ)上,提出構(gòu)建并完善我國碳金融市場交易體系的設(shè)想和總體框架,并運用實證分析法研究了我國碳金融市場的定價機制,為我國爭奪在國際碳市場上的話語權(quán)和定價權(quán)奠定基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Haze PM2.5 (fine particulate matter, Air quality Index (AQI)), once unfamiliar words are gradually coming into the public eye. During this year's two sessions, Beijing's persistent haze days have once again sparked a heated debate among delegates on ecological and environmental issues, which are the price of China's extensive economic development model. Developing low-carbon economy and reducing carbon dioxide emissions have become a worldwide consensus. International financial institutions, hedge funds and private equity funds have been involved in the low-carbon economy, leading to the rise of the carbon finance market, which is most closely related to the low-carbon economy. With the end of the first commitment period of the Kyoto Agreement in 2012 and the arrival of the second commitment period in 2013, as well as the announcement of withdrawal from the second commitment period of the Kyoto Agreement by umbrella group countries such as Canada and New Zealand, The development of the global carbon financial market is facing greater uncertainty. How China, as a Party to the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, one of the world's largest suppliers of carbon abatement resources, can meet its commitment target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions per unit of gross domestic product by 40 to 45 per cent by 2020 compared with 2005, How to obtain more right of speech and pricing in the international carbon finance market is an urgent problem to be solved. China's carbon financial market is weak, carbon trading system, policies and regulations system and regulatory system are not perfect, which will cause the domestic carbon trading market lag, hinder the market mechanism to promote the role of energy conservation and emission reduction. In view of this, this paper adopts the method of comparative analysis, qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis, on the basis of analyzing and comparing the current development situation of carbon financial market at home and abroad, discusses the difficulties and shortcomings of the development of carbon finance market in China. And from the aspects of total quantity control and quota distribution system, such as MRV system, transaction mechanism, flexible performance mechanism and pricing mechanism, this paper tries to put forward the overall framework of constructing the trading system of carbon finance market in China. In chapter 6, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect China's carbon finance market. In the core part of Chapter 5, based on the carbon trading system of EU, USA, Australia and Japan, the paper puts forward the idea and overall framework of constructing and perfecting the trading system of China's carbon financial market. The pricing mechanism of China's carbon financial market is studied by using the empirical analysis method, which lays the foundation for our country to compete for the right of speech and pricing in the international carbon market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周健;;我國低碳經(jīng)濟與碳金融研究綜述[J];財經(jīng)科學(xué);2010年05期

2 陳游;;碳金融與我國商業(yè)銀行的業(yè)務(wù)創(chuàng)新[J];金融論壇;2009年10期

3 喬海曙;譚燁;劉小麗;;中國碳金融理論研究的最新進展[J];金融論壇;2011年02期

4 林立;;低碳經(jīng)濟背景下國際碳金融市場發(fā)展及風(fēng)險研究[J];當(dāng)代財經(jīng);2012年02期

5 曾剛;萬志宏;;國際碳金融市場:現(xiàn)狀、問題與前景[J];國際金融研究;2009年10期

6 陸靜;;后京都時代碳金融發(fā)展的法律路徑[J];國際金融研究;2010年08期

7 王雪磊;;后危機時代碳金融市場發(fā)展困境與中國策略[J];國際金融研究;2012年02期

8 郭福春;潘錫泉;;碳市場:價格波動及風(fēng)險測度——基于EUETS期貨合約價格的實證分析[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2011年07期

9 袁定喜;;我國碳貿(mào)易定價權(quán)缺失的原因與對策研究[J];價格理論與實踐;2010年08期

10 羅曉娜;林震;;低碳經(jīng)濟下的金融發(fā)展與金融創(chuàng)新[J];經(jīng)濟與管理;2010年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉婧;基于強度減排的我國碳交易市場機制研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1867823